Guiding Seminar 2 (2020) Flashcards
Hedge Funds: Past, Present, and Future. Stulz, R.M. (2007).
What is a closed-end fund?
A closed-end fund is created when an investment company raises money through an IPO and then trades its shares on the public market like a stock. Closed-end funds limit the amount of shares issued.
Hedge Funds: Past, Present, and Future. Stulz, R.M. (2007).
What is an open-end fund?
Open-end fund does not limit the amount of shares a company issues, but rather issues as many as investors want.
(unlimited amount of shares issued, option to buy back shares). Valued at NAV (net asset value= (total asset value - liabilities)/total shares outstanding)).
Hedge Funds: Past, Present, and Future. Stulz, R.M. (2007).
What is an ETF?
Exchange traded fund - A collection of securities(e.g. stocks) that tracks an underlying index, although they can invest in any number of industry sectors or use various strategies. (e.g. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY), which tracks the S&P 500 Index)
Hedge Funds: Past, Present, and Future. Stulz, R.M. (2007).
What is a hedge fund?
A private investment fund that markets itself almost exclusively to wealthy investors. Actively managed (complex strategies), specific requirements for potential investors. Small in size, but require BIG initial INVESTMENT.
Hedge Funds: Past, Present, and Future. Stulz, R.M. (2007).
What is a mutual fund?
A type of financial vehicle made up of a pool of money collected from many investors to invest in securities. Mutual funds are operated by professional money managers. Almost anyone can invest in mutual funds. BIG in size, but small initial investment required. NO leverage/short-selling.
Hedge Funds: Past, Present, and Future. Stulz, R.M. (2007).
Describe regulation and disclosure policies of hedge funds vs. mutual funds
Hedge funds- unregulated leading to aggressive and risky strategies. No disclosure needed (meaning their wishy washy strategies are protected but risk evaluation is impossible). Sometimes they disclose voluntarily to attract funds.
Mutual funds - heavily regulated (risk level, manager’s compensation, governance). Disclosure, reporting and auditing required.
Hedge Funds: Past, Present, and Future. Stulz, R.M. (2007).
Describe funds withdrawal of hedge funds vs. mutual funds
Hedge funds: Lock - up (window of time when investors are not allowed to buy or sell shares of a particular investment) period is set by hedge fund (month - years) Notice about withdrawal should be given month in advance.
Mutual funds: very LIQUID, shares can be bought and sold daily.
Hedge Funds: Past, Present, and Future. Stulz, R.M. (2007).
Describe managers compensation of hedge funds vs. mutual funds
Hedge funds: 1 -2% of assets under management. 15-25% above the hurdle rate (the minimum rate of return on a project or investment required by a manager or investor). Managers get compensated only when loss is recovered.
Mutual funds: depends on assets under management.
Hedge Funds: Past, Present, and Future. Stulz, R.M. (2007).
What do hedge funds do?
Attempt to find trades that are almost arbitrage opportunities. They use derivatives and short-selling, which allows them to make use of arbitrage opportunities better that mutual funds.
Some have been accused of making money in wishy-washy ways: insider trading, late trading.
Hedge Funds: Past, Present, and Future. Stulz, R.M. (2007).
Will hedge funds be affected by the changes in the market?
Not really - if the stock market drops, the mutual fund would lose but a hedge fund no. They become market-neutral over time. Hedge funds are expected to have average performance (while equity markets have good or bad performance).
Hedge Funds: Past, Present, and Future. Stulz, R.M. (2007).
Describe hedge fund strategies (4).
- A long-short equity. Takes both - long and short positions in stocks. E.g., they identify undervalued stocks, then take long positions, and hedge with short options and futures.
- Event-driven. Takes advantage of opportunities created by significant events (spin-offs, mergers and acquisitions, bankruptcies). They try to predict the outcome.
- Macro hedge fund. Identify mispriced valuations in stock markets, interest rates, foreign exchange rates, create leveraged betas in these markets.
- Fixed income arbitrage. Find arbitrage opportunities in fixed-income markets. (e.g. where government and corporate bonds are traded)
Hedge Funds: Past, Present, and Future. Stulz, R.M. (2007).
How have hedge funds been performing vs. the mutual funds?
Hedge funds perform slightly better with less risk.
Returns: 10.8% (hedge); 10.3% (mutual)
Risk: 7.8% (hedge); 14.5% (mutual)
Alphas: positive (hedge); negative/0 (mutual)
Hedge Funds: Past, Present, and Future. Stulz, R.M. (2007).
Why is it difficult to assess individual hedge fund performance? (4)
- Biased Sample: only hedge funds who voluntarily send their returns can be observed (because they are not regulated).
- Need to adjust for market exposure: complex strategies with complex derivatives make it hard to measure risk-adjusted returns. (it is hard to measure what big brain do)
- Past performance of hedge fund gives selective view of risk: hedge funds may have similar payoffs to those of earthquake insurance companies (most of the time earthquakes don’t happen and a company gets profit, but when it does, they have to pay out a lot)
- Problems of valuation: OTC traded securities.
Hedge Funds: Past, Present, and Future. Stulz, R.M. (2007).
What are the risks of hedge funds to the economy? (4)
- Investor protection: 10% of hedge funds stop working every year because of poor performance
- Risks to financial institutions: Create credit exposures (they borrow, transact, use derivatives). They are very levered, and a collapse of large hedge fund may create problems in the economy.
- Liquidity risks: hedge funds rely on the ability to get out of trades when things are going wrong, but if they do this when things are going wrong, it can make matters worse.
- Excess to volatility risks: hedge funds can lead prices to overreact by making trades that push prices away from fundamental values (NOT enough EVIDENCE for this)
Hedge Funds: Past, Present, and Future. Stulz, R.M. (2007).
What is the future of hedge funds? (3)
As the hedge fund industry grows, concerns about their regulation also (žuļiki jāreguleito).
- this would make them similar to mutual funds
- discretion will have to decline when they get more institutional investors
- growing industry will result in everyone running after same price discrepancies (profits), which makes everyone get less.
Hedge Funds: Past, Present, and Future. Stulz, R.M. (2007).
What is LTCM and what happened to it?
Hedge fund with extreme exposure and leverage, huge initial investment required to join, amazing performance in first years (40%).
They held assets worth 125B$, where only 4B$ were their own (the rest borrowed). Derivatives in the amount of 1 Trillion.
When Russia defaulted on its debt in 1998, there was a worldwide flight to safety by investors.
Prone to Fail: The Pre-Crisis Financial System
Duffie, D. (2019)
What were the largest 5 investment banks in the US in the time of crisis?
Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley
Prone to Fail: The Pre-Crisis Financial System
Duffie, D. (2019)
In broad terms, how was the government regulation of finance firms before the crisis?
A well-supervised financial system could have been more resilient to such event, but the impact on real economy was much larger than necessary.
The largest firms were permitted to have insufficient capital and liquidity relative to the risks they took.
Oversight of the capital adequacy of the largest investment banks by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) was particularly lax. AIG was not effectively supervised as well.
Prone to Fail: The Pre-Crisis Financial System
Duffie, D. (2019)
Who are market makers?
A dealer in securities or other assets who undertakes to buy or sell at specified prices at all times.
E.g. sometimes if you want to sell a security, no one is willing to buy it from you (sad), thus, a market maker will buy it, and sell it sometime later, so everyone’s happy. He gets bid-ask rate as profit.
Prone to Fail: The Pre-Crisis Financial System
Duffie, D. (2019)
What are repos?
Short-term borrowing for dealers in government securities. One sells government securities to someone else, usually on an overnight basis, and buys them back the following day at a slightly higher price.
Prone to Fail: The Pre-Crisis Financial System
Duffie, D. (2019)
What are tri-party repos?
Banks deal with repos, so that two parties do not have to deal with it themselves. Cash investors held their collateral securities (overnight) at tri-party banks.
Prone to Fail: The Pre-Crisis Financial System
Duffie, D. (2019)
What is a credit crunch?
Decrease in lending by financial institutions. Usually an outcome of flight to safety, when the banks cannot pay back the money or issue new loans.
Prone to Fail: The Pre-Crisis Financial System
Duffie, D. (2019)
2 things that triggered the financial crisis.
Over-leveraged homeowners, severe downturn in US housing markets.
Prone to Fail: The Pre-Crisis Financial System
Duffie, D. (2019)
What are the key sources of why crisis happened? (4)(fragility)
- Weakly supervised balance sheets of largest banks
- The run-prone designs
- Weak regulation of the markets for securities and OTC derivatives.
- Reliance of regulators on the market discipline.
Prone to Fail: The Pre-Crisis Financial System
Duffie, D. (2019)
Why was supervision of the banks so bad? (5)
- SEC put it as their mission to protect customers of financial firms rather than financial stability, they devoted very few resources for supervising (only 4 staff members for big firms). Investment firms actually knew this and chose SEC instead of FED.
- High difficulty level of assessing risk, derivatives and flight-proneness (everyone too dumb dumb to understand what the heck was happening)
- Everyone assigned low probabilities to disasters happening
- Reliance on market discipline
- Historical emphasis on decentralized banking system.
Prone to Fail: The Pre-Crisis Financial System
Duffie, D. (2019)
Describe credit provision in the US.
Credit provision in the US is more dependent on capital markets (where savings and investments are moved between suppliers of capital and those who are in need of capital) rather than how it’s usually done.
Prone to Fail: The Pre-Crisis Financial System
Duffie, D. (2019)
Why were repos a problem?
Capital markets in the US rely heavily on largest dealers who used short-term financing A LOT (mainly through repos). Intra-day financing (when investment bank repos expired, they repaid cash, and were in need for financing until new repos, which was provided by tri-party agent banks) created systemic risks. (2.8$ trillion were issued).
When there was a risk of solvency, cash investors could decide to not renew daily financing (not do repos anymore), thus, the other party (the one selling collateral) needs to sell it really quickly - at fire-sale prices. Also, banks would sell the collateral, as the dealer (investment bank) is not paying back cash, and the cash investors who had bought collateral would sell it too. All this is done at fire -sale (very low) prices.
Prone to Fail: The Pre-Crisis Financial System
Duffie, D. (2019)
What is a SIV?
Special Investment Vehicles. They attempt to profit from the spread between short-term debt and long-term investments by issuing commercial paper of varying maturities.
Particularly prone to runs, could have caused a complete meltdown of securities financing market. It happened in 2008, only FED and US Treasury invoked emergency lending and saved economy from an even worse state.
Prone to Fail: The Pre-Crisis Financial System
Duffie, D. (2019)
What regulations have been implemented since the crisis? (7)
- Elimination of intra-day credit provision by tri-party agent banks.
- Securities inventories are smaller - reduced need for financing
- Declining presumption of “too big to fail” has led dealer financing costs to increase, incentive to hold giant inventories is reduced.
- Tighter regulation of money funds - Reduced dependence of dealers on flight-prone financing from money market mutual funds.
- Bank capital requirements apply to all large dealers
- The two investment banks that survived, took banking charters and are regulated as banks (under FED).
- New bank liquidity coverage regulations introduced.
Prone to Fail: The Pre-Crisis Financial System
Duffie, D. (2019)
Why were OTC derivatives dangerous?
No regulations, very complex trading, no observable risk exposures. When derivatives runs happened, they drain liquidity and eliminate hedges needed by the dealer, increase in concern about creditworthiness of investment banks.
AIG had sudden heavy margin calls on credit-default-swap protection that it had provided to major dealers.
The dependence of these dealers on AIG’s performance on these credit default swaps was an important factor in the decision by the Fed and then the Treasury to rescue AIG.
Prone to Fail: The Pre-Crisis Financial System
Duffie, D. (2019)
What is a margin call?
Margin call occurs when the value of an investor’s margin account (that is, one that contains securities bought with borrowed money) falls below the broker’s required amount. A margin call is the broker’s demand that an investor deposit additional money or securities so that the account is brought up to the minimum value, known as the maintenance margin.
A margin call is usually an indicator that one or more of the securities held in the margin account has decreased in value. When a margin call occurs, the investor must choose to either deposit more money in the account or sell some of the assets held in their account.
Prone to Fail: The Pre-Crisis Financial System
Duffie, D. (2019)
What regulations have been set for OTC derivatives since the crisis?
- Increased use of CENTRAL CLEARING (clearinghouses enter a derivatives trade as the buyer to the original seller, and as the seller to the original buyer).
- -> original counterparties become insulated from each other’s default risk
- -> improves the transparency of derivatives positions
- -> enforces uniform collateral practices that are more easily supervised by regulators, all swap transactions must be reported publicly - New REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS (amount of capital a bank or other financial institution has to have as required by its financial regulator)
- COMPRESSION TRADING —> fintech approach that helps to eliminate redundant sequences of derivative positions (way to reduce the number of outstanding contracts but keep the same economic exposure)
Prone to Fail: The Pre-Crisis Financial System
Duffie, D. (2019)
Why is “too big to fail” bad?
People assumed that:
1. Banks can be relied upon to provide rigorous risk control.
In reality, banks risk management were topped by going after profits.
- Markets will always self-correct.
People relied on market discipline - excessive risk taking will be limited by cost of debt financing risk of losses at insolvency. BUT, there was no plan for resolving insolvency systemically important financial firms without triggering or deepening a crisis.
People started saying that largest firms are too big to fail, government would save them - moral hazard was created.
The incentive to borrow caused by being too big
to fail and the lack of methods for safely resolving
an insolvency of any of these firms, combined
with the forbearance of regulators, created an
increasingly toxic brew of systemic risk.
Prone to Fail: The Pre-Crisis Financial System
Duffie, D. (2019)
What are the unresolved problems of the financial crisis?
- There is still no known operational planning for US government failure resolution of derivatives clearinghouses
- Regulations have forced the majority of derivatives risk into these clearinghouses, which are the new “too big to fail” financial firms
- A threat that fading memories of the costs of the last crisis will lower the resolve and vigilance of legislatures and financial regulators to monitor changes in practice and to take steps to control socially excessive risk-taking
The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins.
La Porta, Lopez, Schleifer. (2008)
Describe how civil and common law developed.
Common Law: lawyers and property owners wanted to provide strong protections for property and limit the crown’s ability to interfere with markets
Civil Law: originates from Roman Law, adopted by Catholic Church. State-desired.
The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins.
La Porta, Lopez, Schleifer. (2008)
Describe Legal Origin Theory.
A style of social control of economic life. Traces different strategies of common and civil law and how different broad ideas were incorporated into specific legal rules. Despite colonization and conquest, fundamental strategies of these legal systems survived and influenced economic outcomes.
The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins.
La Porta, Lopez, Schleifer. (2008)
Describe common law and civil law.
COMMON LAW: DISPUTE RESOLVING. Seeks to support private market outcomes. English Law. Puts greater emphasis on judicial independence, uses precedents (case law).
CIVIL LAW: POLICY IMPLEMENTING. Seeks to replace outcomes with state - desired allocations. French Law. Puts emphasis on maintaining social order. Strict enforcement rather than interpretation.
The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins.
La Porta, Lopez, Schleifer. (2008)
What economic benefits is common law associated with?
- Better investor protection -> better financial development -> better access to finance -> higher ownership dispersion
- lighter government ownership and regulation -> less corruption -> better functioning labor markets -> smaller unofficial economies (unregistered firms)
- more independent judicial systems -> more secure property rights -> better contract reinforcement
Overall: common law countries have moved sharply ahead civil law in financial development in 20th century
The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins.
La Porta, Lopez, Schleifer. (2008)
Why common law leads to better economic outcomes?
- More respective of private property and contracts
- More emphasis on private contracting rather than central regulation (dispute resolving vs. policy implementing)
- More adaptive framework -> better quality over time
The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins.
La Porta, Lopez, Schleifer. (2008)
How common law and civil law deal with crisis?
Common Law: support market system. State’s presence in general is less pervasive.
Civil Law: repress market system or replace it with state mandates
The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins.
La Porta, Lopez, Schleifer. (2008)
What is the criticism of Legal Origins theory?
It is merely a proxy for other factors influencing legal rules and outcomes (culture, history, politics).
The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins.
La Porta, Lopez, Schleifer. (2008)
Describe 4 propositions by legal origins theory
- Legal rules differ across countries, differences can be measured and quantified.
- Differences in legal rules are accounted for by legal origins significantly
- Historical divergence explains why legal rules differ
- Measured differences in legal rules matter for economic and social outcomes.
The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins.
La Porta, Lopez, Schleifer. (2008)
What is the author’s view on future law?
If the world remains peaceful, globalization will drive the world towards common-law type solutions
The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins.
La Porta, Lopez, Schleifer. (2008)
Does Legal Origins Theory point to overall superiority of common law?
No. It points to superiority of civil law WHEN the problem of disorder is severe. When the markets can work well it is better to support them than to replace them.
Bitcoin. Economics, Technology, and Governance.
Bohme (2015).
What is Bitcoin?
Digital currency. There are no physical bitcoins, only balances kept on a public ledger in the cloud, that – along with all Bitcoin transactions – is verified by a massive amount of computing power. Bitcoins are not issued or backed by any banks or governments, nor are individual bitcoins valuable as a commodity.
It is built on transaction log
Bitcoin. Economics, Technology, and Governance.
Bohme (2015).
What is a transaction log?
A record of all changes made to the database while the actual data is contained in a separate file.
Bitcoin. Economics, Technology, and Governance.
Bohme (2015).
Describe Bitcoin design principles (3)
- First adopted mechanism to provide absolute scarcity of money supply (there are only 21 million bitcoins, after they all have been mined, no further will be created)
- No centralized authority to distribute coins or track
- Issues new currency to private parties at a controlled pace to avoid incentive to maintain bookkeeping system
Bitcoin. Economics, Technology, and Governance.
Bohme (2015).
Describe block chain
Data structure that verifies all Bitcoin activity.
Transaction -> Verifying -> Stored in block -> Hash (given unique code) -> Block chain
- every new transaction is grouped together in a block of recent transactions
- to verify that no unauthorized transactions have been inserted, block is compared to most recently published block -> links blocks -> blockchain (new block added every ~10 minutes)
Bitcoin. Economics, Technology, and Governance.
Bohme (2015).
Describe Bitcoin mining
Encourages users to assist in the primary purpose of mining: to support, legitimize and monitor the Bitcoin network and its blockchain. Because these responsibilities are spread among many users all over the world, bitcoin is said to be a “decentralized” cryptocurrency.
Mining requires big money (as more people try, puzzles to solve to receive bitcoins become harder, increasing computing and electricity requirements).
Bitcoin. Economics, Technology, and Governance.
Bohme (2015).
What does Bitcoin not have?
No governance structure:
- No obligation for financial institution to verify user’s identity
- No prohibition of sales (drugs, hehe)
- Irreversible payments (you ain’t getting money back for accidental purchase)
Bitcoin. Economics, Technology, and Governance.
Bohme (2015).
Name Bitcoin intermediaries
- Currency exchanges
- Digital Wallet Services
- Mixers
- Mining Pools