God as personal Flashcards
Bubers I-it and I-you
I-it is an impersonal relationship with an object e.g human and car
I-thou is a direct reciprocal relationship e.g. between a loving couple
How does Alister McGrath describe the distinction between I-you and I-it
“we know about an it, but we know and are known by a you”
e.g. we know a car has tyres, wheels and an exhaust but this knowledge is not the same as knowing in an I-thou relationship through genuine experience
Challenge- God cannot suffer, Philo
Philo argues God is unchangeable
If God is fixed he cannot be personal as this suggests a change from the divine to human so God cannot suffer
Challenge- Anselm
Argues in the proslogion “You are compassionate in that you save the miserable and spare those who sin against you; you are not compassionate in that you are not affected by any sympathy for misery”
Therefore God is not fully personal
Challenge- Aquinas
Love requires being open and vulnerable and God cannot be fully vulnerable therefore God cannot fully love us
What are Weiandys 5 challenges
Son of God suffered
Transcendent
Distinct onto order
God is immutable
Panentheism
Son of God suffered, not God
Christ experienced human suffering in an authentic manner
However, this was his human not divine nature
Christ lost his human well being and life but was not deprived of his divine perfection as he rose again hence God did not suffer
Transcendent
Weiandy argues Moltmann ignores God’s transcendence(outside the world) for understanding God’s immanence (within the world)
If God was only immanent his actions would be less significant e.g. Jesus’ crucifixion
God exists in his own distinct ontological order
e.g. Holocaust
Moltmann ignores the fact that God occupies an ontologically distinct realm to humans as the creator
The sin and evil which causes humans to suffer is wholly contained in the order and so God as the creator cannot exist in the order he created, he must exist in his own
God is immutable
God cannot experience suffering because his emotional state only changes from a change not within himself but from others involved.
God’s love remains unchanging regardless of his creations actions it just mainfests in different ways i.e. tough love rather than anger during the Babylonian exile
Panetheism
(God is both beyond and within the world)
If God is part of the cosmic order and experiences suffering he will not be all loving so cannot offer salvation and be the saviour that triumphs over evil
God can and did suffer examples
Israelites in Egypt- Plagues, famine and losing first born
Jesus’ crucifixion on the cross
WW1 influence (God did not suffer)
Theologians began to question whether God did experience suffering because if he did why would he allow suffering on the magnitude of World War One?
Martin Luther
Argues God did suffer through Christ
Mark 15.34 “My God, My God why have you forsaken me?”
Moltmanns response to God’s suffering
A perfect God must be able to suffer
“A God who cannot suffer is poorer than any human. For a God who is incapable of suffering is a being who cannot be involved… the one who cannot suffer cannot love either”