God as personal Flashcards

1
Q

Bubers I-it and I-you

A

I-it is an impersonal relationship with an object e.g human and car
I-thou is a direct reciprocal relationship e.g. between a loving couple

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How does Alister McGrath describe the distinction between I-you and I-it

A

“we know about an it, but we know and are known by a you”
e.g. we know a car has tyres, wheels and an exhaust but this knowledge is not the same as knowing in an I-thou relationship through genuine experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Challenge- God cannot suffer, Philo

A

Philo argues God is unchangeable
If God is fixed he cannot be personal as this suggests a change from the divine to human so God cannot suffer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Challenge- Anselm

A

Argues in the proslogion “You are compassionate in that you save the miserable and spare those who sin against you; you are not compassionate in that you are not affected by any sympathy for misery”
Therefore God is not fully personal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Challenge- Aquinas

A

Love requires being open and vulnerable and God cannot be fully vulnerable therefore God cannot fully love us

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are Weiandys 5 challenges

A

Son of God suffered
Transcendent
Distinct onto order
God is immutable
Panentheism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Son of God suffered, not God

A

Christ experienced human suffering in an authentic manner
However, this was his human not divine nature
Christ lost his human well being and life but was not deprived of his divine perfection as he rose again hence God did not suffer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Transcendent

A

Weiandy argues Moltmann ignores God’s transcendence(outside the world) for understanding God’s immanence (within the world)
If God was only immanent his actions would be less significant e.g. Jesus’ crucifixion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

God exists in his own distinct ontological order

A

e.g. Holocaust
Moltmann ignores the fact that God occupies an ontologically distinct realm to humans as the creator
The sin and evil which causes humans to suffer is wholly contained in the order and so God as the creator cannot exist in the order he created, he must exist in his own

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

God is immutable

A

God cannot experience suffering because his emotional state only changes from a change not within himself but from others involved.
God’s love remains unchanging regardless of his creations actions it just mainfests in different ways i.e. tough love rather than anger during the Babylonian exile

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Panetheism

A

(God is both beyond and within the world)
If God is part of the cosmic order and experiences suffering he will not be all loving so cannot offer salvation and be the saviour that triumphs over evil

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

God can and did suffer examples

A

Israelites in Egypt- Plagues, famine and losing first born
Jesus’ crucifixion on the cross

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

WW1 influence (God did not suffer)

A

Theologians began to question whether God did experience suffering because if he did why would he allow suffering on the magnitude of World War One?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Martin Luther

A

Argues God did suffer through Christ
Mark 15.34 “My God, My God why have you forsaken me?”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Moltmanns response to God’s suffering

A

A perfect God must be able to suffer
“A God who cannot suffer is poorer than any human. For a God who is incapable of suffering is a being who cannot be involved… the one who cannot suffer cannot love either”