Global Health Flashcards
global health governance
history
goes back to the 19th century
- 1851: International Sanitary Conference in Paris (to prevent spread of contentious decease)
- 1903: International Sanitation Convention (first international treaty regarding health + provided basis for IO
- 1907 Rome Agreement: Office International d’Hygiene Publique (first international bureaucracy concerning health)
- 1920 League of Nations Health Organization
WHO
1948
UN Specialized Agency
outgrown of the League of Nations Health Organization
League of Nations Health Organization
- mostly research
- controlled mostly by technical experts (medics) rather than diplomats
role of US in WHO
role as hegemon has been influential in the creation of the WHO
*also Brazil really influential
global health regime: a fragmented field
immensely fragmented field
Hard to place decision making at one specific place/actor
- national health ministries
- WHO
- other IOs: WTO, UN HRC, UNICEF)
- informal organizations
- public-private partnerships
- philanthropic foundations
- pharmaceutical companies
Why so many actors?
- Health research is expensive, states don’t have/want to give the money
WHO structure
194 members
- World Health Assembly (plenary body, pooled sovereignty)
- Executive Board (34 members for 3 years)
- Director General + Secretariat (daily activities)
- 6 regional offices = highly decentralized
How do politics come into play in the executive board of the WHO
Was meant as a technical body with technical experts
political aspect:
- at least 3 members should be of the UNSC
Became more and more political:
- countries send diplomats rather than technical experts
decentralized WHO structure
6 regional offices have grown historically
- there was already a regional body dealing with health in the Americas, this has been integrated in the WHO
- kept some freedom/autonomy -> decentralized/complicated (not al regions, bodies of the WHO have an equal say)
- each regional office submits a candidate for Regional Director to the Executive Board
WHO: rule-making
3
- conventions (can’t opt out, not many)
- regulations (members can opt out)
- recommendations and non-binding standards
the WHO is a rule-making organization: it shapes the legal regime
WHO conventions
2
are legally binding, once they are ratified
WHO has 1 convention: Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (2005)
- 178 state parties
WHO regulations
6
- in 5 enumerated areas
- adopted by the assembly, applied to all members by a specific deadline
- legally binding for states that did not file a reservation or opted out
- 1951 International Sanitary Regulations
- 1969 International Health Regulations (IHR)
*both these require reporting by states of outbreaks etc.
WHO Recommendations and non-binding standards
(soft law)
- can have an important impact on domestic law: when the WHO adopts a recommendation, member states have to domestically make a law on this
balancing WHO
- requests from member states and other stakeholders
- technical and scientific work
WHO Air Quality Guideline
4
- 2021
- not legally binding
- content: all air pollution can be dangerous for held
- EU implemented much higher thresholds than the WHO
WHO response global health crises
2003 SARS: travel restrictions pretty much right away, reformed the International Health Regulations (2005)
2014 Ebola: accused of responding to slow as it didn’t want to harm the economies of countries
2019/2020 Covid-19: balancing act between acquiring epidemiological information through WHO mission and enforcing PHEIC