GENDER DIFFERENCES IN MOBILE USE Flashcards
type of OBSERVATION
non-participant
ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS
there will be a significant difference in the number seconds male and female participants spend on their phone whilst on school transport
NULL HYPOTHESIS
There will be no significant difference in the number seconds between male participants and female participants spend on their phone on school transport
SAMPLING TECHNIQUE
opportunity sampling
each observer selected 3 pupils over the age of 16 to observe who attend this school and are travelling on the school train or bus either on the way to or from school
PROCEDURE
- Find a pp that fits the needed characteristics
- Set a 3-minute timer on your phone
- Start a stopwatch when they begin to use their phone, and stop when they stop
- After the 3-minutes is up calculate how long they spent on their phone during those 3-minutes
- Convert the time into seconds
2 STRENGTHS of OPPORTUNITY SAMPLE
(+) opportunity sampling gives us a less biased set of data
(+) it was practical and safe
a WEAKNESS of OPPORTUNITY SAMPLING
(-) due to using school transport we aren’t applying those who walk or a driven home- may produce biased results
RESULTS of the DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS:
mean: F= 135.3 M= 115.5
median: F= 145 M= 159
overall median= 151
low use= </151
high use= >/152
OV and CV SCORES:
OV= 0.132
CV= 3.82
Chi-sqaured= OV>CV
INFERENTIAL TEST used:
Chi squared test = nominal data was used with an independent groups design
LEVEL of PROBABILITY used and why:
0.05- it’s a good compromise between type 1 and type 2 errors
RETAIN or REJECT the NULL HYPOTHESIS:
retain
as the OV is less than the CV for a two-tailed hypothesis at a 5% level of probability the null hypothesis should be retained as the difference is not significant
ETHICAL ISSUES and HOW they were DEALT with:
Right to Privacy- A busy train carriage is not one where there is any expectation of privacy
Confidentiality- no names or any personal data apart from sex were recorded