experimental methods Flashcards
Types of EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
- lab
- field
- quasi
- online research
experimental methods:
LAB EXPERIMENT
takes place in a CONTROLLED, ARTIFICIAL SETTING, using STANDARDISED PROCEDURES and the research WILL MANIPULATE at least the IV
3 STRENGTHS of LAB EXPERIMENTS
(+) EXTRANEOUS VARIABLES can be CONTROLLED
(+) often data collected is QUANTITATIVE and thus HIGHLY OBJECTIVE
(+) uses STANDARDISED PROCEDURES that can be REPLICATED by other researchers.
3 WEAKNESSES of LAB EXPERIMENTS
(-) LOW ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY as they often take place under ARTIFICIAL CONDITIONS
(-) PPs are nearly ALWAYS AWARE they are in a LAB EXPERIMENT- DEMAND CHARACTERISTICS.
(-) SUSCEPTIBLE to EXPERIMENTER EFFECTS
experimental methods:
FIELD EXPERIMENT
an EXPERIMENT that takes place in a NATURAL ENVIRONMENT, often the PPs’ own
2 STRENGTHS of FIELD EXPERIMENTS
(+) HIGHER MUNDANE REALISM, leads to HIGHER ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY
(+) REDUCED DEMAND CHARACERISTICS, the AIMS of the STUDY are LESS APPARENT, leading to REDUCED CHANCES of PPs EFFECTS.
3 WEAKNESSES of FIELD EXPERIMENTS
(-) HARDER to CONTROL EXTRANEOUS and CONFOUDING VARIABLES
(-) RAISES ETHICAL ISSUES, PPs DON’T ALWAYS know they are part of an EXPERIMENT and so CANNOT GIVE INFORMED CONSENT
(-) HARDER to REPLICATE than LAB EXPERIMENTS, leading to ISSUES with RELIABILTY
experimental methods:
QUASI-EXPERIMENT
there are TWO TYPES:
1.NATURAL EXPERIMENTS
the IV is a NATURALLY OCCURING EVENT eg NATURAL DISASTER
- DIFFERENCE STUDIES
the IV is a PRE-EXISTING DIFFERENCE between PPs eg GENDER
in BOTH the IV is NOT DIRECTLY MANIPULATED
STRENGTHS of QUASI-EXPERIMENTS
(+) NATURAL EXPERIMENTS allow psychologists to STUDY REAL PROBLEMS like the EFFECTS of disasters on health
3 WEAKNESSES of QUASI-EXPERIMENTS
(-) CANNOT draw DEFINITE CAUSE and EFFECT conclusions due to IV NOT BEING DIRECTLY MANIPULATED
(-) PPs VARIABLES may HAVE an EFFECT
(-) REPLICATION can be DIFFICULT or IMPOSSIBLE
experimental methods:
ONLINE RESEARCH
mainly QUESTIONNAIRES
STRENGTHS of ONLINE RESEARCH
(+) EASY to OBTAIN LARGE sample sizes
(+) SAMPLE tends to be MORE DIVERSE: RACE + GENDER
(+) CHEAPER than conducting research FACE to FACE
WEAKNESSES of ONLINE RESEARCH
(-) MAY still end up with a BIASED SAMPLE
(-) LIMITED research can take place - MAINLY QUESTIONNAIRES
(-) NO way to know if any EXTRANEOUS + CONFOUNDING variables COULD HAVE AN EFFECT