Gas exchange Flashcards
Describe, using an example, one way that gas exchange organs are adapted to their function (2)
- Large surface area
- Mesophyll cells in plants
- Thin for short diffusion pathway
- Walls of tracheoles in insects
- Steep concentration gradient maintained
- Counter current system in fish gills
Explain why plants that live in the desert often have sunken stomata or stomata surrounded by hairs (2)
- To trap any moist air near the stomata
2. Reduce the concentration gradient from leaf to air, which reduced water loss
(a) How did the scientists ensure they could make a valid comparison between leaves
from different species? (1)
Scientists) used fully grown leaves / used five plants of each (species).
Ignore other references to methodology. Reward only
information provided in the Resource.
Do not accept reference to number of leaves − different
plants were used
(b) Describe a method you could use to find the surface area of a leaf. (3)
- Draw around leaf on graph paper;
Mark as a trio − MP1, MP2 and MP3 OR MP4, MP5 and
MP6. Do not mix and match.
Both aspects needed for mark − drawing and type of paper. - Count squares (however described);
There is no reward for additional detail e.g. dealing with part
squares. - Multiply by 2 (for upper and lower leaf surface);
OR
- Draw around a leaf on paper of known mass (per unit area);
Both aspects needed for mark − drawing and mass of paper. - Cut out and weigh;
- Multiply by 2 (for upper and lower leaf surface
(c) (i) Which species, A or B, would you predict grew in a drier environment?
Explain one feature that caused you to choose this species
(1).
- Smaller surface area
so
less evaporation / less heat absorbed;
Correctly selected feature and the explanation required for 1
mark.
In all marking points − ‘less water loss’ is insufficient as an
explanation but accept transpiration for evaporation or
diffusion. - Thicker leaves
so
greater diffusion distance (for water);
Accept ‘thicker leaves so more water storage’. - Fewer stomata / lower stomatal density
so less diffusion / evaporation (of water); - Smaller surface area to volume ratio
so
less evaporation.
(ii) Other than the features of leaves in the table above, give two features of
leaves of xerophytes.
For each feature explain how it reduces water loss.
- Thick(er) cuticle so increase in diffusion distance / slower (rate of) diffusion; Feature and explanation needed for each mark. Reject other features not related to leaves. Reject features related to water storage. ‘Cuticle’ alone is insufficient (all leaves have a cuticle). Reject suggestion of ‘less’ diffusion, for idea of ‘slower diffusion’, an idea of rate is required.
- Hairs on leaves so reduction in air movements / increase in humidity / decrease in water potential gradient;
- Curled leaves so reduction in air movements / increase in humidity / decrease in water potential gradient;
- Sunken stomata so reduction in air movements / increase in humidity / decrease in water potential gradient.
Q2.Scientists studied the rate of carbon dioxide uptake by grape plant leaves. Grape leaves
have stomata on the lower surface but no stomata on the upper surface.
The scientists recorded the carbon dioxide uptake by grape leaves with three different
treatments:
Treatment 1 − No air-sealing grease was applied to either surface of the leaf.
Treatment 2 − The lower surface of the leaf was covered in air-sealing grease that
prevents gas exchange.
Treatment 3 − Both the lower surface and the upper surface of the leaf were covered in
air–sealing grease that prevents gas exchange.
The scientists measured the rate of carbon dioxide uptake by each leaf for 60 minutes in
light and then for 20 minutes in the dark.
The scientists’ results are shown in the diagram below. ‘
a) Suggest the purpose of each of the three leaf treatments (3)
1. (No grease) means stomata are open OR allows normal CO2 uptake; Allow ‘gas exchange’ for CO2 uptake.
As a control’ is insufficient on its own. 2. (Grease on lower surface) seals stomata OR stops CO2 uptake through stomata OR to find CO2 uptake through stomata OR shows CO2 uptake through cuticle / upper surface; 3. (Grease on both surfaces) shows sealing is effective OR stops all CO2 uptake.
(b) (i) Describe the results shown for Treatment 1.
2
i) 1. (Mean rate of) carbon dioxide uptake was constant and fell after
the light turned off;
Ignore absence of arbitrary units in both marking points.
Both ideas needed for mark.
Accept ‘stayed at 4.5’ as equivalent to ‘was constant’.
- Uptake fell from 4.5 to 0 / uptake started to fall at 60 minutes and
reached lowest at 80 minutes / uptake fell over period of 20
minutes;
One correct use of figures required.
Accept fell to nothing / no uptake for 0.
(ii) The stomata close when the light is turned off.
Explain the advantage of this to the plant. (2)
) 1. (Because) water is lost through stomata;
2. (Closure) prevents / reduces water loss;
3. Maintain water content of cells.
This marking point rewards an understanding of reducing
water loss e.g. reduce wilting, maintain turgor, and is not
related to photosynthesis.
(c) (i) Treatment 2 shows that even when the lower surface of the leaf is sealed
there is still some uptake of carbon dioxide.
Suggest how this uptake of carbon dioxide continues.
) (Carbon dioxide uptake) through the upper surface of the leaf / through
cuticle.
i) In both Treatment 1 and Treatment 2, the uptake of carbon dioxide falls to
zero when the light is turned off.
Explain why. (2)
- No use of carbon dioxide in photosynthesis (in the dark);
- No diffusion gradient (maintained) for carbon dioxide into leaf /
there is now a diffusion gradient for carbon dioxide out of leaf (due
to respiration).
Q3.A scientist used grasshoppers to investigate the effect of composition of air on breathing
rate in insects. He changed the composition of air they breathed in by varying the
concentrations of oxygen and carbon dioxide.
The scientist collected 20 mature grasshoppers from a meadow. He placed the
grasshoppers in a small chamber where he could adjust and control the composition of air
surrounding them. The small chamber restricted the movement of the grasshoppers.
His results for three of the grasshoppers are shown in the table below in the form in which
he presented them.
(a) The percentages of oxygen and carbon dioxide in Column A do not add up to 100%
but in columns C and D they do.
Suggest two reasons for this difference. (2)
- Other gases / nitrogen / water vapour in atmosphere / A;
- Only oxygen and carbon dioxide in gas mixtures / C and D;
- Composition of / gases in A not controlled / composition of gas mixtures
/ C and D controlled
(b) Use all the data to describe the effect of concentration of carbon dioxide on the
breathing rate of grasshoppers. (3)
- Breathing rate lowest when no carbon dioxide / in (pure) oxygen /
B;
Idea of ‘lowest’ must be stated. - (Generally) presence of carbon dioxide increases breathing rate / as
concentration of carbon dioxide increases breathing rate increases /
there is a positive correlation;
A general point incorporating all concentrations. - Breathing rate increases when (carbon dioxide) higher than 0.1% /
concentration in atmosphere / A;
This MP requires a specific comparison to 0.1% or the
atmospheric concentration.
Accept ‘gas mixtures 1 and 2 / C and D’ for ‘higher carbon
dioxide’. - Breathing rate of grasshopper 3 falls in D / 16% / gas mixture 2
(whereas others increase).
Restating data alone is insufficient for any mark point.
(c) One of the different types of air was similar to the air in the meadow where the
grasshoppers were collected. It provides data that might be used to calculate a
mean breathing rate for grasshoppers in the meadow.
(i) Use the data to estimate the mean breathing rate of the three grasshoppers in
the meadow. Show your working (2)
(i) 54;
OR
1. Correct data / column A chosen;
A correct answer of 54 gets 2 marks.
MP1 and MP2 allow a possible mark for an incorrect
calculation or choice of wrong data.
2. Correct calculation of mean from data chosen;
Check − the three values must be from same column.
(ii) The estimate does not provide a reliable value for the mean breathing rate of
all insect species in the meadow.
Other than being an estimate, suggest and explain three reasons why this
value would not be reliable. (3)
(ii) 1. Small sample / only 3 (grasshoppers)
so may not be representative (of all grasshoppers / insects);
2. Grasshoppers are not the only insects / species;
so genetic / behavioural / metabolic differences;
3. (Insects) not all mature / are at different stages of development /
different sizes;
so different metabolic rates;
4. Movement not restricted / not at rest in meadow;
so (rate of) respiration higher;
5. (Naturally-occurring) carbon dioxide concentration lower in
meadow;
so breathing rate lower;
Explanations required, therefore both parts of answer
required for credit in each marking point.
Accept appropriate converse answers.
Accept ‘respiration’ for ‘metabolism’ and vice versa.