Functionalism Flashcards

1
Q

Durkheim

A

Durkheim argued that crime occurs when there is anomie (a lack of value consensus and ‘normlessness’. Crime increased since industrialisation since there has been a breakdown in traditional values e.g. religion and the importance of family. He also argued that crime occurs because it serves a purpose in society. 4 functions - Enables social change, boundary maintenance, social cohesion, early warning device. Safety valve - Davis, prostitution allowed men to release sexual frustrations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Evaluation of Durkheim: Positive

A

Functionalism is useful because it highlights the hidden functions of crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Evaluation of Durkheim: Negative

A

Functionalism focuses on the functions of crimes for wider society as a whole but ignores the impact on individuals with crimes such as murder or rape having no benefit for the individual.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Crime as a response to strain: Merton

A

Everyone has shared goals. People respond to the strain between the goals: Conformists etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Evaluation of Merton: Positive

A

Merton’s work shows the capitalist social structure as the cause of crime as a result of the cultural emphasis on material success.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Evaluation of Merton: Negative

A

However, Box claims that Merton fails to acknowledge that the powerful benefit from the capitalist system and, in particular, the laws that underpin it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Cohen

A

Lower class working boys wants success but cannot achieve their goals because of cultural deprivation leads to educational failure and dead-end jobs. They suffer from status frustration and turn to delinquency to gain an alternative status within their peer group.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Evaluation of Cohen: Positive

A

Cohen explains crime that involves no monetary reward because their delinquent activities are about gaining the status they want, not money.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Evaluation of Cohen: Negative

A

Box believes that Cohen was wrong to assume that these w/c delinquent boys had originally accepted the mainstream values.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Cloward and Ohlin

A

They criticise Cohen for not explaining the diversity of responses found among w/c youth who find the approved means for achieving society’s goals to be blocked. They believe that a person’s reaction to strain will depend on the social environment in which they grow up. Criminal subculture, conflict subculture and retreatist subculture.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Evaluation of Cloward and Ohlin: Positive

A

They explain w/c deviance which is not just concerned with material/monetary gain.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Evaluation of Cloward and Ohlin: Negative

A

Ignores the overlap between their different types of subcultures.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Miller - Focal concerns

A

Commit crime due to focal concerns, he does not believe in value consensus.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Evaluation of Miller: Positive

A

Murray would support Miller’s ideas, arguing there is a distinct underclass whose values encourage deviant and criminal behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Evaluation of Miller: Negative

A

There is little evidence that these focal concerns are restricted to w/c males.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Evaluation of subcultural theories:

A

Feminists would criticise subcultural theorists for being ‘malestream’: Focussing solely on boys. Marxists would also criticise them for ignoring corporate crimes.