Foundational Blueprints Flashcards
A capability does not communicate or expose where, why, or how something is done — only
What is done
A particular ability or capacity that a business may possess or exchange to achieve a specific purpose or outcome
Business capability
Focusing on what a business does provides a method to ___ in ways that can be digested readily by executives and planning teams.
Analyse complex business environments
Delivers a concise, non-redundant, business centric view of the business at its most basic level
The capability map
Encompasses a complete picture of what that business does.
The capability map
Represent the basic building blocks of a business.
Capabilities
Once a capability map is in place, issues, strategies, and plans at any level or within any business unit can leverage a
Common vocabulary.
Basing level 1 capabilities on a distinct business object (e.g., Partner) enables
A separation of concerns from other business objects, such as an Agreement
Establishing a capability unique to a business object ensures that
All aspects of that business object can be managed effectively
Using a Matching capability enables a business object to be associated with
Another business object
The separation of business concerns enables a business to ___, and further relate those objects in a wide of variety of ways needed to further business viability.
Separate the management of partners, customers, agreements, assets, products, and other distinct objects
The separation of business concerns enables a business to separate the management of partners, customers, agreements, assets, products, and other distinct objects, and ___ needed to further business viability.
Further relate those objects in a wide of variety of ways
Four important business concepts that have a direct relationship to a capability:
Organisation, information, value stream, and resources
Represents the decomposition of a business into identifiable units and subunits, including outsourced entities where applicable.
Organisation
Depict “how” a business achieves value for an internal or external stakeholder.
Value streams
The main vehicle for organising a business’s thinking about how capabilities may be arranged, improved, or added to deliver stakeholder value.
Value streams
Represents the business information assets required for an enterprise to accomplish its mission.
Information
Represent materials, technologies, funding, and other assets required to sustain a viable business model.
Resources
It is the power of the relationships between business capability and other aspects of the business that provides the
Visibility required to assess the root cause of an issue and determine what it will take to find and deploy a solution.
If capabilities are __, __, __ and __, management can assess which specific lower-level capabilities are causing the problem.
Poorly deployed, highly fragmented, and poorly coordinated, and cost the company more than they should
Business capability and related business abstractions provide __, __, and a __ that can be institutionalised to address a wide variety of business challenges that emerge on a regular basis.
A vocabulary, analytical discipline, and formal mapping structure
Having a common language for “what” a business does enables
Rapid situation analysis of critical issues and streamlines efforts to craft solutions to those challenges.
Common capabilities provide insight into (4)
Value stream improvement, process streamlining and consolidation, organisational alignment, and IT investment.
Capability-based investment analysis is a growing trend that enables businesses to
Focus efforts on all essential aspects of the business that impact that capability.
Capability based planning allows analysts and planning teams to cut through the surrounding noise and focus on
The portions of the business that require resolution.
Capabilities provide a business-oriented starting point for discussions around strategic planning and
The impacts of those plans from an
enterprise perspective.
Capabilities serve as the common starting point for
tracking
The horizontal and vertical impacts of strategic and tactical directives
Business architecture is established by
The business and for the business.
Capabilities create a baseline for
Business/IT transformation and alignment discussions.
Capabilities provide a ___ that can be leveraged by IT to create deployable services that automate those capabilities.
Concise set of definitions
Establishing a common vocabulary across business units, supported by common information views and value streams, provides a foundation for
Business/IT transformation planning.
Using the business capability as the focal point for __, __, __, and __ allows management to cut through the complexity inherent in most enterprises.
Problem analysis, strategic planning, investment determination, and initiative funding
Offers executives, planning teams, and steering committees a way to communicate “what” must be resolved without initially delving into the details of the “how”.
Capability analysis
Capabilities describe
What a business has the ability to do.
If a business has a given ability, even if it is weak, it is
A capability.
A capability is a short, concise name for a
Particular business ability.
The use of noun structures to label capabilities reinforces
The fact that we are seeking to understand “what” is being done
If the capability map is undergoing constant change after it is established and solidified,
There are probably concepts that have been captured that are not capabilities.
A given capability is defined
Once and only once for a business.
One attribute of a capability is that it can be
Decomposed into finer grain views.
The power behind business capabilities is that they
Bring a collective view of the business into focus.
The capability map is the commonly used business blueprint for depicting a
Set of capabilities for a business.
Presents a logically grouped set of capabilities that are independent of organisational structures, business processes, IT assets, or product offerings.
A business capability map
A complete view of the business and relies on two basic concepts: levelling and stratification.
A business capability map
This approach to capability mapping strives to create a single map for the business.
Top-down, enterprise approach to capability mapping:
Capabilities from this perspective would include all aspects of the business essential to maintaining a viable operational and competitive (from a commercial perspective) enterprise.
Top-down, enterprise approach to capability mapping:
All business units and even outsourced capabilities are rolled into a single map and the map is established based on the collective views and input from each of these business units.
Top-down, enterprise approach to capability mapping:
This map would ultimately encompass a complete and fully rationalised view of the business.
Top-down, enterprise approach to capability mapping:
One advantage of this capability map is that it provides a common vocabulary across the business and can therefore be used to support the analysis and planning of a wide range of initiatives that cross business unit and product line boundaries.
Top-down, enterprise approach to capability mapping:
The downside of this approach is that it takes more senior level business commitment and sponsorship to ensure that the map provides complete, well-aligned views of the business.
Top-down, enterprise approach to capability mapping:
It is not unusual for a business unit to create its own capability map that is bounded by the capabilities of that business unit.
Bottom-up business unit centric approach:
When each business unit capability map is created in isolation, there is little visible commonality across maps.
Bottom-up business unit centric approach:
Business unit specific maps are often seeds for a business-wide capability map.
Bottom-up business unit centric approach:
The upside of this approach is that a capability map can be developed more quickly.
Bottom-up business unit centric approach:
The downside is that such a map would be restricted to projects that have no need to engage with parts of the business operating outside of that business unit.
Bottom-up business unit centric approach:
This mapping approach is similar to the business unit approach only it begins from a top down view and derives detailed maps from a single, high-level perspective.
Derivative capability map approach:
The concept involves creating a common, umbrella capability map for the business that defines capabilities down to at least a level 2 view and ideally a level 3 view.
Derivative capability map approach:
Various business units can leverage these higher level views to create a more detailed decomposition of capabilities for a particular business unit and establish business unit views into the higher level map.
Derivative capability map approach:
The value of this is that, at least at a high level, all business units are using the same language.
Derivative capability map approach:
These business unit views would then require reconciliation, but this reconciliation would be easier than it would in the case of the bottom-up approach
Derivative capability map approach:
This view of a capability map is a variation on the bottom-up approach
Bottom-up, project view:
The uniqueness of this approach is that it can take an even more narrow view of capability mapping than the bottom-up approach
Bottom-up, project view:
Individual divisions with disparate offerings and shared corporate services could map the divisions separately and leverage one capability map for common capabilities.
Mapping capabilities within conglomerates:
This decomposition approach, which can go deeper where appropriate, is a standard way of depicting a capability.
Capability Leveling
Executives and planning teams are commonly interested in
Higher level capabilities
Deployment teams have a greater interest in the
Lower level views
Lower level capabilities achieve a level of granularity that is useful for
Mapping to automated implementations of business logic
Business architecture teams should use common sense when investing in capability decomposition work, decomposing to
The level that is needed based on business priorities and related strategy.
The effort spent in decomposition is balanced by business strategies and demands, as well as
The importance a given capability has in terms of strategic value or customer impact.
Organises sets of capabilities into three categories for planning and analysis purposes.
Capability Map Stratification
Capability map stratification considers capabilities from three perspectives:
Strategic / Direction Setting
Core / Customer-facing
Supporting
The “strategic” layer includes capabilities that often reflect
Executive focal points.
The “core” or more commonly named “customer-facing” tier goes to the heart of what
An enterprise does to ensure viability and thrive in the marketplace.
Customer-facing capabilities are core to a given business because they
Represent the face of the business to the customer.
The “supporting” layer of capabilities represents certain abilities that an organisation must have to
Function as a business.
Customer-facing capabilities are oftentimes where most ___ is being made.
Operational and long-term investment
Supporting capabilities are generally ___ and that is why they are often outsourced.
Non-differentiating capabilities,
stratification provides a break in the capability map that allows planning and execution teams to ___, often focusing on customer-facing capabilities as a group from a planning and investment perspective.
Organise their thinking in more structured ways
The capability map brings the importance of these customer-facing capabilities into focus and
Enables a business to think more clearly on how to best leverage priorities and investments related to these capabilities.
Reference models can be beneficial but also introduce some risks.
Many contain false capability candidates.
If there is no predefined capability list or reference model for a particular industry, start with
The organisation chart.
Note that lower level capabilities inherit ___ so there is no need to track stratification levels for capability levels 2-n because they land in the same tier as capability level 1.
Level 1 capability stratification assignments
- Focus on business objects and concepts.
Capability Mapping Validation Guideline (1/11)
- Determine if a capability is a capability because it describes what the business does.
Capability Mapping Validation Guideline (2/11)
- Consider a capability in terms of its outcome.
Capability Mapping Validation Guideline (3/11)
- Verify that a capability is not a process or value stream.
Capability Mapping Validation Guideline (4/11)
- Ensure that capabilities are unique in terms of intent.
Capability Mapping Validation Guideline (5/11)
- Capabilities are unique based on the information they require and use.
Capability Mapping Validation Guideline (6/11)
- Validate capabilities by roles and resources.
Capability Mapping Validation Guideline (7/11)
- Eliminate redundancies.
Capability Mapping Validation Guideline (8/11)
- Ignore the 80/20 rule.
Capability Mapping Validation Guideline (9/11)
- Do not overgeneralise the business.
Capability Mapping Validation Guideline (10/11)
- If management plans to do something, identify it as a capability.
Capability Mapping Validation Guideline (11/11)
Objects provide a capability ___ is defined under the parent capability based on that object.
Focal point where any capability dependent on a given object for its existence
A second basis for a capability is a
Business concept.
Using the ___ is a good way to derive and validate capabilities and capability hierarchies.
Object/concept focal point
A capability must be a
Self-contained concept that is not procedural in nature.
If two people switched jobs, would they still perform as well performing two similar capabilities?
Validate capabilities by roles and resources.
Consolidate as tightly as possible and reuse capabilities across __, __, and __.
Business units, product lines, and international boundaries.
he capability map is the rare architectural view that allows creation of a single view of
The current state and the target state of the business.
- Establish a candidate list of capabilities.
Drafting a Level 1 Capability Map (1/4)
Refine the candidate list of capabilities list by __, __, and __.
Removing false candidates, consolidating redundancies, and organising dependent objects and concepts under parent capabilities.
Are found when a team accounts for all abilities needed to cover a given tier of a capability map and the remaining capability candidates are found to be extraneous or spurious.
False candidates
- Refine the starter list.
Drafting a Level 1 Capability Map (2/4)
Drafting a working version of a level 1 capability map creates a
Baseline for next steps.
Refinement involves
Customisation.
Refinement involves the
Rationalisation of terms.
While not usually the starting point for many capability mapping efforts, a solid mapping effort tends to yield this important
Rationalisation that can dramatically simplify business complexities.
- Validate the starter list against the organisation chart and industry perspectives.
Drafting a Level 1 Capability Map (3/4)
This is an important reality checkpoint that ensures that obvious business concepts are not completely omitted from the capability map.
Validate the starter list against the organisation chart
A second level of validation involves cross-checking the starter list against
Industry terms and concepts.
- Draft level 1 capability map.
Drafting a Level 1 Capability Map (4/4)
The initial list of business objects will invariably produce a set of valid business objects that are not level 1 capabilities but can serve as the basis
For valid level 2 capabilities.
- Prioritise the capability decomposition approach.
Decomposing the Capability Map (1/5)
In the absence of a specific immediate mandate, a best practice is to take each level 1 capability down to
An initial view of level 2.
The parallel concept for setting prioritisation of the map is to build it out based on
Stratification levels.
A reason to focus on customer-facing capabilities is that most
Major transformation initiatives involve core portions of the business.
- Draft the level 2 capability map.
Decomposing the Capability Map (2/5)
- Decompose capabilities into lower level capabilities based on core business views.
Decomposing the Capability Map (3/5)
Requires deeper knowledge of certain aspects of the business and a degree of stability for levels 1-2.
Going to capability levels 3-n
Mapping teams should establish ___ prior to identifying lower level capabilities.
Definitions for level 1-2 capabilities
- Frame capabilities in terms of their parent capabilities.
Decomposing the Capability Map (4/5)
This is very important to make sure that redundancies are not created and that real capabilities are not left off the map.
Framing capabilities by their parents
Lower level capabilities have more specific but related outcomes to
Their parents.
When framing lower level capabilities, be sure to use qualifying names such as Account Holder Risk Rating as opposed to
An aggregate capability that may appear elsewhere.
- Refine through iteration.
Decomposing the Capability Map (5/5)
Is an essential aspect of capability mapping.
Iteration
Is part of the process of getting a solid capability map that can be readily defended and socialised.
Iteration
Define each capability using a single sentence that defines what it is but not why, when, or how it occurs.
Capability Definition Guideline (1/5)
Do not reuse the terms used within the capability name as a part of the definition.
Capability Definition Guideline (2/5)
Define parent capabilities before decomposing children capabilities.
Capability Definition Guideline (3/5)
Define all capabilities prior to full rollout of the map.
Capability Definition Guideline (4/5)
Refine and test definitions through socialisation and validation cycles.
Capability Definition Guideline (5/5)
Accomplished through a series of facilitated working sessions, which are the centrepiece of the capability mapping effort.
Validate the capability map:
Business professionals participating in these exercises will more readily embrace the capability map and support its use in future business initiatives.
Validate the capability map:
Sessions should be facilitated by a business leader on the capability team and focus on a capability or set of related capabilities relevant to a specific business topic
Validate the capability map:
A general term for validating, communicating, and building support for the capabilities within a capability map.
Socialise the capability map.
Each participant at each step of the way should have the opportunity to informally review and provide feedback on the capability map as it evolves.
Socialise the capability map.
Involves a formal review and finalisation of the work done to this point.
Socialise the capability map.
At a minimum, the original executive team that worked on the initial capability map should be reassembled to review and sign-off on the final capability map.
Socialise the capability map.
Packaging and Publishing the Capability Map 3 Steps:
- Defining the packaging approach.
- Delivering a pictorial capability map.
- Publishing the capability map.
Level 2 capability decomposition, must be reasonably and generally agreed upon by the mapping team prior to
Moving into the next deeper level of decomposition.
Level 2 capabilities typically provide upper level management enough insight into what is included under that capability to give them a comfort level that
These concepts reasonably represent the business and serve as a beginning of planning and investment analysis.
Once the basic capability map has been created, the goal is to leverage the information for planning purposes. This can be done using
A heat map.
We treat heat mapping as an extension to the basic capability mapping effort because it involves
Another level of analysis.
- Assign heat mapping attributes from the lowest level capability up
The capability heat mapping approach (1/7)
- If lower level capabilities are predominantly a single color, apply that color to the next level capability up
The capability heat mapping approach (2/7)
- If there is no clear rollup view due to a mix of colors, use additional attributes to weight a given capability or a different one based on impact or proliferation
The capability heat mapping approach (3/7)
- Continue this process, rolling up capability colors to the highest level of the map
The capability heat mapping approach (4/7)
- Validate these findings broadly with the key players most knowledgeable about those capabilities
The capability heat mapping approach (5/7)
- Refine heat map analysis on a regular basis
The capability heat mapping approach (6/7)
- Use the heat map as one (not the only) input to transformation and related planning and funding activities
The capability heat mapping approach (7/7)
Capability criticality attribute rating - 5
5 = Negligible impact, rarely occurs, almost no internal visibility, no external visibility
Capability criticality attribute rating - 3
3 = Moderate impact, occurs occasionally, moderate internal visibility, limited external visibility
Capability criticality attribute rating - 1
1 = Significant impact, occurs very frequently, pervasive internal visibility, definite external visibility
Distribution Across the Business attribute for capabilities is also called
Proliferation
Capabilities have relationships to (5)
Business units, value streams, information assets, initiatives, and IT assets.
Is important because it identifies the groups of business communities that have an interest in a given capability.
Business unit-to-capability mapping
Is normally the starting point for a transformation discussion.
Business unit-to-capability mapping
Different business units often have misaligned definitions for terms as basic as __, __, or __.
Product, customer, or account.
When the business identifies issues with a value stream, underlying ___ are likely to be the culprit.
Business capabilities that enable that value stream
In relation to value stream issues, __ are likely to require modernisation or automation enablement.
Capabilities
Because value streams map directly to business processes, this concept provides a roadmap for identifying which capabilities need to be improved to further improve a given set of processes.
Capability / Value Stream Mappings
Plays an important role in tactical and strategic planning for business as well as for business/IT alignment.
The business capability
Leveraging a capability-oriented view of the business to address business challenges provides commonality of views across
Business units and between business and the IT organisation.
Pinpointing the capability-based limitations or issues is an objective vehicle for
Moving beyond the solution-first trap.
The capability becomes an agreed upon focal point not just for issue analysis but also for __, __, and __.
Issue resolution, cross-functional investment, and eventual automation.
Once issues have been identified and a vision has been established, the next step in planning a solution is to
Determine what is being done to date to address a particular limitation within a capability.
By determining how many “in flight” projects are currently impacting or planning to impact a set of capabilities under review, executives can assess
The amount of investments already being made to address a particular problem.
If “in flight” projects are viewed collectively, from the ___ and the overlap, incompatibility, or synergy they bring, executives can determine if they should continue funding, consolidate, or even cancel certain initiatives.
Impact they will or will not make on a given capability,
If “in flight” projects are viewed collectively, from the impact they will or will not make on a given capability, and the executives can determine if they should continue funding, consolidate, or even cancel certain initiatives.
Overlap, incompatibility, or synergy they bring,
If “in flight” projects are viewed collectively, from the impact they will or will not make on a given capability, and the overlap, incompatibility, or synergy they bring, executives can determine if they should
Continue funding, consolidate, or even cancel certain initiatives.
Capability- based planning enables executives to discuss where to
Focus funding and how to stage an initiative to gain the most value out of their investments in the least amount of time.
Capability-based cost analysis is one step towards investment analysis, and it involves
Determining what an organisation wants to achieve for one or more capabilities balanced against what it is spending today.
Concepts such as ___ drive much of the transformation roadmap development and initiative deployment.
Capability-based costing and investment analysis
A social unit of people, systematically structured and managed to meet a need or to pursue collective goals on a continuing basis.
Organization
Not constrained by corporate or legal boundaries.
Organization
The fact that the organisation could not effectively fulfil its mission in the absence of these third parties and related capabilities means that the business architecture must
Recognise and accommodate the mapping of these third parties in some fashion.
A logical element or segment of a company (such as accounting, production, marketing) representing a specific business function, and a definite place on the organisational chart, under the domain of a manager. Also called department, division, or a functional area.
Business unit
May be an enterprise, an individual business unit such as Marketing or Accounting, a third party entity, or a less formally recognised but important concept such as a collaborative team.
Business unit
A process or operation that is performed routinely to carry out a part of the mission of an organization
Function
A business blueprint that depicts business units, organisational decomposition, and other types of organisation-oriented relationships.
An organization map
Incorporate additional aspects of a business where appropriate.
Extended organisation maps
Traditional hierarchy charts are becoming increasingly irrelevant in today’s
Highly networked environments.
A common view within various types of organisational structures.
Hub concept
Are represented as collaborative teams such as a steering committee, focus group, or even a board of directors.
Networks of relationships
Do not facilitate an accurate depiction of horizontal relationships
Hierarchical models