forensics paper 3 completed Flashcards
up to moral reasoning cognitive explanations
what are the two types of offender pro filling
top up approach
bottom up approach
a01 of top down approach
FBI in USA developed
typology approach (how crime is committed and what is left at the scene) develop type of offender and characteristsics
two categories
disorganised - unplanned attack, victim not targeted, depersonalised, socially awkward, poor employment
organised - planned, victim targeted, personalises victim, weapon is absent, skilled ocupation
describe the characteristics of an organised offender (top down approach)
planned
victim targeted
personalises victim
aggressive acts
weapon is absent
body hidden from view
skilled occupation
has partner
watches media of crime
describe the characteristics of a disorganised offender (top down approach)
unplanned attack
victim not targeted
victim depersonalised
unplanned violence
body visible
weapon is present
low intelligence
socially awkward
poor employment
not interested in crime
name the 4 stages to build a profile - crime scene analysis
stage 1- data assimilation
stage 2- crime classification
stage 3- reconstruction
stage 4- profile generation
a01 of bottom up approach
british approach david canter
data driven, info put into data base and matched on similar types of crime
3 features
1. interpersonal coherence
2. time and place
3. forensic awareness
geographical profilling
canter and larkin circle theory
what are the three features of the bottom up approach
- interpersonal coherence, way to interact with victim in every day life
- time and place, time and location relationship to home/ job
- forensic awareness- previous encounters with criminal justice systems offenders
describe geographical profilling - bottom up approach
canter and youngs
cues from place of crime which relates to offender
rossmo - hunting patterns for where the criminal is located
offenders restrict work to areas of familiar with spatial patterns
gives us key info about base and where they are likely to strike next
jeaprody surface
what is the term for the definition in bottom up approach ‘insight into where the killer may strike next and their base’
jeaprody surface
describe canter and larkins circle theory, 2 models
- marauder - close proximity to home
- commuter- travels distance from home
what are the three biological explanations for crime
- atavistic form
- genetics
- neural
a01 atavistic form lombrosso
criminals are genetic throwbacks
supspecies biologically different
criminals similar to lower primates
theory written around darwin
criminals are less evolved
atavism= tendency to convert back to ancestral type
atavistic form characteristics
markers that are linked to crime from birth
examined features of hundreds to italian convicts
living & dead- 40% accounted for features
-narrow sloping brow
-prominant jaw
-high cheekbones
-facial symmetry
-dark skin
according to atavistic form, what characteristics should a murderer have
blodo shot eyes
curly hair
long ears
according to atavistic form, what characteristics should a
glinting eyes
fleshy lips
projecting ears
according to atavistic form, what characteristics should a
thin lipy
‘reedy’
genetics explanation for crime a01
offending behaviour due to specific gene predisposed to individual
candidate gene research MAOA gene ‘warrior gene’
linked to aggression and violence
CDH13 cause abuse and ADHD
tiihonen et al - 5-10% all violent crimes in finland due to gene abnormalities MAOA AND CDH13
diathesis stress- candidate genes alone arent good enough to explain behaviour
what are the two candidate genes in genetics explanation
MAOA- ‘warrior gene’
CDH13- found in aggression and ADHD
what theory is involved in genetics explanation
diathesis stress
explain diathesis stress for explaining criminal behaviour including capsi study
candidate genes arent good enough alone to explain
epigenetics - genes are switched on and off, affected environmental factors, person may be genetically vulnerable only expressed if right environmental factors are present
CAPSI- longitudinal study, 1000 new zealand ppts, assessed at 26 for antisocial behaviour, 12% of men had deffective MAOA gene experienced maltreatment as a baby, 44% violent crimes responsible
a01 neural explanation for criminality
brain difference in non offenders and offenders structural differences in the level of neurotransmitters
observation that criminals have hea dinjury HARMON found 8.5% US population have brain injury, 60% prison population
RAINE suggested pre frontal cortex is different, = regulated emotions and moral decision making
limbic system- implicated in violenr oddences
tries to start fight or flight, flight isnt working
makes us angry PFC controls
what is the pre frontal cortex for
regulating emotions and moral decision making
what are the 3 brain structures in neural explanation to explain criminality
pre frontal cortex
limbic system
limbic system amaygdala
describe the limbic system in neural explanations for criminality
tries to start fight or flight
flight doesn’t work so you fight
makes us angry, pfc controls and is impulsive
subcortial structure contains other structures, amagdala for motivation, response to threats
raine found asyymetries in limbic system (amygdala)
what is psychodynamic explanation for offending a01
rely on childhood experience
freud - superego
superego in psychodynamic explanation for offending
develops from identification from same sex parent in phallic stage, can internalise moral values
morality principle makes us feel good and guides us to socially approved behaviour
can feel guilt, emphasise
blackburn- if superego is inadequate the ID ‘free rein’ and act as pleasure principle, without superego criminal behaviour is inevitable
- types