Family diversity Flashcards

1
Q

What family type does Parson like?

A

Nuclear family with a division of labour between husband and wife.

  • other family types can be considered as dysfunctional, abnormal or even deviant > less able to perform the functions of nuclear family
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What perspective do the New Right have on the family?

A
  • Have a conservative and anti-feminist perspective on the family. They are firmly opposed to family diversity.
  • Traditional conventional nuclear family: married couple, dependent children w a clear cut division of labour between the breadwinner husband and house maker wife
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What do The New Right see the Traditional conventional nuclear family as?

A
  • ‘Natural’ and based on fundamental biological differences between men and women. Family is the cornerstone of society.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What changes in family patterns do the New Right oppose?

A

Cohabitation, gay marriage and lone parenthood

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What do they argue that the decline of the traditional nuclear family and the growth of family diversity are the cause of?

A

Many social problems.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why are the New Right are concerned about the growth of lone-parent families?

A

They see as resulting from the breakdown of couple relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How do the New Right see lone-parent families as harmful to children?

A

They argue that:

  • Lone mothers cannot discipline their children properly.
  • Lone-parent families leave boys without an adult male role model, resulting in educational failure, delinquency and social instability.
  • Such families are also likely to be poorer and thus a burden on the welfare state and taxpayers.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What do the The New Right claim that the main cause of lone-parent families is?

A

The collapse of relationships between cohabiting couple.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did Benson (2006) find into his study of lone parent families?

A

He found that, over the first three years of the baby’s life, the rate of family breakdown was much higher among cohabiting couples.
- 20%, compared with only 6% among married couples. More stable when married.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

In the New Right view what can only provide a stable environment in which to bring up children?

A

Marriage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

In Benson’s view why is marriage is more stable?

A

It requires a deliberate commitment to each other, whereas cohabitation allows partners to avoid commitment and responsibility.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What do the New Right thinkers argue that only a return to ‘traditional values’, including the value of marriage can prevent?

A

Social disintegration and damage to children.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What do the New Right thinkers regard laws and policies such as easy access to divorce, gay marriage and widespread availability of welfare benefits as?

A

Undermining the conventional family.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does Benson therefore argues that government needs to do?

A

Encourage couples to marry by means of policies that support marriage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How does Oakley (1997) criticise the New Right?

A
  • Oakley (1997) argues that the New Right wrongly assume that husbands and wives’ roles are fixed by biology.
  • Cross-cultural studies show great variation in the roles men and women perform within the family.
    -Oakley believes that the New Right view of the family is a negative reaction against the feminist campaign for women’s equality.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What do other critics of the New Right argue?

A

There is no evidence that children in lone-parent families are more likely to be delinquent than those brought up in a two-parent family of the same social class.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is Chester (1985) view?

A
  • Recognises that there has been some increased family diversity in recent years. Doesn’t regard this as very significant, nor does he see it in a negative light.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What does Chester (1985) we families are moving to?

A
  • From the dominance of the traditional or conventional nuclear family, to what he describes as the ‘neo-conventional family’.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What does conventional family mean?

A

Division of labour between a male breadwinner and a female homemaker.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What does neo-conventional family mean?

A
  • Neo-conventional family as a dual-earner family in which both spouses go out to work and not just the husband.
  • This is similar to the symmetrical family described by Young and Willmott
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What does Chester (1985) that people are doing now?

A
  • He argues that most people are not choosing to live in alternatives to the nuclear family (such as lone-parent families) on a long-term basis, and the nuclear family remains the ideal to which most people aspire.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Why does Chester (1985) argue that people are not part of a nuclear family at any one time?

A
  • Largely due to the life cycle.
  • Many of the people who are currently living in a one-person household, such as elderly widows, divorced men or young people who have not yet married, were either part of a nuclear family in the past or will be in the future.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Why does Chester (1985) argue statistics on household composition are thus misleading?

A

They are merely a snapshot of a single moment in time. They don’t show us the fact that most people will spend a major part of their lives in a nuclear family.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What number of patterns does Chester as evidence of his view that little has changed?

A
  • Most people live in a household headed by a married couple
  • Most marriages continue until death, Divorce has increased, but most divorcees remarry.
  • Cohabitation has increased, but for most couples it is a temporary phase before marrying or re-marrying. Most couples get married if they have children.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What family type does Chester see as dominant?

A

Nuclear family

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What is the only important difference between Chester’s view and that of the functionalists?

A

Chester sees a change from a conventional to a neo-conventional nuclear family where both spouses play an ‘instrumental’ or breadwinner role.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What do the Rapoports (1982) argue about diversity?

A

Diversity is of central importance in understanding family life today.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What do the Rapoports believe?

A
  • We have moved away from the traditional nuclear family as the dominant family type, to a range of different types.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

What do the Rapoports argue that families in Britain have adapted to what society?

A

A pluralistic society - that is, one in which cultures and lifestyles are more diverse.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

In the Rapoport’s view what does family diversity reflect?

A

Reflects greater freedom of choice and the widespread acceptance of different cultures and ways of life in today’s society.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Unlike the New Right, What do the Rapoports see diversity as?

A

A positive response to people’s different needs and wishes, and not as abnormal or a deviation from the assumed norm of a ‘proper nuclear family.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

What are the five different types of family diversity in Britain today according to the Rapoports

A
  1. Organisational diversity
  2. Cultural diversity
  3. Social class diversity
  4. Life stage diversity
  5. Generational diversity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

What is Organisational diversity?

A
  • Differences in the ways family roles are organised.
  • E.g. some couples have joint conjugal roles and two wage-earners, while others have segregated conjugal roles and one wage-earner.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

What is Cultural diversity?

A
  • Different cultural, religious and ethnic groups have different family structures.
    E.g. there is a higher proportion of female-headed lone-parent families among African-Caribbean households and a higher proportion of extended families among Asian households.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

What is Social class diversity?

A
  • Differences in family structure are partly the result of income differences between households of different social classes. Likewise, there are class differences in child-rearing practices.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

What is Life-stage diversity?

A
  • Family structures differ according to the stage reached in the life cycle - E.g. young newlyweds, couples with dependent children, retired couples whose children have grown up and left home, and widows who are living alone.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

What is Generational diversity?

A
  • Older and younger generations have different attitudes and experiences that reflect the historical periods in which they have lived.
  • E.g. they may have different views about the morality of divorce or cohabitation.
38
Q

What do view modernist approaches take?

A

Structural or ‘top down’ view.

39
Q

What do modernist approaches see the family as?

A

They see the family as a structure that shapes the behaviour of its members so that they perform the functions society requires.

40
Q

What do modernist approaches argue individuals don’t have?

A

Argue individuals have no real choice about the pattern of family life.
- In terms of family patterns, our behaviour is orderly, structured and predictable: most people marry, go on to have children and so on. Limited variety in family life, such as the five types of diversity.

41
Q

What do Postmodernists like Cheal (1993) say we no longer live in?

A
  • No longer live in ‘modern’ society with its predictable, orderly structures such as the nuclear family.
42
Q

What do Postmodernists like Cheal (1993) say society has entered?

A
  • Society has entered a new, chaotic, postmodern stage.
  • No longer one single, dominant, stable family structure such as the nuclear family.
43
Q

What do Postmodernists like Cheal (1993) argue family structures have become?

A
  • Have become fragmented into many different types and individuals now have much more choice in their lifestyles, personal relationships and family arrangements
44
Q

What are advantages of greater diversity and choice?

A

It gives individuals greater freedom to plot their own life course - to choose the kind of family and personal relationships that meet their needs.

45
Q

What are disadvantages of greater diversity and choice?

A

Greater freedom of choice in relationships means a greater risk of instability, since these relationships are more likely to break up.

46
Q

What does Stacey (1998) argue?

A

That greater freedom and choice has benefited women. Enabled them to free themselves from patriarchal oppression and to shape their family arrangements to meet their needs.

47
Q

What did Stacey’s (1998) Case studies of post modern families in Silicon Valley California find?

A

She found that women rather than men have been the main agents of changes in the family.

48
Q

What’s an example of women rather than men being the main agents of changes in the family?

A
  • Many of the women she interviewed had rejected the traditional housewife-mother role.
  • They had worked, returned to education as adults, improved their job prospects, divorced and re-married. These women had often created new types of family that better suited their needs.
49
Q

What does Stacey call one of these new family structures?

A
  • Divorce-extended family - whose members are connected by divorce rather than marriage.
  • May include former in-laws, such as mother- and daughter-in-law, or a man’s ex-wife and his new partner.
50
Q

What did Stacey find in one of her Case studies of a divorce extended family?

A
  • They helped each other financially and domestically, e.g. by exchanging lodgers in response to the changing needs of their households.
51
Q

What does Morgan (1996; 2011) argue?

A

Pointless trying to make large-scale generalisations about ‘the family’ as if it were a single thing, as functionalists do.
- A family is whatever arrangements those involved choose to call their family.

52
Q

What have Giddens and Beck views become known as?

A

The individualisation thesis.

53
Q

What do Giddens and Beck explore?

A
  • The effects of increasing individual choice upon families and relationships.
54
Q

What does the individualisation thesis argue?

A

The traditional social structures such as class, gender and family have lost much of their influence over us.

55
Q

What are the differences between today’s society and the past according to the individuation thesis?

A
  • In past, people’s lives were defined by fixed roles that largely prevented them from choosing their own life course. E.g. everyone was expected to marry and to take up their appropriate gender role.

In today’s society have fewer such certainties or fixed roles to follow.

56
Q

According to the individualisation what have we become?

A

Freed or ‘disembedded’ from traditional roles and structures, leaving us with more freedom to choose how we lead our lives.

57
Q

What does Giddens (1992) argues that in recent decades the family and marriage have been transformed by?

A

Greater choice and a more equal relationship between men and women.

58
Q

Why does Giddens (1992) argue that this transformation of greater choice/equality has occurred because of?

A
  1. Contraception. Allowed sex and intimacy rather than reproduction to become the main reason for the relationship’s existence.
  2. Women have gained independence as a result of feminism and because of greater opportunities in education and work.
59
Q

What does Giddens argues that in the past, traditional family relationships were held together by?

A

External forces such as the laws governing the marriage contract and by powerful norms against divorce and sex outside marriage.

60
Q

What does Giddens argue that couples nowadays are allowed to do?

A
  • Define their relationship themselves rather than simply acting out roles that have been defined in advance by law or tradition.
  • E.g. couples nowadays don’t have to marry to have children and divorce is readily accessible so they don’t have to stay together ‘til death do us part’
61
Q

According to Giddens, what holds relationships together nowadays compared to before?

A
  • Today is no longer law, religion, social norms or traditional institutions.
  • Instead, intimate relationships nowadays are based on individual choice and equality.
62
Q

What does Giddens call intimate relationships based on individual choice and equality.?

A

The pure relationship.

63
Q

How does Giddens see the pure relationship?

A

He sees the pure relationship as typical of today’s late modern society, in which relationships are no longer bound by traditional norms.

64
Q

What is the key feature of the pure relationship?

A
  • Exists solely to satisfy each partner’s needs. Likely to survive only so long as both partners think it is in their own interest to do so.
  • Couples stay together because of love, happiness or sexual attraction, rather than because of tradition, a sense of duty or for the sake of the children.
65
Q

Due to the pure relationship, what are individuals are thus free to?

A

Free to choose to enter and to leave relationships as they see fit.

  • Relationships become part of the process of the individual’s self-discovery or self-identity: trying different relationships becomes a way of establishing ‘who we are’.
66
Q

What doe Giddens say that with more choice, personal relationships inevitably become?

A
  • Become less stable.
  • The pure relationship is a kind of ‘rolling contract’ that can be ended more or less at will by either partner, rather than a permanent commitment.
  • Produces greater family diversity by creating more lone-parent families, one person households, stepfamilies.
67
Q

What does Giddens sees same-sex relationships as?

A

Leading the way towards new family types and creating more democratic and equal relationships.

68
Q

Why does Giddens argue that relationships are becoming more democratic and equal?

A
  • Same-sex relationships are not influenced by tradition to the extent that heterosexual relationships are.
  • Able to develop relationships based on choice rather than on traditional roles.
69
Q

What has this enabled those in same-sex relationships to negotiate ?

A
  • Negotiate personal relationships and to actively create family structures that serve their own needs, rather than having to conform to pre-existing norms in the way that heterosexual couples have traditionally had to do.
70
Q

What did Weeks (2000) find?

A
  • Found that friendship networks functioned as kinship networks for gay men and lesbians.
71
Q

What does Beck (1992) argue?

A
  • We now live in a ‘risk society’ where tradition has less influence and people have more choice. We are more aware of risks.
72
Q

Why do we now live more in a ‘risk society’ with more choice?

A
  • Making choices involves calculating the risks and rewards of the different options open to us.
  • Before people’s roles were more fixed by tradition and rigid social norms dictated how they should behave.
  • E.g. expected to marry for life and, once married, men were expected to play the role of breadwinner and disciplinarian and to make the important financial decisions, while women took responsibility for the housework, childcare and care of the sick and elderly.
73
Q

What does Beck (1992) argue that this patriarchal family provide?

A

A stable and predictable basis for family life by defining each members role and responsibilities

74
Q

How has the patriarchal family has been undermined by two trends?

A
  1. Greater gender equality - challenged male domination in all spheres of life. Women now expect equality both in work and marriage.
  2. Greater individualism - peoples actions are influenced by calculations of their own self interest rather than by a sense of obligation to others.
75
Q

What is the negotiated family?

A

Negotiated families do not conform to the traditional family norm, but vary according to the wishes and expectations of their members, who decide what is best for themselves by negotiation. They enter the relationship on an equal basis.

76
Q

Although the negotiated family is more equal than the patriarchal family, why it is less stable?

A
  • Individuals are free to leave if their needs are not met. This instability leads to greater family diversity by creating more lone-parent families, one person households, re-marriages and so on.
77
Q

Why does Beck describe the family as the ‘zombie family’?

A
  • It appears to be alive, but in reality it is dead.
  • People want it to be a haven of security in an insecure world, but today’s family cannot provide this because of its own instability.
78
Q

Who are two sociologists who take a personal life perspective?

A

Smart (2007) and May (2013)

79
Q

What do Smart (2007) and May (2013) agree that there is now?

A
  • There is now more family diversity but they disagree with Beck and Giddens’ explanation of it.
80
Q

What are some criticisms of the individualisation thesis?

A
  1. Exaggerates how much choice people have about family relationships today. Traditional norms that limit people’s relationship choices have not weakened as much as it claims
  2. Wrongly sees people as disembedded, ‘free-floating’, independent individuals. Ignores the fact that our decisions and choices about personal relationships are made within a social context.
  3. Ignores the importance of structural factors such as social class inequalities and patriarchal gender norms in limiting and shaping our relationship choices.
81
Q

What does May argue that Giddens’ and Beck’s view of the individual is simply?

A

‘An idealised version of a white, middle-class man’.
- They ignore the fact that not everyone has the same ability as this privileged group to exercise choice about relationships.

82
Q

What did sociologists from the personal life perspective propose as an alternative to the individualisation thesis?

A

Smart calls this the ‘connectedness thesis’

83
Q

What is the ‘connectedness thesis’?

A
  • Instead of seeing us as disembedded, isolated individuals with limitless choice about personal relationships, Smart argues that we are fundamentally social beings whose choices are always made ‘within a web of connectedness’.
84
Q

According to the connectedness thesis, what do we live within networks of?

A
  • Existing relationships and interwoven personal histories, and these strongly influence our range of options and choices in relationships.
85
Q

What did Finch and Mason’s (1993) study of extended families find?

A
  • Although individuals can to some extent negotiate the relationships they want, they are also embedded within family connections and obligations that restrict their freedom of choice.
86
Q

Why did Finch and Mason’s (1993) study of extended families findings challenge the notion of the pure relationship?

A

Families usually include more than just the couples that Giddens focuses on, and even couple relationships are not always ‘pure’ relationships that we can walk away from at will.
- Parents who separate remain linked by their children, often against their wishes.

87
Q

What does Smart therefore emphasises the importance of?

A

Always putting individuals in the context of their past and the web of relationships that shape their choices and family patterns.

88
Q

What does the connectedness thesis also emphasises the role of?

A

The role of the class and gender structures in which we are embedded.

89
Q

What do class and gender structures limit?

A
  • Limit our choices about the kinds of relationships, identities and families we can create for ourselves.
  • After a divorce, gender norms generally dictate that women should have custody of the children, which may limit their opportunity to form new relationships. By contrast, men are freer to start new relationships and second families.
  • Men are generally better paid than women and this gives them greater freedom and choice in relationships.
90
Q

What does May argues about class and gender structures?

A
  • These structures are not disappearing, they are simply being re-shaped. E.g. while women in the past 150 years have gained important rights in relation to voting, divorce, education and employment, this does not mean that they now have it all.
  • Women can now pursue traditionally ‘masculine’ goals such as careers, they are still expected to be heterosexual
91
Q

Why do critics argue that the personal life perspective does not see increased diversity simply as a result of greater freedom of choice, as Beck and Giddens do?

A

Argue that it emphasises the importance of social structures in shaping the freedoms many people now have to create more diverse types of families.