Family: Care and Protection of Children Flashcards
INTRO What are non-legal responses to the care and protection of children??
INTRO Wood inquiry, keep them safe, OOHC via NGOs, The National Framework for protecting children Framework 2009-2020 (COAG), NSW Health, Family Referral Services, Child Wellbeing Units in Gov deps, (ATSI) NGOs
INTRO What has happened to societal values towards the care and protection of children?
INTRO They have changed, there is an increased awareness regarding issues of child abuse and neglect. This awareness and concern has led to an array of legal an d non-legal child protection mechanisms
INTRO What the issues to this state matter mainly governed by?
INTRO The Children and Young Persons (Care and protection) Act 1998 (NSW). There are federal acts as well as outlined by Australian Constitution.
INTRO Have laws and NL responses regarding the issue improved and if not, what has hindered progress?
INTRO Generally yes, however, the complexity and delicate nature of the issue due to the impact of responses on the well being of children have meant that the progression of these responses have been limited in certain ways.
P2 What have legal responses done over time?
P2 Evolved in response to perceived failures of existing law, media and community pressure, as well as reports by independant organisations.
P2 What does Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 NSW state?
P2 It is a crime to abuse a child. Additionally, The Child Protection Act 1999 provides for the mandatory reporting of children at significant riskThe 2012 Child Protection Act provides for working with children checks.
P2 What does the Children and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 (NSW) and the Child Care and Protection ACt aim to do?
P2 ensure the rights of children and deter individuals from abusing or allowing the abuse of children.
What are the consequences of severe abuse and neglect?
parents or guardians can be convicted under the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) or can be issued AVOs by Police to act as a deterrent.
End of P2 statement
Whilst these attempt to deter offenders and protect children, the high prevalence of child abuse and neglect indicates that the laws are not effective in that they are not easily enforced or recognised by the entire community.
P3 Statement: What does the legal system also recognise?
The need to fast track serious cases of abuse to protect children from future harm. This was achieved through the intro of Magellan Program in 2003 to Family Courts, aiming to address and resolve cases within 6 months. The program also provides children with access to Independent Children’s Lawyers, improving their access to the law.
P3 What did the 2007 AIFS report into the Magellan Program reveal?
the cases were quickly resolved and that participants felt “better outcomes were achieved for children and their families”.
P3 What did the 2007 (Magellan) AIFS report indicate?
The success of the program, which was partly due to better case management and resource efficiency as indicated by the study.
P3 Why are Magellan programs still criticised?
6 months is too long and such a wait could be detrimental to child’s well being. This could be addressed through the increased provision of judges into the Family Court.
P3The 2016 SMH article
P4 ‘Judges ‘hard to recruit, retain’ because they don’t receive pensions’ AG George Brandis stated that he understanded the need for more judges, however stated that ‘there are resource implications’. NEED FOR IMPROVED RESOURCE EXPENDITURE THEN TO REDUCE TIME!
P4 What is the main gov body responisble for child protection?
P4 Family and Community Services (FACS) which respond and investigate child protection issues as well as supports families to prevent future child abuse. As last resort remove children into OOHC, even though not always best solution, recognising best interests thru Emergency Care and Protection Orders.
P4 What does FACS play a crucial role in?
P4 Responding to and preventing child abuse and negelct, achieving successful outcomes for many child victims.
P5 What cases highlighted that child at risk of serious harm can still be missed?
P5 Deaths of children Dean Shillinsworth and Shelly Ward at the hands of their parents in 2007. Sparked media & community outrage toward FACS due to ineffective responses to both children and despite numerous reports made. (Daily Telegraph ‘Brief, Brutal Lives of forgotten children)