Factors Effecting eye Witness Testimony Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is eye witness testimony (EWT)

A

Someone who witnessed a crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is misleading info

A

False info given to eyewitness’ eg leading questions and post event discussion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are leading questions

A

A question that suggests a certain answer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Leading questions study

A

Loftus and Palmer - lab experiment - 45 students
- split into 5 groups and shown a video of a car crash
- then asked how fast where the card going when they X into each other
- X was a different verb each group was given Eg smashed, collided, bumped, hit, contracted.

Results -
The more intense the verb was the higher the mean estimate of the speed was eg smashed 40.8 mph and hit- 34 mph

Conclusion- leading questions have an effect on EWT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Evaluation of leading question study and IV and DV

A

✅- real life application- police can’t use leading questions in interviews
✅-lab experiment can be replicated
❌- lab experiment demand characteristics
❌- lacks ecological validity cause students weren’t out under the stress as a real EWT would be.
❌- students may not drive so harder to estimate speed

IV- verb
DV- estimated speed mph

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Loftus study two

A

150 students split into 3 groups
Shows video of car crash
Asked how fast was the cars going when they … into each other (with diff verb)
-then asked if there was broken glass
- the more intense the verb the more likely they’re to say yes
Smash - 16 yes
Hit- yes 7

Conclusion -
Leading questions can effect EWT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Evaluation of loftus and Palmer 2

A

✅- lab experiment - control

❌-lack ecological validity video not real so didn’t feel stress- don’t know if leading questions would effect EWT In real life.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Study against loftus

A

Yuville
- 13 witness’ to robbery and murder were re-interviewed 5 months later with two leading questions.
- man robbed store and shot shop keeper. Robber got shot and killed

Results- leading questions had no effect on EWT they still have accurate recall of the crime.
The more distressed EW was the more accurate account of crime was.

Conclusion-EW of real life crime have accurate meme routes when the incident involves high levels of anxiety and weapons.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Role of anxiety on EWT

A

Yerkes Dodson law
- performance improves as arousal increases up to an optimum point but once it exceeds optimal point performance decreases.
-medium levels of anxiety improve accuracy of EWT but too high or too low might interfere with accuracy.

Optimal level of anxiety improves recall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is Post- event discussion

A

When two witnesses of an event discuss what they have seen.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Post-event discussion study

A

Gabbet
- study the effect of post event discussion on EWT
- 60 students 60 elderly independent group design
- 2 conditions tested individually or in pairs
-watch video of robbery and were told they were watching the same video but only one saw the girl actually steal
- the pairs discussed the crime and took questionnaire

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Results and conclusion of posts event discussion
And evaluation

A

Results - 71% of pairs recalled info they hadn’t seen and 69% said they saw the girl steak despite not seeing her do it.

Conclusion - shows issue of post event discussion on accuracy of EWT
❌- lacks ecological validity not a real crime so no real stress.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the effects of post event discussion ON EWT

A

-source monitoring theory
- conformity theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is source monitoring theory

A

Can’t remember the source of info even tho they can recall it.
- don’t know if it was their memory or someone else’s- distorts their own memory of the event

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the conformity theory

A

Change their recall of event to match the accounts of the other EWs either for-
- social approval or because they genuinely believe they must be weong if everyone else saw the same thing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the weapon focus effect on EWT
And study against it and evaluation of the study

A

If a person is carrying a weapon witness are more likely to look at it thente face of the suspect
-the presence of the weapon increases anxiety takin focus away from offender therefore leading to poorer EWT.

Study -yuille
-13 real-life witnesses to a shooting
Interviewed them 5 months after the event and compared their report to the report taken at the time.
-scored for number of details and how stressed they were
-the more stressed the witnesses were the more accurate their account of the crime was.
-shows anxiety does not affect memory

✅- high ecological validity real stress and anxiety
❌- psychological harm asking people to recall a traumatic event could be distressing