F2 Flashcards
Cash Equivalent
Very liquid asset, short term investments that mature within 3 months since acquisition
IFRS requirement in statement of Accting policies
Statement of compliance with IFRS
Off balance sheet financing example
Operating leases
Statement of significant accounting policies position in notes
1st or 2nd item
What related to estimating must be disclosed?
Known trends and uncertainties (warnings)
When does a concentration make an entity vulnerable?
when there is a risk of loss that could be mitigated through diversification
Concentrations should be disclosed if the following criteria are met
- The concentrations exist
- Puts entity at severe risk in the near term
- Reasonably likely the worst could occur
When will an entity prepare financials under liquidation method of accounting?
When liquidation is imminent
If there is substantial doubt about going concern, what must be disclosed in the notes?
- Condition/ events that gave rise to substantial doubt about going concern
- Management’s evaluation
- Management’s plan to either alleviate substantial doubt (if they believe it will be) or how they intend it mitigate (if they believe it won’t)
Difference between IFRS and GAAP disclosure of judgements and estimates in notes
GAAP does NOT require disclosure of judgements. IFRS does. Both require disclosure of estimates.
What are the 3 inputs in the hierarchy of inputs for fair value?
- Active markets
- Interest rates / inactive markets / similar goods
- Estimates
Management is required to evaluate the going concern of the company for the period of one year AFTER
The financials -issuance- date NOT the financials date
IFRS vs GAAP biggest difference with going concern and when to implement the liquidation basis of accounting
IFRS does NOT offer guidance on the liquidation basis of accounting. GAAP DOES.
What basis of accounting does IFRS specify if the going concern of an entity is in substantial doubt?
IFRS does not specify
When an entity’s plans to mitigate the substantial doubt of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern are evaluated, what should NOT be factored in?
Whether the conditions that gave rise to the substantial doubt will continue. Only two factors are considered: whether the plan will be effectively implemented and whether it is probable the plan will be successful in mitigating
What two factors should be considered in evaluating an entity’s plan to mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about going concern?
Whether it will be
- Effectively implemented and
- Whether it will successfully mitigate the events or conditions
Under IFRS when is disclosure required when an entity’s going concern is in question?
When management is aware of MATERIAL UNCERTAINTIES that give rise to substantial doubt
Under GAAP when is disclosure required when an entity’s going concern is in question?
When there is substantial doubt, even if management has a plan to alleviate
Subsequent Event
Event that occurs after b/s date but b4 reporting date
Types of subsequent events
Recognizable (condition existed BEFORE b/s date like lawsuit)
Nonrecognizable (condition did not exist b4 b/s date)
Examples of recognized subsequent events
- Settlement of litigation
2. Loss on Uncollectable Receivable (for example, customer went bankrupt)
Do subsequent events effect quarterly reporting?
Yes
Nonrecognizable subsequent events are reported how?
Footnotes.
Nonrecognized subsequent events
Didn’t exist at b/s date and occurred after b/s date. The date is the key!