Explanations of attachment: learning theory Flashcards
Who came up with the learning theory of attachment?
Dollard and Miller
What is the basis of the learning theory of attachment?
- cupboard love approach as it suggest that babies learns to love whoever feeds them
What is classical conditioning?
- earning to associate two stimuli together so we begin to respond to one in the same way we already respond to the other
How does classical conditioning work in attachment?
1) Food (UCS) produces pleasure (UCR)
2) Caregiver (NS) produces no response
3) Food (UCS) + Caregiver (NS) =pleasure (UCR)
4) Caregiver (CS) produces pleasure (CR)
What is operant conditioning?
Involves learning through consequences of behaviour
How does positive reinforcement work in attachment?
- baby is positively reinforced when they cry as mother feeds, so crying behaviour is repeated
How does a caregiver respond when crying is directed for comfort?
- respond with comforting social suppressor behaviour
How does negative reinforcement work in attachment?
- the caregiver is negatively reinforced because the crying stops, escaping from unpleasant behaviour is reinforced
What is the drive reduction theory?
The idea that all motivation comes from the result of biological needs
- primary drive =hunger
What did Sears say about caregivers and the primary drive?
- As caregivers provide food the primary drive of hunger becomes generalised to them
What is the secondary drive?
Attachment learned by an association between caregiver and the satisfaction of the primary drive
What is a limitation of the learning theory of attachment?
- counter evidence from animal studies
- e.g. Lorenz’s geese imprinted on the first moving object they saw regardless of whether object was associated with food
- Harlow’s monkeys preferred contact comfort (cloth wired) in preference to a wire one which provided milk
- factors other than food important in formation
What is another limitation of the learning theory of attachment?
- counter evidence from studies of human babies
- Schaffer & Emerson found that babies tended to form their main attachment to mother regardless of feeding
- Isabella et al- high levels of synchrony predicted quality of attachment
- factors do not relate to food > not main factor
What is a strength of the learning theory pf attachment?
- elements of conditioning could be involved in attachment
- unlikely that food plays a central role but conditioning may still play a role
- e.g. baby may associate feeling warm and comfortable with the presence of a particular adult which influences baby’s choice of main attachment figure
learning theory=still useful
What is a counterpoint of the strength that conditioning may be involved?
- learning theory see babies as playing a passive role in attachment development, but research shows babies play a active role
- Fieldman & Eidelman, –Meltzoff and Moore & Isabella et al
- conditioning not an adequate explanation