Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation Flashcards
Did Bowlby’s material deprivation theory come before or after his theory of attachment?
before
What is maternal deprivation?
- The emotional and intellectual consequences of separation between a child and their mother/substitute
What is separation?
- Child is not in presence of PAF
- Brief separations, where child is left with substitute caregiver who can provide emotional care & is not significant for development
What is deprivation?
- loss of emotional care from a PAF or substitute caregiver
What is privation?
- Failure to form an attachment in the first place
What did Bowlby say the critical period was for psychological development?
- 2 and a half years
What happens if child is separated from their mother for an extended duration during the critical period?
- deprived of emotional care so psychological damage is inevitable
What two effects does extended deprivation have on a child?
- Effects their intellectual development and emotional development
What effects does extended deprivation have on child’s intellectual development?
- abnormally low IQ
Whose adoption study supports low IQ because of maternal deprivation and what did they find?
Goldfarb (1947) - found low IQ in children who had remained in institutions compared to those who were fostered
What effects does extended deprivation have on a child’s emotional development?
- affectionless psychopathy >inability to experience guilt or strong emotion for others
What did Bowlby’s 44 thieves study (1944) examine?
the link between maternal deprivation and affectionless psychopathy
Who were the two groups in Bowlby’s study?
- 44 teens referred for stealing
- compared to a control group of non criminal emotionally disturbed teen
What did Bowlby find about the thieves?
14/44 thieves - affectionless psychopaths
12/14 had experienced prolonged separation
What did Bowlby find about the control group?
2/44 experienced long separations
0/44 were affectionless psychopaths
What can be concluded from Bowlby’s thieves study?
- Prolonged early separation/deprivation causes affectionless psychopathy
What is a limitation of Bowlby’s maternal deprivation hypothesis to do with evidence?
- based on flawed evidence
- 44 thieves study is flawed because Bowlby carried out both family interviews & assessments for affectionless psychopathy
- open to bias as he knew what to expect/ had preconceived ideas which may have influence questions asked & his interpretations of answers
- Goldfarb -problems of CV’s> children in study had experienced early trauma and institutional care as well as prolonged separation from PAF
- evidence cannot be taken seriously
What is another limitation of Bowlby’s maternal deprivation to do with his distinction of early experiences?
- confusion between two types of early negative experience.
- Rutter draws a distinction between the two types of early negative experience
- Deprivation strictly refers to loss of PAF after attachment has developed
- Privation is failure to form attachment in the first place
- severe long term damage Bowlby associated with deprivation > more likely to be a result of privation (e.g. 44 thieves had disrupted early lives so may never have formed attachment)
- overestimated seriousness of the effects of deprivation on development
What is a further limitation of Bowlby’s maternal deprivation hypothesis?
- Bowlby idea of the critical period > damage inevitable if a child had not formed an attachment in first 2.5 years of their life
- However, Koluchova reported case of Czech twins who experienced severe emotional & psychological abuse from the age of 18 months up until they were 7
- experienced excellent quality aftercare and fully recovered by the time they were teens
- lasting harm is not inevitable even in cases of severe privation > CP better seen as SP
What research support is there for Bowlby’s maternal deprivation hypothesis?
- supported by Harlow’s (1958) research with monkeys
- showed that monkeys reared in isolation from their mother suffered emotional and social problems in older age
- monkey’s deprived of emotional care from mother and, as such, grew up to be aggressive and had problems interacting with other monkeys.
- increased validity