Animal studies of attachment Flashcards
What was Lorenz’s procedure (1952)?
- Classic experiment
- randomly divided large clutch of goose eggs
- Half hatched with mother goose in natural environment
- Other half hatched with Lorenz’s as first moving object they saw
What was Lorenz’s research findings?
- Incubator group followed Lorenz everywhere
- control group followed mother everywhere
- Even when mixed they followed first moving object they saw
What did Lorenz call what he saw and what was the critical period?
- what he found was called imprinting, whereby birds attach to and follow first moving object they see
- critical period for imprinting to occur was few hours or it may not happen at all
What did Lorenz also investigate and explain?
- Sexual imprinting > relationship between imprinting and adult mate preferences
- imprinting on a human would often lead to courtship behaviour towards human
What did Lorenz describe in a case study that supports sexual imprinting?
- A peacock being reared in the reptile house of a zoo, which imprinted on giant turtles and showed courtship behaviour towards them
What was Harlow’s research procedure (1958)?
- tested the idea that a soft object serves some functions of a mother
- Harlow removed 16 baby Rhesus monkey from their mothers and reared them with two surrogate mothers
- 1st condition: milk was dispensed by the plain wired mother
- 2nd condition: milk was dispensed by the cloth covered mother
What was Harlow’s research findings and conclusions?
- Monkeys preferred cloth covered mother& sought comfort from cloth mother when frightened
- concluded that contact comfort was more important to monkeys than food
What consequences did maternally deprived monkeys suffer as adults?
- Harlow followed monkeys into adulthood, to see effect of maternal deprivation and found monkey were:
- less sociable
- more aggressive
- unskilled at mating
- when they did mate some killed their young
What is the critical period for attachment formation for monkeys?
- mother figure introduced within 90 days or attachment is impossible and damage done is irreversible
What is a strength of Lorenz’s research?
- research support for the concept of imprinting
- Regolin and Vallortigara - exposed chicks to simple shape combinations that moved such as a triangle with a rectangle in front
- when exposed to a range of combinations they followed the original one most closely
- supports that young animals are born with innate mechanisms to imprint on a moving object present
What is a limitation of Lorenz’s research?
- can’t generalise findings from birds to humans
- Attachment formation is different & more complex e.g. mammalian attachment is a two-way process as it’s not just the young that become attached but also mothers
- results and conclusions can’t necessarily be extrapolated to human population
What is a strength of Harlow’s research?
- real world application
- Howe > Harlow’s research has helped social workers & clinical psychologists understand that a lack of bond attachment may be a risk factor in child development
- Allows them to intervene to prevent poor outcomes
- also understand importance of attachment figures for baby monkeys in zoos & breeding programmes
- practical value
What is a limitation of Harlow’s research?
- can’t generalise findings & conclusions from monkeys to humans
- although mammals share some common attachment behaviours, human brain and human behaviour is much more complex than monkeys
- many not be appropriate to generalise these findings
Why may Harlow’s research be considered unethical?
Primates considers human like> stands to reason effects of psychological harm endured similar to human babies