Explain Seligman’s concept of ‘positive explanatory style’. Taking the domains of professional sport and student examination performance, briefly outline your views on the strengths and limitations of the concept. Flashcards
1
Q
1st paragraph
A
- “Success requires persistence, the ability to not give up in the face of failure… Optimistic explanatory style is the key to persistence” - Seligman (1990)
- Definition of optimism and pessimism
- Interesting as may be key to success
- Curing negatives doesn’t produce positives
- Development of positive psychology
2
Q
2nd paragraph
A
- Seligman (1967) theory of learned helplessness, dogs inescapable shock, escapable shock no shock
- Can be extrapolated to humans Seligman (1972)
- Hiroto (1971) - humans noise learned helplessness
- Helpless person more likely to be pessimistic
- Differences between optimist and pessimist - permanence, pervasiveness and personalisation
3
Q
3rd paragraph
A
- Permanence - bad events temporary, pessimists take longer to recover
- Pessimists see positive events as short-lived, optimists believe good things happen for permanent reasons
4
Q
4th paragraph
A
- Pervasiveness - optimists tend to compartmentalise their helplessness, only feeling helpless about one area of life
- Pessimists extrapolate their failures to all areas of life
5
Q
5th paragraph
A
- Personalisation - optimists dont blame bad events on internal factors, internalise positive events
- Pessimists blame themselves for negative events and externalise positive events
6
Q
6th paragraph
A
- Ellis (1957) ABC model CBT to change thoughts
- Adversity
- Belief
- Consequence
- Seligman (1991) added D and E
- D disputation
- E energisation
7
Q
7th paragraph
A
- Professional sport
- Gordon (2006) football pitch strong correlation between ASQ optimism and performance
- Optimistic soccer players demonstrated better performance during a loss than pessimists
- Rettew & Reivich (1995) positive explanatory style experienced more wins in basketball and baseball
8
Q
8th paragraph
A
- Academic performance
- PES yields positive outcomes
- Peterson & Barrett (1987) students explained poor performance with internal causes received lower grades during their first year than students who used external causes
- NES less likely to have specific academic goals and made use of less academic advising
9
Q
9th paragraph
A
- Norem & Cantor (1989) defined defensive pessimism as a coping strategy
- Defensive pessimism prepares for anxiety-provoking events or performances
- Overly anxious about negative result despite good track record
- Defensive pessimism causes harder working
- DPs performed just as well as academic optimists
- Only in short term
10
Q
10th paragraph
A
- Optimistic illusions of performance aren’t linked with good mental health and rather narcissism (Robins & John, 1997)
- Weinstein, Lyons, Sandman and Cuite (1998) people optimistic about and underestimated radon in homes less likely to engage in risk prevention
- Extrapolated to domains of academic performance and sport - complacency
11
Q
11th paragraph
A
- Clear OES is important, not exclusively
- OES can increase performance, not without limitations
- Optimism alone cannot be held responsible for success
- Best outcomes combination of expertise, effort and explanatory style
- Mere optimism cannot make up for a lack of skill/knowledge, can enhance these