experimental research Flashcards

1
Q

treatment group

A

he group that gets the “treatment,” or the altered independent
variable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

control group

A

The group that does not receive the “treatment.” We can see this
group as the baseline

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

treatment vs control

A

Experiments involve manipulating one or more independent variables across
treatment and control groups.
Then, both groups are assessed to see if there are any differences between them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

lab experiments

A

conducted in an artificial setting, with controlled manipulations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

field experiments

A

Field experiments are conducted in a real-world setting with controlled
manipulations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

conjoint experiments

A

Conjoint experiments are survey-based techniques that help determine the attributes
people value in an object or action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

vignette experiments

A

Vignette experiments provide participants with different examples of situations and
ask for participants’ reactions and responses to these situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

quasi-experiments

A

research studies that investigate the effect of an intervention or treatment
Quasi-experimental designs approximate a true experimental design but lack random assignment to experimental and control groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

natural experiments

A

Natural experiments are where the treatment and control groups are naturally
occurring.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

when does a natural experiment occur

A

This happens where the treatment and control group differ substantially without any
intervention or manipulation by the researcher

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

example of a natural experiment

A

For example, in examining the effect
of access to public transportation (IV) on class attendance (DV), a researcher may
look at a set of students from a rural community, versus a set of students from a more
urban community. They may observe that access to public transport (our independent
variable) varies across the two groups. Individuals from an urban community may
have better access to public transportation naturally, just based on where they live—
without any need for the researcher to manipulate the independent variable
themselves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

internal validity

A

Refers to how well a study shows whether changes in the
independent variable causes changes in the dependent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

external validity

A

Refers to a study’s ability to generalize results from its site or
sample to its target population or beyond.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

confounder

A

A confounding variable is a variable other than the independent
variable that is causing a change in the dependent variable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

spurious relationships

A

A situation in which a relationship between two variables
seems to exist but, in reality, they are correlated because of a third variable, a
confounder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

how do confounding variables influence a study’s internal validity

A

threaten a study’s internal validity by creating alternative explanations for results, making it difficult to determine if observed relationships are truly causal

17
Q

what is the point of having treatment and control groups

A

to see if a difference is the result of this specific change in variable, or just by chance

18
Q

critiques of experimental research

A

potential for artificiality, ethical concerns, and limitations in generalizability, especially when dealing with complex real-world phenomena

19
Q

purpose of random assignment in experimental research

A

to ensure that groups being compared are equivalent at the start of the study, minimizing bias and allowing researchers to confidently attribute any observed differences in outcomes to the manipulated variable

20
Q

deductive approach

A

starts with a general theory or hypothesis and then tests it through specific observations or experiments, moving from the general to the specific
experiments are deductive

21
Q

inductive approach

A

starts with specific observations or data and moves towards broader generalizations or theories