Exercise dependence (Week 6) Flashcards
what did (Hausenblas et al., 2017) say to whether we can get addicted to exercise
(Hausenblas et al., 2017) stated that, according to the DSM-V criteria, you cannot become addicted to exercise
state 2 general facts about exercise dependancy
1) has a high comorbidity with eating disorders, anxiety, and depressive disorders
2) has a high comorbidity with disorders, such as anxiety, that do meet DSM-V criteria
how was exercise dependancy first stumbled upon (3 points) ?
- (Baekeland., 1970) sought to do a study looking at the effect of exercise deprivation on habitual runners
- he found that habitual runners were refusing to participate, despite financial incentives
- ended up having to do his study on moderately active runners, so the study probably didn’t get as much of an insight into exercise dependence as it would if ED individuals had taken part
what did (Baekeland., 1970) discover about the effects of exercise deprivation ?
anxiety, sleep loss, appetite loss, and reduced libido
state what it is meant by the key term - ‘exercise dependance’
‘exercise dependance is a multi-directional and maladaptive pattern of physical activity that leads to significant impairment or distress’
(Hausenblas & Symons-Downs., 2002)
state 3 additional facts identified by (Hausenblas & Symons-Downs., 2002) of exercise dependancy ?
- other terms include: compulsive exerciser, exercise addiction, obligatory exercisers
- ED has both psychological and behavioural elements
- a maladaptive attribute –> too much exercise can lead to the break down of body tissue and other health issues such as chronic fatigue
state 3 diagnostic criteria of exercise dependance identified by (Hausenblas & Symons-Downs., 2002)
1) increased tolerance to physical activity
2) intention effects (over exercising)
3) time effects (over investment)
4) inability to control thoughts about exercise
5) a reduction in social and vocational activities
6) exercise withdrawal effects
7) continuing to exercise despite injury/illness
state 3 warning signs of exercise dependance identified by (Hausenblas & Symons-Downs., 2002)
1) significant weight loss
2) marked increase in exercise behaviours
3) withdrawal from other activities
4) preoccupation with exercise and diet
5) calorie counting
6) exercising more having eaten more
7) struggling to sit still and relax
state 3 health risks of exercise dependance as identified by (Hausenblas & Symons-Downs., 2002)
1) muscle and joint damage
2) muscle retardation
3) pressure sores and stress fractures
4) amenorrhea (absence of menstruation)
5) dehydration and/or exhaustion
6) strokes (in older adults)
7) immunodeficiency
state 3 facts referring to the prevalence of exercise dependancy as identified by (Hausenblas & Symons-Downs., 2002)
3 - 13% of college population (n = 2400) were at risk of exercise dependance
40% of this college population were considered symptomatic for exercise dependance
the rate of exercise dependance in the general population is thought to be much lower (approx. 3%)
what was the purpose of the systematic review done by (Hausenblas & Symons-Downs., 2002) ?
the purpose was to review all the literature examining exercise dependance and exercise deprivation
what were the methods to the systematic review done by (Hausenblas & Symons-Downs., 2002) ?
- comprehensive literature search selected 77 exercise dependance and 11 exercise deprivation studies spanning 29 years (1970 - 1999)
- the exercise deprivation studies reviewed were only experimental studies
state, and possibly explain, 4 considerations identified by (Hausenblas & Symons-Downs., 2002) about exercise dependance literature
1) majority of studies failed to have control groups (N = 42)
2) many studies were correlational in design
- limiting in nature, cannot be used to establish a relationship between more than 2 variables
3) discrepant criteria for exercise dependence
4) few experimental designs in the field
- important to ensure the study is precise, generates power, and an appropriate sample size is present to answer the research question
state 2 findings identified by (Hausenblas & Symons-Downs., 2002) about the effects of exercise cessation
the cessation of regular exercise results in negative psychological states (Hausenblas & Symons-Downs., 2002)
exercise deprivation sensations (symptoms) can be experienced by both dependent and non-dependent exercisers (Szabo., 1999)
state 5 considerations of exercise deprivation research identified by (Hausenblas & Symons-Downs., 2002)
1) studies showing different lengths of deprivation cause these effects
2) different studies examine different exercise regiments
3) self-reported PA measures used frequently without the use of hard-outcome measures
4) use of diverse methodologies
5) probably only examined non-dependent exercisers due to the lack of likelihood that dependent exercisers would sign up and withdraw themselves from exercise
what was the first self-reported measure used to analyse exercise dependence ?
the ‘unidimensional commitment to running scale’ (Carmack & Martens., 1979)
why was the ‘unidimensional commitment to running scale’ heavily criticised ? (3 points)
1) commitment and dependence represent different entities (Szabo et al., 1997)
2) although designed to assess positive addiction, several items can be constructed as negative components of addiction (e.g. - inc^ sense of discomfort when a run is missed) (Hausenblas & Symons-Downs., 2002)
3) runners self-perception of addiction were predictive of the scores. However, the term addiction was operationalised, rendering the significance of this relationship questionable ((Pierce., 1994)
what was a more recent measure of exercise dependance throughout the literature reviewed by (Hausenblas & Symons-Downs., 2002)
the ‘obligatory exercise questionnaire’ (Pasman & Thompson., 1998)
state 2 advantages of using the ‘obligatory exercise questionnaire’ to assess exercise dependance (Pasman & Thompson., 1998)
1) assesses psychological aspects of obligatory exercisers
2) has well established psychometric properties (Coen & Dyles., 1993)
what is a drawback of the use of the ‘obligatory exercise questionnaire’ ?
scale items developed from a highly criticised study done by (Yates et al., 1983) which had no pertinent data, poor methodology, and no relevance to the majority of runners (paper focus)
what was one of the better scales used to measure exercise dependance identified by (Hausenblas & Symons-Downs., 2002) in their review paper
‘commitment to exercise scale’ (Davis et al)
what was the ‘commitment to exercise scale’ (Davis et al) ?
- a multi-dimensional assessment of exercise dependance which had 2 scales measuring:
1) ‘obligatory’ (e.g. - guilt from missed exercise sessions)
2) ‘pathological’ (e.g. - continuing to exercise through injury/illness)
(Hausenblas & Symons-Downs., 2002) gave 5 reasons to why the diversity of methodology used to assess exercise dependance was difficult. what are those 5 reasons ?
1) insufficient evidence that ‘dependent exercisers’ has been selected in studies
2) questionnaires fail to distinguish between dependant, symptomatic, and asymptomatic individuals so is possible people of different commitments were analysed by accident
3) many researchers used non-operationalised, single item questions of self-perceived dependance as evidence of concurrent or discrepant validity
4) a conceptual basis for the questionnaires was failed to be established
5) the data driven development approach of the scales resulted in the danger of borrowing the problems of previous studies due to relying on past instruments as a major item scorer
(Hausenblas & Symons-Downs., 2002) stated that future research on exercise dependance should be based on what 5 measures ?
- based on theoretical models
- homogeneity of definitions
- use objective measures of behaviour accompanied with self-reported measures
- require longitudinal, ecological, and experimental studies to enhance understanding of the construct
- sufficient control groups are required to infer causal effects
what was the purpose of the following study:
‘striving for success or addiction? exercise dependance amongst elite Australian athletes (McNamara & McCabe., 2012)
to understand our theoretical understanding of exercise dependancy and to determine the use of the ‘biopsychosocial model’ to explain the development and maintenance of exercise dependancy amongst elite Australian athletes
what is the ‘Biopsychosocial Model of exercise dependance’ ?
- provides a framework to examine the predisposing, precipitating, and perpetuating factors of exercise dependance among elite athletes
- suggests that biological factors have development and maintenance over the condition
- has a direct relationship with social and behavioural factors
- both interact to influence the development and maintenance of exercise dependance
what were the participants from the following study:
‘striving for success or addiction? exercise dependancy amongst elite Australian athletes (McNamara & McCabe., 2012)
(n = 234) elite male and female athletes, aged 18-50, ranging across 25 sports