Exercise and Cognition (Week 5) Flashcards
use 3 points to explain what it is meant by the key term - ‘cognitive psychology’
1) the study of internal mental processes that govern complex behaviour
2) how knowledge is chosen, acquired, stored and used (computer analogy)
3) how do these processes develop and impact our thoughts, feelings, and beliefs
explain what it is meant by the key term - ‘basic cognitive functioning’ (3 points)
(Biddle & Mutrie., 2015)
- basic cognitive functioning helps us control and manage our behaviours
- attention, cognitive flexibility and inhibition , inhibitory control, reaction time, working memory
- work-together to goal-oriented and more complex functions
what it is meant by: 1) cognitive flexibility; 2) cognitive inhibition; and 3) inhibitory control
1) cognitive flexibility - the ability to focus on a range of stimuli (multi-tasking)
2) cognitive inhibition - the ability to block out irrelevant stimuli
3) inhibitory control - instincts
(develop after adolescents as emotions take over during that stage of development –> develop at a much faster rate)
explain what it is meant by the key term - ‘executive cognitive functioning’ (3 points)
(Biddle & Mutrie., 2015)
- higher order executive processes that rely on basic cognitive processes
- fluid and crystallised intelligence, planning, meta-cognition
- help us to perform complex and social tasks, manage time, analyse sensory information, regulate emotions
explain the difference between fluid and crystallised intelligence
fluid = reasoning, problem solving
crystallised = knowledge
what is meta-cognition ?
our own insight into what our cognitive strengths and weaknesses are
make 2 points to why cognition is so important
1) enables successful functioning in life, educational, vocational, and social domains
2) decline in executive and basic functioning with older age, dementia and Alzheimer’s
state 3 factors that can potentially have an adverse affect our cognition
1) neglect
2) trauma
3) injury
4) addiction
5) ADHD
6) autism
7) poor diet
8) poor physical health
state 2 considerations of the following review paper:
‘PA and cognitive functioning in youth’ (Tomporowski et al., 2015)
- heterogeneity in types of exercise prescribed between the studies - what’s best ?
- papers applying a meta-analysis approach found only small links that exercise improves cognition in the youth
what was the purpose of the following review article?
‘PA and cognitive functioning in youth’ (Tomporowski et al., 2015)
to analyse papers giving both quantitative and qualitative focuses on the link between exercise and cognition
explain the methods to the following review paper:
‘PA and cognitive functioning in youth’ (Tomporowski et al., 2015)
- studies characterised into quantitative and qualitative groups
1) quantitative - measured in cardio-respiratory function
2) qualitative - measured with observed and self-reported measures
- studies restricted to healthy, pre-adolescent children
what were the main 4 ‘quantitive’ results to the following review paper:
‘PA and cognitive functioning in youth’ (Tomporowski et al., 2015)
- studies found that 20-30 minutes a day below VT to improve mood states and/or cog performance in lab and field based studies
- improvements in cardio-respiratory system shown to aid O2 delivery to the brain
- acute exercise increases children’s attention and processing speed
- chronic exercise improves children’s executive function
what was the difference between quantitative and qualitative studies in the following review paper:
‘PA and cognitive functioning in youth’ (Tomporowski et al., 2015)
quantitative:
- minimal skill, repeated movements
- e.g. cycling
qualitative:
- high cognitive efforts, skill learning
- e.g. martial arts
what were the main ‘qualitative’ results to the following review paper:
‘PA and cognitive functioning in youth’ (Tomporowski et al., 2015)
1) chronic improvements in memory (solo and group exercise)
2) greater and more precise recall from chronic exercise
3) shown to improve areas of meta-cognition (e.g. - technical creativity skills)
- more studies needed due to small number of un-replicated evidence on this point
what recommendations did the following review paper make for future research on ‘exercise and cognition in youths’:
‘PA and cognitive functioning in youth’ (Tomporowski et al., 2015)
- have homogeneity of cognitive definitions
- development of a suitable model
- generalisability to settings outside of sport
- are the chronic efforts enduring (i.e. - if you stop exercise vs if you carry on)
- further research on meta-cognition and exercise !!!
state 3 points about exercise and its effect on cognition in the youth by (Tomporowski., 2003; Tomporowski et al., 2015)
1) facilitates decision making, response time and accuracy, inhibitory control, and working memory
2) effects are more noticeable for complex motor activities
3) exercise to dehydration compromises acute information processing and memory
explain findings from (Raspberry et al., 2011) on chronic exercise and cognition in the youth
1) exercise studies improved intelligence, cognition, and academic outcomes (Raspberry et al., 2011)
2) small groups, aerobic activity, and 3 times a week most effective (Raspberry et al., 2011)
3) research designs were weak, inconsistent and open to bias
why did (Raspberry et al., 2011) state that small groups were best for cognition effects
shy children in large groups can easily hard and pretend to be doing the work so miss out on cognitive benefits. by being in a small group, they’d get found out so have to do the activity now
explain the study design to the following study:
cognitive benefits of exercise in overweight/obese youths (Davis, Tomporowski et al., 2011)
- 170 overweight children aged 7-11 years
- assigned to 1/3 groups
1) wait list
2) 20 min activity, 20 minute ‘play time’
3) 20 minute activity, rest, 20 minutes more activity
- looked at the different effects this had on cognitive performance longitudinally over 13 weeks across the 3 groups
what was the main finding to the following study:
cognitive benefits of exercise in overweight/obese youths (Davis, Tomporowski et al., 2011)
1) brilliant evidence that exercise benefits executive function and math ability in the youth population
- however, this study showed no benefit in reading ability
explain the study design to the following study:
exercise for youths with neurological conditions –> ADHD (Neudecker et al., 2019)
a review article of 13 exercise and ADHD research papers
what were the 2 main findings to the following study:
exercise for youths with neurological conditions –> ADHD (Neudecker et al., 2019)
1) acute and chronic exercise aids cognitive function, reduces emotional/behavioural problems
2) found that physically taxing, non-competitive and repeated movements were most effective for those suffering from ADHD (had a soothing effect)