Exam 4: Lecture 9 Flashcards
Luciferase Assay
-can determine presence and degree of activation potential of DNA binding protein
Example to determine activation strength of So-Eya complex
- conducted in eukaryotic cell line
- using Drosophila Kc167 cells
- cells simultaneously transformed with number of plasmids all containing components necessary
- mt-GAL4 used to induce expression of genes of interest
- mt enhancer activated by presence of copper sulfate
- UAS-So and UAS-Eya constructs activated in response to presence of GAL4
- enhancer/promoter-luciferase transcriptional reporter contains binding sites for So-Eya complex
- binding of So-Eya to enhancer element leads to transcription of luciferase gene which can then be measured
- UAS-Renilla is also activated in response to GAL4
- used to control for transfection efficiency which can vary from experiment to experiment
- level of Luciferase activity is divided by the amount of Renilla activity
- gives normalized ratio for comparison across samples
Determining if So-Eya complex functions as transcriptional activator
-control experiments must accompany actual experiment to determine relevance
First Control (UAS-GFP)
- GFP not transcription factor and cannot bind to enhancer
- this control provides level of baseline expression that is derived from minimal core promoter
Second Control (UAS-So)
- Ratio of luciferase/renilla is higher than that of GFP control
- provides baseline activity of So
- activity can be intrinsic to So protein itself or due to interactions with proteins that are found in Kc167 cells
Third Control (UAS-Eya)
- luciferase/renilla ratio higher than GFP control and UAS-So
- represents amount of endogenous So expressed in Kc167 cell and can bind to Eya
Experimental Condition (UAS-S0 & UAS-Eya)
- luciferase/renilla ratio much higher than any of controls
- real experimental value of So-Eya transcriptional activation
Measuring Transcriptional Activation Potential
- from luciferase assay clear that So-Eya is strong activator
- expression of So on its own is sufficient to activate transcription too (slightly lower levels)
- begs question can So itself activate transcription
Transcriptional Reporter Assay addressing question if So can activate transcription
- UAS-lacZ reporter construct transformed simultaneously into yeast cells with plasmid that contains Sine Oculis fused to DNA binding of GAL4
- chimeric protein will bind to UAS sites
- if So contains activation domain then it will be able to direct RNA Pol II transcription of lacZ reporter
- as you can see full-length So is capable of activating LacZ expression
- optix protein is used as negative control since it is unable to activate transcription
Determining location of activation domain in assy
- individual portions of So protein removed
- modified proteins then run through same assay
- activation domain identified when loss of individual domain leads to loss of lacZ expression and activity
- case of So two activation domains one in SIX protein-protein interaction motif and one in non-descript carboxy portion of protein
Histidine
- yeast cells either take up histidine from surrounding material or they can synthesize it in vivo
- remove histidine from media cells can synthesize in vivo
- remove histidine from media and delete one enzyme that catalyzes it (HIS3) cell dies
- yeast HIS3 gene encodes imidazoleglycerol-phosphate dehydratase which catalyzes last step in histidine biosynthesis pathway
- converts imidazoleglycerol phosphate into histidine
Histidine assay
- use biosynthesis of histidine to measure strength of transcriptional activator
- HIS3 gene mutated and cells placed in media that lacks histidine
- normally die
- UAS-HIS3 construct inserted into yeast genome
- construct expressed, cells able to synthesize histidine and will grow
- cells also transformed with plasmid that contains So fused to GAL4 DNA binding domain
- know So can activate transcription, want to determine strenght
Determining Strength of Activation
- to determine add inhibitor of histidine biosynthesis to media
- if transcriptional activator is weak, low levels of HIS3 activation will not be enough to overcome high concentrations of inhibitor
- if strong activator it will activate transcription of HIS3 at high enough levels so high concentrations of inhibitor are overcome
- helps understand relative strength of TF’s