EXAM 2 Performance Management Flashcards
Performance management
Continuous process of identifying, measuring, evaluating, communicating, developing, & rewarding performance by linking individual performance to org’s mission and goals
Benefits of performance management
Higher performance, insights, forces communication, avoids lawsuits
Performance appraisal
Measuring & evaluating
Performance management process
Prereqs (missions, job analysis, support) -> performance planning -> performance execution -> performance assessment -> performance review
Performance Planning
Plan what the employee will be working on
Performance Execution
Supervisor evaluating + giving feedback
Performance Assessment
Manager + employee individually rate employee
Performance Review
Get together + discuss, evaluate, past performance + future
Purposes of performance management
- Administrative
- Developmental
Should do both, most do administrative
Administrative
Evaluation (good or bad)
Decision making (personnel decisions)
Recognizes past performance
Numerical (based on #s)
Developmental
Motivation (to improve, identify strengths + weakness)
Engagement
Narrative (descriptive)
360 degree feedback
All sources (supervisor, coworker, self, subordinate, customer)
Supervisor evaluation
MOST RELIABLE
- Bias
- Don’t see on regular basis
- Sees outcomes
Coworkers evaluation
2ND MOST POSITIVELY BIASED
Developmental
- Lots of bias (usually pos.)
- Neg. bias when admin
- See day-to-day
- See comm. skills
- No training on how to give feedback
Self evaluation
MOST POSITIVELY BIASED
Developmental
- Encourages self-reflection
Subordinate (lower in rank)
- Best position to evaluate managing skills
- Bias -> retribution
- Don’t always see everything
Customer evaluation
NEGATIVELY BIASED
- Rarely see you
- Good to evaluate customer service skills
- More likely to give feedback when seeing bad
- Low response rate
Rating errors
Distributional
- Leniency
- Severity
- Central tendency
Halo/Horn
Similarity
Recency
Contrast
Distributional rating error
Only use part of rating scale
Leniency
Only use top part of scale (higher than deserved)
People with high agreeableness
Severity
Only use bottom part of scale (hard ratings)
People with high conscientiousness
Central tendency
Only use middle part of scale (everyone is avg.)
Halo/Horn
Because of only ONE thing, assume the rest bad or good
Similarity
More similar = better rated
Recency
Focus on most recent action, not the entire picture
Contrast
Comparing to people instead of standard
To avoid rating errors
- Multiple reviews
- Spread them out
- Train evaluators
- Standards
- Evaluate evaluators
- Documentation
Methods of rating performance
Narrative/Qualitative (Written description)
Results oriented (Focus on outcomes, what was achieved, don’t care how achieved, objective)
Behavior oriented (Focus on methods to get results, subjective)
Narrative/Qualitative
Developmental
Essay (no feedback, no examples, dependent on person writing, can’t really compare)
Critical Incidents (writing down throughout, time consuming, only extreme examples written)
Results oriented: Management by Objectives (MBO)
Administrative, most common, objective
Joint goal setting, realistic, specific measurable, time-bound
Which evaluator has the most bias?
Self
Behavior Oriented methods
Relative (compare to coworkers)
Absolute (compare to pre-determined standard)
Relative
Alternation ranking (admin, best to worst, start @ edges)
Paired comparison (one @ a time)
Forced distribution (certain # per category)
Absolute
Behavior checklists (list all behaviors, check ones done, BINARY)
Graphic rating scale (MOST COMMON, continuum, recognize diff. levels)
BARS (combo of graphic rating scale & critical incident, includes definition)
Giving feedback
- Reduces uncertainty
- Higher perf.
- Rewarding + motivating
- Shows you care
Why managers don’t give feedback
- Afraid of reaction
- No training
- Don’t see all
- Too busy
Characteristics of good feedback
- Both pos. & neg.
- Objective (evidence)
- What next?
- Timely manner
- Cover everyone
- Tailer to individual
- Be ready for reaction
- Focus on behavior NOT individual
- Look for patterns (not on time)
- Discuss impact
Creating legal PM systems
- Use job analysis
- Standardize
- Rate on multiple dimensions
- Document perf.
- Review w/ employees
- Train & hold raters accountable
- Use multiple raters