Exam 2: leftover lectures Flashcards
Paul Taylor’s theory requires that we _______________All living things are striving to ________________of their kind. This is precisely why it makes sense (even in the case of plants) to say they can be ______________. According to Taylor, we must therefore give moral consideration to anything that has _____.
Paul Taylor’s theory requires that we respect the good of all living things. All living things are striving to flourish in accordance with the life-cycle of their kind. This is precisely why it makes sense (even in the case of plants) to say they can be harmed or benefitted. According to Taylor, we must therefore give moral consideration to anything that has life.
Taylor’s Moral Argument:
P1. _________________________
P2. But every single living thing has a good of its own.
C3. So, we Ought to show respect to every living thing in Our actions and attitudes.
Taylor’s Moral Argument:
P1. For any being that has a good of its own, we ought to show respect to that being in
Our actions and attitudes.
P2. But every single living thing has a good of its own.
C3. So, we Ought to show respect to every living thing in Our actions and attitudes.
Taylor’s Moral Argument:
P1. For any being that has a good of its own, we ought to show respect to that being in Our actions and attitudes.
P2. ______________________
C3. So, we Ought to show respect to every living thing in Our actions and attitudes.
Taylor’s Moral Argument:
P1. For any being that has a good of its own, we ought to show respect to that being in Our actions and attitudes.
P2. But every single living thing has a good of its own.
C3. So, we Ought to show respect to every living thing in Our actions and attitudes.
Taylor’s Moral Argument:
P1. For any being that has a good of its own, we ought to show respect to that being in Our actions and attitudes.
P2. But every single living thing has a good of its own.
C3. _________________
Taylor’s Moral Argument:
P1. For any being that has a good of its own, we ought to show respect to that being in Our actions and attitudes.
P2. But every single living thing has a good of its own.
C3. So, we Ought to show respect to every living thing in Our actions and attitudes.
Taylor’s Moral Argument:
Taylor’s Moral Argument:
P1. For any being that has a good of its own, we ought to show respect to that being in Our actions and attitudes.
P2. But every single living thing has a good of its own.
C3. So, we Ought to show respect to every living thing in Our actions and attitudes.
Many suggest that extending moral consideration to plants is extending moral consideration______. One such critic is _____
Many suggest that extending moral consideration to plants is extending moral consideration too far. One such critic is R.M. Hare
Hare’s Rebuttal to Taylor.
P1. __________________________
P2. And things that have no conscious desires cannot want to be treated in any way.
C3. Therefore, living things that have no conscious desires are not morally relevant.
Hare’s Rebuttal to Taylor.
P1. But the entire basis of morality is the golden rule, to do unto others as we would want them to do to us.
P2. And things that have no conscious desires cannot want to be treated in any way.
C3. Therefore, living things that have no conscious desires are not morally relevant.
Hare’s Rebuttal to Taylor.
P1. But the entire basis of morality is the golden rule, to do unto others as we would want them to do to us.
P2______________________________
C3. Therefore, living things that have no conscious desires are not morally relevant.
Hare’s Rebuttal to Taylor.
P1. But the entire basis of morality is the golden rule, to do unto others as we would want them to do to us.
P2. And things that have no conscious desires cannot want to be treated in any way.
C3. Therefore, living things that have no conscious desires are not morally relevant.
Hare’s Rebuttal to Taylor.
P1. But the entire basis of morality is the golden rule, to do unto others as we would want them to do to us.
P2. And things that have no conscious desires cannot want to be treated in any way.
C3. Therefore, ______________________
Hare’s Rebuttal to Taylor.
P1. But the entire basis of morality is the golden rule, to do unto others as we would want them to do to us.
P2. And things that have no conscious desires cannot want to be treated in any way.
C3. Therefore, living things that have no conscious desires are not morally relevant.
According to Taylor, however, Hare’s argument begs the question- assuming at the Outset (P1) that _____________________________. The golden rule is about how we treat other people. We Can’t just assume that Our moral obligations__________.
According to Taylor, however, Hare’s argument begs the question- assuming at the Outset (P1) that moral consideration only extends to things that have conscious desires. The golden rule is about how we treat other people. We Can’t just assume that Our moral obligations end there.
Sumner provides a stronger case against Taylors view. He makes an important distinction between______________________
Sumner provides a stronger case against Taylors view. He makes an important distinction between two relevant senses of Taylor’s phrase “good of its Own.”
Sumner’s Rebuttal to Tavlor:
P1.__________________________________
P2. Yet promoting and respecting the good of every living thing involves making them
a good of their kind.
C3. So, we do not have moral reason to promote and respect the good of every living
thing.
Sumner’s Rebuttal to Tavlor:
P1. We have no moral reason to make sure that all things are a good of their kind (that would be unrealistic and unreasonable).
P2. Yet promoting and respecting the good of every living thing involves making them
a good of their kind.
C3. So, we do not have moral reason to promote and respect the good of every living
thing.
Sumner’s Rebuttal to Tavlor:
P1. We have no moral reason to make sure that all things are a good of their kind (that would be unrealistic and unreasonable).
P2. _________________________
C3. So, we do not have moral reason to promote and respect the good of every living thing.
Sumner’s Rebuttal to Tavlor:
P1. We have no moral reason to make sure that all things are a good of their kind (that would be unrealistic and unreasonable).
P2. Yet promoting and respecting the good of every living thing involves making them a good of their kind.
C3. So, we do not have moral reason to promote and respect the good of every living thing.
Sumner’s Rebuttal to Tavlor:
P1. We have no moral reason to make sure that all things are a good of their kind (that would be unrealistic and unreasonable).
P2. Yet promoting and respecting the good of every living thing involves making them a good of their kind.
C3. So, ________________________________
Sumner’s Rebuttal to Tavlor:
P1. We have no moral reason to make sure that all things are a good of their kind (that would be unrealistic and unreasonable).
P2. Yet promoting and respecting the good of every living thing involves making them a good of their kind.
C3. So, we do not have moral reason to promote and respect the good of every living thing.