Exam 1 Flashcards
psych. is the study of
mind, brain and beh
mind v brain
mind- thoughts, not concrete brain-physical
dualism
Descartes
science is only study of body
non-animals do not have a mind
widely accepted by all
empiricists
locke
berkley
hume
supp. dualism but had no research
british associationists
hartley, mill and stuart mill believed that science = mind dev. hypoth. memory. learning and percep. no research
psychophysics
weber and fechner 1887
first to practice psych.
but not invented yet
did empir. research
independant variable (IV)
thing getting controlled or manipulated
dependant variable (DV)
thing reacting to change in IV
fact
objective statement
theory
not a law!
idea or model designed to explain existing facts or make predictions
(an explanatory hypothesis)
hypothesis-
prediction based on a theory
not working to prove but gain more or less confidence
generalizing hypo.
applying one instance to many
explanatory hypo.
cause and affect
confounding variable
one that ruins experiment
not accounted for or controlled
ex. amount of time studying
extraneous variable
factor that varies and is not a IV or DV
does not ruin experiment
ex. ethnicity of people
descriptive study
describ. w/out looking at relationship btw vari.
Ex. beds avaliable in MT for mental health
correlation v causation
not equal
ex. corn and abuse
correlational study
can help make predictions
no manipulation, just observes 2 vari.
Ex. lung cancer and cigar.
observational methods
tests
con- can be imposs. bc of practical and ethical reasons
ex. ppl don’t want to be caught smoking meth
naturalistic observation
ex. how ppl stop at stop signs
self-report methods
con- people can lie
done w/ interview or questionaire
lab study
pro- can control extraneous var.
con- ppl behave unnaturally
field study
pro- ppl act naturally
con- variables cannot be controlled
standard deviation
small SD- tight group
ex. jockeys
large SD- spread out
ex. high school students
correlational coefficient
-1.00 to 1.00
- and + indicates direction
distance from zero = strength
+ correlation
as one var. inc. so does the other
- correlation
as one var. inc. the other dec.
correlation not equal causation
ex. chocolate and nobel prizes
infernetial stats
reviews sample and population affect equivalence
will sample accura. represent pop?
statist. signif.
confident that sample = pop.
“less than 5% data would come out same if hypoth. is wrong”
*not same though!!!
statist. signif. value
less than or equal to 0.05
if greater than or equal to… not stat. sig.
spurious
predic. and outcome var. explained by common-causal var.
ex. viewing tv = spurious
w/out no relationship btw parenting style and agression
statist. signficant factors
difference btw means #ppl tested (size of sample) mre ppl studied= mre significant variability
error
impossible to avoid
not big deal
random variab. in data