Exam 1 Flashcards

Evaluation Chapters 1-3

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Program evaluation

A

Application of social research methods to systematically investigate the effectiveness of social intervention programs in ways that are adapted to their political and organizational environments and are designed to inform social action to improve social conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Main tasks of program evaluation

A

Assess the effectiveness of social programs

Identify the factors that drive or undermine their effectiveness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Confirmation bias

A

The tendency to see things in ways that favor preexisting beliefs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Relativity of program effects

A

With rare exceptions, some program participants will show improvement on the outcomes the program targets, depending on the focus of the program. But that does not necessarily mean these gains were caused by participation in the program. Improvement for at least some individuals is quite likely to have occurred anyway in the natural course of events even without the help of the program

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The two arms of evaluation

A

Description of program performance

Standards or criteria for judgement of program performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Five domains of Evaluation

A

Need for the program

Program theory and design

Program process

Program impact

Program efficiency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Needs Assessment

A

First step in planning a new program

Used to systematically describe and diagnose social needs

Needs assessment may also be appropriate to examine whether an established program is responsive to the current needs of its target population and provide guidance for improvement.

Also looks at the extent of an issue.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Assessment of Program Theory and Design

A

Must reflect valid assumptions about the nature of the problem

Must represent a feasible approach

Often in the form of a logic model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Assessment of Program Process

A

Assessment of program process, evaluates the fidelity and quality of a program’s implementation.

May be done as a freestanding evaluation of the activities and operations of the program.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Program monitoring

A

When the process evaluation is an ongoing function that occurs regularly, it will usually be referred to as program monitoring.

may also include information about the status of program participants on targeted outcomes after they have completed the program and thus also include outcome monitoring.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Effectiveness of the Program: Impact Evaluation

A

Gauged by the change it produces in outcomes (EG: new behavior or mindset)

Asks whether the desired outcomes were actually attained.

depend in large part on whether it adequately operationalizes and implements an effective theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Cost Analysis and Efficiency Assessment

A

Cost analysis

Efficiency assessment

Cost- benefit or cost-effectiveness analysis

Asks if a program can be done cheaper

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Implementation failure

A

when the effects are null or weak because the program activities assumed necessary to bring about the desired improvements did not actually occur as intended

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Theory failure

A

When the program conceptualization and design are not capable of generating the desired outcomes no matter how well implemented

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Evaluation Sponsor

A

Person who commissions evaluation (Jeanna Somm)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Stakeholders

A

Individuals, groups, or organizations with significant interest in program (Carlisle community members and those involved with the program). All those potentially affected.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Formative Evaluation

A

Intended to improve a program

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Summative Evaluation

A

Intended to make a summary judgment of a program performance usually to determine if the program should be:

Discontinued
Changed
Continued
disseminated/expanded

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Types of steak holder-evaluator relationships

A

Independent evaluation

Participatory or collaborative evaluation

Empowerment evaluation

20
Q

Independent evaluation

A

Evaluator solely evaluating

21
Q

Participatory or collaborative evaluation

A

Evaluation sponsor, staff, and program work more closely with evaluator to develop questions and means of evaluation. Also allows for feedback.

22
Q

Empowerment evaluation

A

Initial participatory with the intention of teaching evaluation to stakeholders

23
Q

Cost-benefit and cost-efficiency

A

Efficiency assessments may take the form of cost- benefit analysis or cost-effectiveness analysis, asking, respectively, whether a program produces sufficient benefits in relation to its costs and whether other interventions or delivery systems can produce the benefits at a lower cost.

24
Q

Incidence

A

Number of new instances of a particular problem in a specified area or context during a specified time

25
Q

Prevalence

A

Total number of existing cases in that area at a specified time

26
Q

Rate

A

The occurrence or existence of a particular condition expressed as a proportion of units in the relevant population (e.g., deaths per 1,000 adults)

27
Q

Probability sampling

A

characteristics of the sample can be used to estimate the characteristics of the full population

28
Q

A social indicator

A

A periodic measurement designed to track the course of a social condition over time

29
Q

Forecasting Needs

A

Can estimate the magnitude of a social problem in the future

Forecasting of future trends can be risky as factors can interrupt outcomes

30
Q

population at risk

A

Those persons or units with a significant probability of experiencing or developing the condition to which the program is designed to respond. Thus, the population at risk in birth control programs is usually defined as women of childbearing age.

31
Q

Population in need

A

identified through direct assessments of their condition. For instance, there are reliable and valid literacy tests that can be used to identify functionally illiterate persons who constitute the population in need for adult literacy programs.

32
Q

Why Qualitative Methods for Describing Needs.

A

Useful for obtaining detailed, textured knowledge of the specific needs in question. Specifies how to relatively address the need for the target population.

Can range from interviews of a few persons to elaborate and detailed ethnographic research.

33
Q

What Qualitative Methods for Describing Needs.

A

Focus groups.

Snowball sampling.

34
Q

Types of program theories

A

Articulated program theory

Implicit program theory

35
Q

Articulated Program Theory

A

Specific

Based on behavior or behavior change theory

Social science based

(CASEL SEL)

36
Q

Implicit Program Theory

A

When the underlying assumptions about how program services and
practices are presumed to accomplish their purposes have not been fully
articulated and recorded (SPY SEL)

37
Q

Evaluability assessments

A

Can this program be evaluated?

What are they doing and what the have to accomplish?
Goals and objectives are good?

Say a program wants to develop grit. But What is grit? How to you develop it? Measure?

Must assess stakeholders. Do they want evaluation? Will they actually use data?

38
Q

Three Ways to Describe a Program

A

Impact theory

Service utilization plan

Organization plan

39
Q

Impact theory (what we are doing for SPY)

A

Explains a causal theory

Mechanisms of change

EG: SPY programming prevents summer slide

40
Q

Impact Theory Failure

A

Assuming that mechanisms are false
EG Scared straight

Does the research literature support this program theory? SPY is supported, but SS is not.

41
Q

Service utilization plan

A

Service audit

How much of what services need active mechanisms to change

Expressed through point of view of service target
What will happen to a student who joins SPY?

42
Q

Organization plan

A

What resources are needed on the front line and behind the scenes?
What kind of staff? Training? Experience?
EG: SPY gives SEL training

Expressed through view point of management

43
Q

Eliciting Program Theory

A

Define program boundaries

Specify goals and objectives

List program functions, components and activities

Develop a flow chart that links logic of what the program does to what the program hopes to accomplish

44
Q

Assessing Program Theory

A

Does program match needs assessment?

Is the program logical?

Does program match what we know from research?

45
Q

Black box evaluation

A

If program process theory is also poorly specified, it will not even be possible to adequately describe the nature of the program that produced, or failed to produce, the outcomes of interest.