evangelicalism - ault, spirit and flesh Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

general

A
  • Obstacles presented by fundamentalism
  • Territory consists of boundaries
    o Quite distinct from other denominations
    o Isolated. But try to bring messages to other Churches.
    o Dichotomy of salvation vs. condemnation
    o Separation form social relationship. No indifference
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

xi valenti

A
  • ‘VP of the Massachusets chapter of the Moral Majority, the new-right organisation.
  • He was called on by the media to rep the moral majority POV at a time when popular mobilisation of its pro-family agenda was growing and transforming American politics beyond recognition.
  • I had met him a year before while beginning sociological research to better understand popular support for this new-style conservatism marching proudly behind the banner of ‘family values’. As a sixties radical who had embraced the anti-war movement, feminism and other new-left enthusiasms of the day, I saw “pro-family” conservativism as so foreign to my own politics that I was convinced anthropological methods were the best way to understand it.’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

ault motive

A
  • Wanted to conduct documentary film about Valenti church
  • Aware that he is not saved and that therefore would be viewed as unable to understand spiritual things/meaning of Bible
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

ault approach to study

A
  • story arises from relationships – affected by both backgrounds
  • (consider the way a researcher’s background affects their study subjectively – all aspects of socio-cultural world depend on subjective assumptions, beliefs and values of conscious subjects)
  • starting points of sociologists affect the way they approach questions
  • reflects Weberian idea that all knowledge of social reality is linked to values of knower
  • wrong to view sociology as utterly objective and universal
  • grew up in home of Methodist minister
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

valentis marriage

A
  • marriage changed after conversion to Xianity – became more solid and began to communicate
  • common for members of Shawmut River and churches like it
  • ‘But there was a startling paradox embedded in Frank and Sharon’s story. Fundamentalists are often seen by outsiders to be rigidly opposed to change, even crippled by their fear of it. Yet in Frank and Sharon’s story the whole point of being saved was the process of change it had unleashed in their lives.’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Sunday worship

A
  • no one wore a robe, wore street clothes – extreme example of Luther’s reformation of priesthood
  • attended as many services as possible
  • ‘The question of my (or anyone’s) salvation was, in any case, posed at the end of each service when Pastor Valenti gave ‘the invitation’ over the closing hymn. But in time, the matter of my salvation would be taken up more directly by those in charge.’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

View of scholarship on fundamentalist conservativism and how Shawmut river might help

A
  • people tend to dismiss fundamentalism as archaic – they do not understand how people could still believe in fundamentalist ideas
  • ‘I thought better sense might be made of fundamentalist beliefs by seeing them in the context of the key institution accounting for their persistence in modern life: the local church.’
  • ‘Recognising how weakness in existing scholarship stemmed from neglect of the local church, I wondered whether Shawmut river might hold some important lessons for understanding the very nature of Protestant fundamentalism in America. What could be learnt about fundamentalist thinking and practice by seeing them in their natural context – in the local congregation w its weekly round of worship services, Sunday school classes and home-based bible studies and prayer groups.’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

the role of the family in the church

A
  • many conservatives relied on relatives/family friends for child care etc.
  • Shawmut river – family = building blocks of family life
    ½ of church membership = 5 family groups
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

relationship between New Right politics and outsiders

A
  • sally = ready to give but hostile to public welfare
    o seeing conservative politics through the lens of life lived through fam obligations governed by reciprocity helps make sense of conservative statements we might otherwise dismiss as paranoid or irrational.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Puzzle posed by relationship between New Right enthusiasms and liberals

A
  • conservatives opposes abortion as murder yet support militarism
    o ‘Liberals often see this pairing as evidence of hypocrisy or hopeless illogic. However, seeing the right to life and militarism through the lens of a life lived through reciprocities within a family circle shows how extraordinarily consistent they are, for both express family-like obligations of an ultimate kind: for men, to take up arms and even sacrifice their lives to defend women and children; and for women, to risk their lives to bear and care for children and other dependents. In these idealisations, family obligations appear as matters not of choice but of unquestionable duty.’
  • We assume that our pattern of family life = ideal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Limit to female segregation in the family

A
  • ‘A touchstone of the feminist critique of the family in the 1960s and 70s was that bc women were socially isolated in the private sphere of family life, they were removed from the discourses and power structures of public life. But the role of housewife and mother did not isolate the women of the Shawmut river socially. Instead, it bound them in cooperative relations w women relatives – cross-generational groups in which their common identity as women was collectively fashioned.’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Minority who had not grown up in circles of cooperating kin

A
  • Jean Strong told me that her mother, because of her mental afflictions, had cut off her family’s contacts with relatives nearby.
  • ‘I was struck by how many women leaders in birthright and Shawmut river had experienced extended-family life as problematic in one way or another early in life before settling into their husbands’ kin networks and building strong local ties w their own daughters. It was no wonder then that they more readily noticed and could more easily articulate what their followers took for granted: that family life of this kind could not be taken for granted but was under attack.’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Ault response to why he hadn’t accepted Christ

A
  • ‘I explained that my work involved ‘placing myself as an observer who’s going to explain something to outsiders. You can’t observe worship and worship right at the same time.’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Pitching of documentary and use of language

A
  • when I recounted to frank and Sharon the genesis of my idea to make a documentary about Shawmut river, my experience among them, I said, had persuaded me that a true-to-life portrait of such a church would help correct some of the misperceptions of fundamentalist xians prevalent in public life: among them, the fixation on the empires of TV evangelists the differences between Christians etc. I told the congregation that my desire had grown from wanting to do research for a book to tell this story to a wider audience to help correct some of the distorted views of fundamentalism at large.
    o He sort of lied to them: 142 he said “I have been impressed w how local fundamentalist churches help restore and defend trad family valies…”
    o 143 “I have faith that whatever you decide about this project, the Lord will work through this body for the best”. whatever qualms I had about speaking in these terms as an unbeliever were assuaged by my sense that I was merely conveying my sociological understandings about how their community worked in their own theol lang.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

small groups in converting

A
  • ‘I was aware that the more common way new souls were won at Shawmut river was not simply through the invitation but through bible study groups in the homes of relatives or friends. It was above all, in those more intimate conversations, I would see, that people acquired the lang, or discourses, of a new faith. That winter, I experienced such evangelism in a small bible study group.’
  • ‘I was invited to request prayer on my own behalf, something I came to genuinely welcome, especially for my film project. It was a comfort to have our group pray for my needs and I had come to reckon, like pascal, that if there were a God who answered prayer, I would not want to pass up the opportunity to avail myself of that prayer.’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Church reaction to film approval

A
  • Pastor Valenti fasted for the film grant
  • Prayer Warriors (group of men in church) had been praying for the project
  • ‘Despite my scepticism, I had to ask myself: Had all these prayers, indeed, been answered?’
17
Q

church view on ault salvation

A
  • rumour = he could be saved
  • A says this may ass legitimacy to the film project
  • People would object to unsaved person making a film about their congregation
  • But does this mean that A has conveyed a false impression of himself, esp. given offering of prayer at bible study?
18
Q

Why did the women in the church embrace fundamentalist teachings on submission, which gave their husbands final say over them? - general

A
  • In the kind of family found at Shawmut river, the roles of housewife and mother did not isolate women socially, as the feminist critique of the family supposed.
  • With the help and support of other women relatives to rely on, women at Shawmut river exercised a certain factual control over the continuous flow of the varied and densely connected things that make up domestic life.
  • ‘It would be preposterous to imagine husbands dominating their wives. If anything, I had the impression that greater factual control of all the dense, interconnected things making up domestic life – and therefore subliminal authority – rested in women’s hands.’
19
Q

Why did the women in the church embrace fundamentalist teachings on submission, which gave their husbands final say over them? - valenti

A
  • Sharon Valenti
    o Said she had control over biblical issues
    o Xianity elevates women
    o “The man’s the head,” Sharon once quipped about men’s headship in church and family. “the woman’s the neck that turns the head”.
20
Q

Why did the women in the church embrace fundamentalist teachings on submission, which gave their husbands final say over them? - why it makes sense

A
  • ‘From this perspective, it is also easier to understand why women, who generally make up a majority in fundamentalist churches, accept a model of governance that excludes them from positions of formal authority. And why they, on occasion, vigorously defend such traditional gender arrangements in the face of feminist criticism. For the powers they have at their fingertips, and customarily rely on to protect their interests in both church and family, depend on traditional oppositions that cast men as individually accountable heads of households by the same stroke they cast women as nurturing caregivers. In this context, women’s power resides in an exclusive sphere of women’s responsibilities, relationships and talk created in and through – not despite – traditional gender roles in the family.’
  • I.e. in the context of the church/family, women are not oppressed – rooted in biblical emphasis on family
21
Q

effect of church split

A
  • ‘After the church split, it was difficult attending the secessionist bible study at the Strongs’ while continuing to see the valentis and those loyal to them. I found myself caught between two warring parties, having relations of trust and affection for those on both sides.’
  • Reverend Davis succeeds Valenti as Shawmut River’s second pastor
  • Irony – it was a woman (Jean Strong) who was important in emphasising that Valenti had ‘strayed’ from God’s word
  • Inevitable part of open conflict as personal betrayal – splinter groups = normal
22
Q

effect of film

A
  • I was shocked and saddened that our film had caused the Valentis harm - even persecution – in this way and that it had deprived frank of this opportunity to advance his education. When Born Again aired, someone at his college took offense at how SR’s teenagers came across – wasn’t what a Xian school should look like.
  • Personal significance: led A back to faith of his youth
  • Has both sociology and autobiographical significance – the church not only provided him with material but also faith
23
Q

Sharon reaction to Falwell

A
  • Thought he had blurred the line between liberalism and evangelicalism too significantly – he removed the Baptist from Liberty University, students wore jeans and heels and he had hosted a group of homosexuals at his church