EVALUATION PAPER 1 Flashcards
1
Q
L2 MEMORY: Multi-store model of memory
A
- KF
- HM
- Baddeley
2
Q
L3 MEMORY: Types of LTM
A
- Clive Wearing
- Case study
- Tulving (brain scans)
3
Q
L4 MEMORY: Working Memory Model
A
- KF
- Braver et al (brain scans)
- Baddeley et al (dual-task performance)
4
Q
L5 MEMORY: Retrieval failure
A
- Baddeley and Hitch (rugby)
- Lab studies (high control)
- Lab studies (low mundane realism)
5
Q
L6 MEMORY: Interference theory
A
- Carter and Cassady, Godden and Baddeley
- Locations need to be completely different
- EWT can be improved in the CI
6
Q
L7 MEMORY: Misleading information
A
- Loftus and Palmer and Gabbert et al
- Low mundane realism
- Older people are less accurate than younger people so tell us little
7
Q
L8 MEMORY: Anxiety
A
- Johnson and Scott and Christianson and Hubinette
- Pickel (surprise)
- Unethical to create anxiety in ppts
8
Q
L9 MEMORY: Cognitive Interview
A
- RWA (effective for police)
- Kohnken et al
- Time consuming (enhanced CI)
9
Q
L1 SOCIAL INFLUENCE: Asch
A
- McCarthyism
- Ethical issues
- Only used male American volunteers
10
Q
L2 SOCIAL INFLUENCE: Types and explanations of conformity
A
- Asch post interviews supports NSI
- More appropriate to consider NSI and ISI together
- NSI doesn’t affect people who don’t care about social approval.
11
Q
L3 SOCIAL INFLUENCE: Zimbardo
A
- Zimbardo’s dual role
- Abu Gharib (situational factors)
- Richer and Haslam (BBC Prison Study; social identity theory)
12
Q
L4 SOCIAL INFLUENCE: Milgram
A
- Unethical (negative inducements)
- La Jeu de la Mort (80% gave maximum shock levels)
- Hofling: 21/22 nurses obeyed unjustified demands from doctors
13
Q
L4 SOCIAL INFLUENCE: Milgram’s variations
A
- Systematically altered one variable at a time
- Bickman (NYC security 2x obeyed)
- RWA (excuses the Nazi’s behaviour)
14
Q
L5 SOCIAL INFLUENCE: Social-psychological explanations of obedience
A
- Abu Gharib
- RWA (implications for legal systems)
- Film of Milgram - researcher at fault due to legitimacy authority
15
Q
L6 SOCIAL INFLUENCE: Dispositional explanations of obedience
A
- Elms and Milgram
- Correlations
- Flawed methodology (acquiesces in that f-scale only measures tendency to agree with everything)