ATTACHMENT Flashcards
What is an attachment?
Close two-way emotional bond between two individuals where each individual sees the other as essential for their own emotional security. .
How long does it take for a human’s first attachment to develop?
7 months
What are the attachment behaviours (5)
- Proximity (people stay physically close to those they are attached to)
- Separation anxiety (distress when leaving PAF presence)
- Secure-base behaviour (tend to make regular contact with our PAFs)
- Stranger anxiety (infant is distressed when in close proximity to strangers)
- Reunion behaviour (infant shows pleasure when reunited with the PAF)
What are caregiver-infant interactions?
Refers to the communication between a caregiver and infant. It is believed that these interactions have important functions for the child’s social development and form the basis of the attachment between the two. Particularly, the more responsive or sensitive they are to each other’s signals, the deeper the bond.
What is a caregiver?
Any person who provides care for a child
What is an infant?
Usually taken to refer to a child’s first year of life, although some psychologists also include the second year.
What is reciprocity?
Two way/mutual process - each party responds to the other’s signals to sustain the interaction. An interaction is reciprocal when each person responds to the other and the behaviour of each party elicits a response from the other. The sensitivity lays the foundation for later attachment)
What is interactional synchrony?
When a caregiver and infant reflect the actions and emotions of the other in a coordinated way. They mirror each other in terms of their facial and body movements.
What was the procedure of Meltzoff and Moore’s study?
Observed the beginnings of interactional synchrony in infants as young as two weeks old. An adult displayed one of three facial expressions or one of three distinctive gestures. The infant’s response was filmed and identified by independent observers using a number of behavioural categories. The observers did not know what the infants had seen.
What were the findings of Meltzoff and Moore’s study?
An association was found between the expression or gesture the adult had displayed and the actions of the babies.
What did Isabella et al find?
Interactional synchrony is important for the development of mother-infant attachments. Isabella et al observed 30 mothers and infants together and assessed the degree of synchrony. They found high levels of synchrony were associated with better quality of mother-infant attachment.
Give a piece of supporting evidence for caregiver interactions
Meltzoff and Moore’s study along with Isabella et al.’s study support the importance of interactional synchrony in social development and attachment. This suggests that interactional synchrony may have a special meaning as it is important for the development of attachment and to help infants to begin to acquire an understanding of what other people are thinking and feeling, which is fundamental for social relationships.
Give a strength of research supporting the ideas about caregiver-infant interactions
Observations of mother infant interactions are generlaly well-controlled procedures, with both the mother and infant being filmed, often from multiple angles. The angles often include those that mean that the researcher analysing the video footage cannot see what the other person in the video is doing. Additionally, babies don’t know or care that they are being observed. As babies don’t know or care that they are being observed, this reduces the likelihood of demand characteristics and social desirability bias which are normally a problems for observational research. This ensures that the research has good IV and so we can make valid conclusions about the importance of caregiver-infant interactions. It also means that the research can be replicated to check reliability of the results.
Give a weakness of the research supporting the ideas about caregiver-infant interactions
Feldman points out that IS and R simply describe behaviours that occur at the same time. They are robust phenomena that can be reliably observed, but this may not be particularly useful as it doesn’t tell us their purpose (why they are done). Therefore, we can’t understand why infants reciprocate and imitate their caregivers, so we can’t be certain that they have a special meaning.
What are 5 general challenges that researchers face when conducting attachment research
- The context may affect the infant’s behaviour, especially if they’re in an unfamiliar environment
- They have to do fewer and shorter observation periods because there is a limited period in which the infant is awake
- They have to be very careful to be ethical e.g., any short separation from the caregiver may be distressing to the infant
- You can’t ask the infant why they are doing something, so it relies on inferences from the researcher
- Infants generally move a lot - it can be difficult to distinguish what is general movement and what is deliberate movement.
Give an overview of Schaffer’s stages of attachment
Attachment develops in stages/steps. They are description of how attachment develops that Schaffer developed from his research with Emerson.
What are the 4 stages of attachment, and when do they form?
- Asocial stage (first few weeks)
- Indiscriminate attachment (from 2-7 months)
- Specific attachment (from around 7 months)
- Multiple attachments (after babies start to show attachment behaviour)
Outline the asocial stage of attachment
The baby recognises and starts to form a bond with it carers. however, the babys behaviour towards non-human objects and humans is quite similar. babies show some preference for familiar adults, in that those individuals find it easier to calm them. babies are also happier when in the presence of other humans
Outline the indiscriminate stage of attachment
They show a preference for people rather than inanimate objects and recognise and prefer familiar adults. They can distinguish between familiar and unfamiliar people. Babies accept cuddles and comfort from adult, and don’t show separation or stranger anxiety.
Outline the specific stage of attachment
Majority of babies start to display anxiety towards strangers and to become anxious when separated from one particular adult. Equally, they show especial joy at reunion with that particular adult and are most comforted by them.
Outline the multiple attachments stage in Schaffer’s stage of attachment
These relationships are called secondary attachments. In Schaffer and Emerson’s study, 29% of the children had secondary attachments within a month of forming a primary attachment.
Outline the key findings of Schaffer and Emerson’s study
- Fathers were rarely the first sole object of attachment (3%) but 27% of them were the first joint object.
- 30% displayed multiple attachments
- 75% of infants formed an attachment with their father by 18 months
Give evidence to undermine the stages of attachment theory (cultures)
In collectivist cultures, people are more focused on the needs of the group rather than the individuals. In such societies, we mught expect multuple attachments to be more common. Research supports this. It has been found that the closeness of attachment with mothers was almost twice as common in family-based sleeping arrangements compared to communal environments. This suggests that the stage model applies specifically to individualist cultures and so lacks EV. It may tell us less about how attachments develop in other cultures.
Give one weakness of the supporting evidence for the stages of attachment (Schaffer and Emerson)
The sample was biased in a number of ways. All the families were from the same district and social class in the same city, at a time over 50 years ago. Child-rearing practices vary from one culture to another and one historical period to another. For instance, more women now go out to work so many children are cared for outside of the home, and more fathers choose to stay at home and care for their children. Therefore, the results of the study do not necessarily generalise well to other social and historical contexts and so may not tell us as much about how and when attachments develop today.
Give a strength of the supporting evidence of the stages of attachment (Schaffer and Emerson’s study)
The study was carried out longitudinally. This means that the same children were followed-up and observed regularly. This suggests that the results will be of a higher IV than a cross-sectional study would have been because they do not have the CV of individual differences between participants. Therefore, the conclusion about how and when attachments develop is valid and so is strong support for the stages of attachment theory.
Who is the father in attachment research?
Anyone who takes on the role of the main male caregiver. This can be but is not necessarily the biological father.
Why do children turn to fathers rather than mothers?
- Play
- Providing challenging situations
- Secure environment to learn to be brave
What did Schaffer and Emerson find out about the role of the father?
- Majority of babies did become attached to their mother first (PAF)
- Within a few weeks/months of the PA, the infants formed SA to other family members
- 75% formed an attachment with the father by 18 months
Why might the mother and father roles be different?
- Most men are not psychologically equipped for forming in intense attachment because they lack emotional sensitivity that women offer (biological and social factors)
- Fathers do not become the PAF because of traditional gender roles
- Female hormones create higher levels of nurturing and therefore women are biologically predisposed to be the PAF.
What has been found about the importance of the father’s role to the infant’s development? (Grossman)
Grossman carried out a longitudinal study looking at both parents’ behaviour and its relationship to the quality of children’s attachments into their teens. Quality of infant attachment to mothers, but not fathers, was related to children’s attachments in adolescence, suggesting that father attachment was less important.
However, the quality of father’s play with infants was related to the quality of adolescent attachments. This suggests that fathers have a different role in attachment - one that is more to do with play and simulation and less to do with nurturing.
What evidence suggests that fathers can be primary attachment figures and take on the nurturing role
Field filmed 4 month old babies in face-to-face interactions with primary caregiver mothers, secondary caregiver fathers and primary caregiver fathers. Primary caregiver fathers, like mothers, spent more time smiling, imitating and holding infants than secondary caregiver fathers. This behaviour appears to be important in building an attachment with the infant.
Therefore, it seems that fathers can be the more nurturing attachment figure. The key to the attachment relationship is the level of responsiveness, not the gender of the parent.
Give a weakness of the distinct role of fathers
Research into the role of fathers in attachment is confusing bcs researchers who study them ask different research questions. Some are interested in understanding the role of fathers as secondary attachment figures whereas others are more concerned with the father as a PAF. The former have tended to see fathers behaving differently from mothers and having a distinct role. The latter have tended to find that fathers can take on a ‘maternal’ role. These inconsistent findings are a problem because it means that psychologists cannot easily answer the seemingly straightforward question of: ‘what is the role of the father?’
Give a weakness of the claim that fathers do not play a distinct role
The claim that children without fathers are no different from those with fathers suggests that the father’s role is secondary. This poses huge ethical issues as it is socially sensitive research. This could suggest that fathers do not play a significant role in their children’s lives. This could create distress for fathers and may even lead to reduced rights for fathers in legal proceedings and wider society.
Give a piece of real world application supporting the role of the father
The research on role of the father can be used to offer advice to parents. Parents and prospective parents sometimes agonise over decisions like who should take the primary caregiver role. Mothers may feel pressured to stay home because of stereotypical views about the roles of mothers and fathers. Equally, fathers may feel pressured to focus on work rather than parenting. In some families, this is not the best economical decision. Therefore the research can offer reassuring advice to parents. For example, heterosexual parents can be informed that fathers are quite capable of becoming primary attachment figures (Field’s research). Also, same-sex parents and single-mother families can be informed that not having a father around does not affect their child’s development as they can take on the nurturing and play roles. This supports the external validity of the research because it can be used to reduce parental anxiety about the role of fathers.
What was the procedure of Lorenz’s study?
Randomly divided a large clutch of goose eggs. Hald the eggs were hatched with the mother goose in their natural environment. The other half were hatched in an incubator and the first person they saw was Lorenz.
What were the findings of Lorenz’s study?
The incubator group followed Lorenz everywhere whereas in the control group, they followed the mother duck. When the two groups were mixed - they still followed who they were following before. This is known as imprinting.
Define imprinting
Innate readiness to develop a strong bond with the mother, which takes place during a specific time in development. If it doesn’t happen at this time, it probably won’t happen i.e., there is a critical period. It is irreversible and long-lasting
Give a weakness of Lorenz’s study (birds)
Lorenz was interested in imprinting in birds. Although some of his findings have influenced our understanding of human development, there is a problem in generalising findings on birds to humans. The mammalian attachment system seems to be quite different from that in birds e.g. mammalian mothers show more emotional attachment to young than birds do i.e., reciprocity and interactional synchrony, and mammals may be able to form attachments at any time (although less easily than during infancy). This means that it may not be appropriate to try to generalise any of Lorenz’s ideas to humans. As such, Lorenz’s study may have low external validity and may not tell us as much about human attachment as we may have previously thought. For instance, it may be that the consequences for missing the critical period of attachment are not as severe (or more severe) in humans compared to the animals in Lorenz’s study.
Give a piece of supporting evidence for Lorenz’s study (chickens)
Research has found that chickens exposed to yellow rubber gloves for feeding them during the first few weeks became imprinted on the gloves and would try to mate with them as adults. This supports the idea that young animals imprint on any moving thing that is present during the critical period of development and so suggests that his results have some external validity to other birds. Therefore, the inferences we can draw about humans from Lorenz’s study about humans having a critical period for attachment may have some validity.
Give a strength of Lorenz’s study (control group)
Lorenz had a control group where the eggs were hatched with the mother goose and an experimental group where they were hatched with him. This enabled Lorenz to establish cause and effect between the first moving object that the goslings see and who they imprint on. Therefore we can be more confident that his conclusions about how imprinting occurs on the first moving object that the goslings see is universal and occurs regardless of the species of the first moving object seen by the infant animal. Therefore, we can be more confident in the inferences we draw from the study about human attachment occurring during a critical period.
Describe the procedure and the results of Harlow’s study
Monkeys were in a cage with two ‘mothers’ - one made of wire (which had a bottle on it) and one made of cloth (which did not have a bottle on it). Harlow then measured how much time the monkeys spent with each ‘mother’
Findings - spent the most time with the cloth mother and only went to the wire mother for food
A mechanical teddy bear was introduced to the cage to frighten the monkey. Harlow measured which ‘mother’ the monkey ran to.
Findings - the cloth one to offer the monkey contact comfort
Control group - the bottle was on the cloth mother and the monkey went to it for both weaning and comfort.
Explain ethical issues with Harlow’s study (ones that are relevant to non-human animals). Could the study be justified in any way?
Protection from harm: monkeys were deliberately scared by the mechanical teddy bear. There would also have been significant distress for the mothers when separated from their babies. However, this may be justified as the benefits (see challenge question below) may outweigh this short term distress to the monkeys.
What long term effects might there be for the rhesus monkeys in Harlow’s study?
As a result of the maternal deprivation (being deprived of a real mother figure), the monkeys grew up to be socially abnormal. This included being less sociable than other monkeys, less effective parents (neglect and kill them). They were also sexually abnormal (including less skilled at mating, mated less than other monkeys). When approached by other monkeys, they would freeze, flee or be aggressive.
Give an real-world application for Harlow’s study?
His findings have had a massive impact on psychologists understanding of human mother-infant attachment. Harlow showed than attachment was formed as a result of contact comfort, as well as the importance of the quality of early relationships for later social development. This supports the external validity of Harlow’s conclusions as they can be applied to species beyond monkeys to have a profound effect on mother-infant attachment, suggesting that they tell us something important about human attachment.