EU Approach to International Trade Regimes and Climate Change Mitigation Flashcards

1
Q

What are the main overarching questions of this lecture on trade & CC mitigation? (2)

A

1/ What is the better approach to trade and CC mitigation issues?

2/ A unilateral or plurilateral approach?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the key issues related to unilateralism in trade & envtal matters? (2)

A

1/ extraterritoriality

2/ unilateral nature of measures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is a major question related to unilateralism in trade & envtal matters?

A

Can States legally address harm occurring outside their jurisdiction through trade restrictions?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are 2 relevant cases on topic of unilateralism in trade & envtal matters?

A

1/ US-Tuna (Mexico) - 1991 GATT Panel Report

2/ US-Shrimp - 1998 WTO AB Report

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are arguments related to extraterritoriality which oppose the use of trade measures addressing harm abroad? (2)

A

1/ formal jurisdictional objections

2/ eco-imperialism or economic coercion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Contributions of US-Tuna (Mexico) Report regarding extraterritoriality argument? (2)

A

1/ US ban on tuna imports = ‘extrajurisdictional’

2/ MS cannot force other parties to change their policies within their jurisdiction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Contribution US-Shrimp Report regarding extraterritoriality and eco-imperialism/coercion?

A

Conditioning market access on unilateral public interest measure may, to some degree, be a common aspect of measures falling within scope of Art. XX GATT public policy exceptions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are arguments related to unilateralism which oppose trade measures addressing harm abroad? (2)

A

1/ lack of inclusion/consultation

2/ lack of calibration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Contribution US-Shrimp Report regarding unilateralism arguments? (3)

A

1/ US had not engaged in serious negotiations before enforcing its unilateral import prohibition

2/ US shrimp ban was rigid and unbending standard

3/ US shrimp ban did not take into consideration different conditions other MS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Which case is relevant regarding jurisdiction of EU to regulate harm occurring abroad?

A

ATAA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Contribution ATAA case on ECJ’s approach to extraterritoriality EU law? (5)

A

1/ Art. 3(5) TEU: EU must observe IL in its entirety

2/ but permissive stance: if absence of a rule prohibiting from legislating extraterritorially, possibility to do so as long as rules enforced within territory

3/ enforcement in EU territory is therefore trigger for EU jurisdiction

4/ element of choice

5/ no consideration of extraterritorial economic coercive effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Which arguments related to EU law are relevant to address concerns of unilateralism (extraterritoriality)? (5)

A

1/ Arts. 3(5) and 21(1)(2)(f) TEU

2/ WTO DSB decisions binding in EU legal order

3/ Art. 11 TEU and Art. 2 Prot. 2: consultations with stakeholders

4/ broad discretion EU institutions to comply with pcple of proportionality (cf Inuit II)

5/ safety valves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is lacking regarding consultations with stakeholders pursuant to Art. 11 TEU and Art. 2 Prot. 2? (3)

A

1/ contributes to legitimacy

2/ but does not ensure a legal right allowing for legal contestation

3/ cf Inuit II: only procedural rules of legal basis are relevant, there is not always an obligation to consult stakeholders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are other EU constitutional law constraints regarding trade and envt? (4)

A

1/ EU Treaties set out both free trade & envtal goals and objectives (Art. 3(3)(5) TEU, Art. 21(2)(e-f) TEU)

2/ no hierarchy clauses

3/ but integration articles (Art. 11 TFEU)

4/ consistency required between different areas of external action (Art. 21(3) TEU)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Considerations on CBAM? (6)

A

1/ legal basis: Art. 192(1) TFEU

2/ producer-based measures

3/ carbon price for emissions embedded in imports

4/ aim: prevent carbon leakage

5/ scope: cement, electricity, fertilisers, steel, aluminium, hydrogen

6/ revenue will go to EU budget

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is attempt of Trade Policy Review of 2021?

A

Attempt to mainstream climate policy objectives across trade instruments

17
Q

Examples of Trade Policy Review attempt to mainstream climate policy objectives across trade instruments? (6)

A

1/ sustainability elevated to defining feature of EU trade policy

2/ FTAs supposed to facilitate proliferation green technologies

3/ Paris Agreement commitments in all future FTAs

4/ emphasis on stronger enforcement

5/ sustainable investment initiatives aimed at Africa

6/ coordinating bilateral negotiations with unilateral instruments, initiatives in WTO

18
Q

How are trade and sustainability commitments linked in practice?

A

Sustainability impact assessments for FTAs

19
Q

Characteristics sustainability impact assessments (SIAs) for FTAs? (4)

A

1/ aim: promote evidence-based policymaking

2/ EC asks external consultant to measure envtal and societal impact of proposed FTA

3/ EC presents political framing of the consultant’s findings

4/ SIA to be conducted during trade negotiations so as to inform decisions of negotiators

20
Q

Which example illustrates the problems with SIAs and their credibility?

A

EU-Mercosur AA

21
Q

Why are SIAs problematic and lack credibility as illustrated by EU-Mercosur AA? (4)

A

1/ outcome FTA rarely corresponds to the various hypothetical scenarios with numerous variables in SIAs

2/ political framing is crucial: EC countered criticism about deforestation risks with arguments on regulatory capacity-building & unilateral EU policies, but it is questionable that the EU can influence domestic policies of 3rd country partners

3/ first SIA became obsolete, second SIA was finalised after end of negotiations

4/ Ombudsman: EC conduct constituted maladministration

22
Q

What are potential conflicts regarding trade liberalisation and climate objectives? (4)

A

1/ energy chapters in FTAs facilitate trade in fossil fuels

2/ trade liberalisation in agricultural products creates incentives to pursue deforestation and increases transport emissions

3/ but, there are attempts to mainstream sustainability considerations across trade agreements

4/ however, hierarchy between potentially conflicting constitutional objectives is unclear

23
Q

Examples of attempts to mainstream sustainability considerations across trade agreements? (3)

A

1/ regulatory cooperation and technology exchange on renewable energy (EU-Chile, EU-NZ FTAs)

2/ sustainability considerations in public procurement

3/ access to raw materials needed for green transition (EU-Chile FTA)

24
Q

Which instrument illustrates an attempt to foster envtal protection as complementary to trade liberalisation?

A

TSD chapters in recent FTAs

25
Q

Under which competence to TSD chapters fall? Case law? (4)

A

1/ Opinion 2/15 (EUSFTA)

2/ under scope CCP

3/ exclusive competence EU

4/ however, various TSD obligations are not linked to any trade conditionality but still exclusive competence

26
Q

Key takeaways of Commission’s Communication from June 2022, attempts to mainstream sustainability considerations across trade agreements? (4)

A

1/ prioritise trade in envtal goods and services

2/ stronger monitoring of compliance with TSD obligations

3/ stronger cooperation with civ. society organisations

4/ general DS & sanctions applicable (‘failure to comply which materially defeats object and purpose Paris Agreement’)

27
Q

Which example is a material manifestation of the EC’s new approach to trade agreements?

A

EU-NZ FTA

28
Q

Remarkable features EU-NZ FTA? (5)

A

1/ elimination of customs duties on envtal goods (Art. 2.5)

2/ envtal, labour and social considerations related to object of procurement allowed (Art. 14.2.4)

3/ more elaborate references to Paris Agreement in TSD chapter

4/ references to biodiversity, forests, fisheries

5/ ordinary DS applicable to TSD chapter (Art. 26.2)

29
Q

Features of sustainable investment facilitation agreements? (9)

A

1/ trade & dvpt linkages

2/ first ever agreement concluded with Angola in Nov. 2022

3/ modest ambitions: no regulation of market access or trade in goods/services

4/ MFN clause for mutual investment

5/ provisions on transparency applicable invst laws

6/ non-regression pcple

7/ right to regulate

8/ references to MEAs, incl. Paris Agreement

9/ technical assistance & capacity building