6 - EU Approach to International Investment Regimes and Climate Change Mitigation Flashcards

1
Q

What does this lecture on the EU’s approach to international investment regimes and climate change mitigation touch upon? (6)

A

1/ role and place of envtal protection in EU investment law and policy

2/ EU current substantive approach to investment protection standards

3/ relationship of invst protection standards and MS + EU ability to take necessary measures to combat CC

4/ EU current procedural approach to invst protection

5/ relationship procedural approach to invst protection and MS + EU ability to take necessary measures to combat CC

6/ ability EU to reform IIL under EU law, esp. in relation to existing & new invst agreements of EU and MS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Which case is discussed as explanatory example?

A

Rockhopper case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Considerations on Rockhopper case? (7)

A

1/ 2005 exploration permit

2/ 2010 prohibition of offshore drilling

3/ 2012 & 2014 legal exceptions to prohibition

4/ 2016 law ending exceptions

5/ 2016 denial of permit

6/ 2017 arbitration proceedings

7/ 2022 240 million EUR award

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Key questions of this lecture? (5)

A

1/ relationship btwn IIL and CC policies?

2/ impact of IIL on CC policies?

3/ what is response of EU?

4/ can EU meaningfully reform IIL?

5/ is EU approach to IAs adequate in light of its int. climate ambitions?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

History IIL? (4)

A

1/ colonial era (1800-1945)

2/ post-colonial era (1945-1990)

3/ global era (1990-2014)

4/ era of contestation (2014-current)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Characteristics colonial era IIL? (5)

A

1/ friendship, commerce and navigation treaties

2/ rational and content: protection of ind. doing business abroad

3/ strong ties with trade

4/ min, standards of protection for nationals doing business abroad

5/ espousal for DS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Characteristics post-colonial era IIL? (4)

A

1/ separation from trade agreements, mainly bilateral agreements

2/ North-South dynamics

3/ introduction of ISDS

4/ protection of ind. and legal entities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Characteristics global era IIL? (3)

A

1/ end of history?

2/ changing dynamics in int. political economy

3/ key examples: ECT, NAFTA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Characteristics era of contestation IIL? (3)

A

1/ litigation on agreements

2/ termination of IIAs

3/ efforts to reform IIAs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why are IIAs concluded? (3)

A

1/ initially, to facilitate commerce

2/ then, to protect and attract capital

3/ now, again to facilitate commerce

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

For whose and what benefit are IIAs concluded? (2)

A

1/ from individuals to corporations

2/ from protection of goods to all possible forms of invst

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What do IIAs include? (2)

A

1/ initially, min. standard of protection & espousal

2/ now, elaborate invst protection standards & ISDS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

History of EU relationship to IIL? (3)

A

1/ Treaty of Rome period (1958-1991)

2/ Treaty of Maastricht period (1991-2007)

3/ Treaty of Lisbon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Characteristics of Treaty of Rome period? (4)

A

1/ limited liberalisation of intra-EU capital movements

2/ no need for common external capital regime

3/ Keynesian thinking dominant (gvt involvement & control over capital flows)

4/ rejection of EU BITs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Characteristic Treaty of Maastricht period?

A

Limited EU competence related to invst liberalisation with third countries (current Art. 63 TFEU)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Characteristics Treaty of Lisbon period? (4)

A

1/ inclusion of FDI in scope of CCP (Art. 207 TFEU)

2/ shared competence for portfolio invst (Arts. 63 and 216(1) TFEU)

3/ shared competence for ISDS

4/ shared competence for termination of MS BITs (Arts. 207 and 63 TFEU)

17
Q

What are substantive basics of IIL? (3)

A

1/ def. of investment

2/ def. of investor

3/ market access

18
Q

Investment protection standards? (4)

A

1/ national treatment

2/ MFN treatment

3/ fair and equitable treatment

4/ right to compensation for expropriation

19
Q

Procedural basics of ISDS? (4)

A

1/ foreign investor access to int. arbitration over any asset

2/ generally no exhaustion domestic remedies

3/ remedies

4/ procedural rules (ICSID, UNCITRAL, enforcement)

20
Q

What are challenges for climate mitigation policies? (5)

A

1/ weak role and place of CC policies in invst treaties

2/ regulatory chill and ISDS

3/ just and fair transition

4/ flexibility in relation to CC policies

5/ ‘green’ investments under invst policies

21
Q

Considerations on regulatory chill? (3)

A

1/ incentives for gvts to be less ambitious or abandon CC policies

2/ direct and indirect effects

3/ delays, modification and abandonment

22
Q

What is a concrete example of challenge for climate mitigation policies?

A

NZE scenario and oil & gas projects

23
Q

What are advantages of using ICSID for fossil fuel investors? (8)

A

1/ higher amounts of compensation

2/ one-sided

3/ broad scope

4/ enforceable rights

5/ detached from national law

6/ exclusively focused on investor rights

7/ governed by invst arbitration community

8/ limited transparency

24
Q

What are responses to the situation of challenges to climate mitigation policies? (2)

A

1/ termination

2/ reform

25
Considerations on termination IIAs? (3)
1/ is it even possible? 2/ either withdrawal, denunciation or agreement 3/ sunset clauses
26
What is an interesting example of termination of IIAs? (4)
1/ South Africa Investment Protection Act 2015 2/ unilateral internal act 3/ copies investment rights from IIAs 4/ subjects disputes to jurisdiction of domestic courts
27
What types of reform are possible? (3)
1/ procedural 2/ investor rights 3/ investor obligations
28
Which procedural reforms are envisageable? (6)
1/ no ISDS 2/ exhaustion of domestic remedies 3/ carve-out of ISDS 4/ transparency requirements 5/ third party rights 6/ counterclaims
29
Which reforms of investor rights are envisageable? (3)
1/ carve-outs for definition of investment or investor 2/ change def. of substantive investor rights (e.g. FET) 3/ interpretative instruments
30
What is the EC's response to EU IIAs? (5)
1/ 'save the system' 2/ 2015 Commission Concept Paper 3/ 2015 TTIP proposal for an Investment Court System 4/ right to regulate clauses 5/ more language clarifying substantive rights
31
What would procedural aspects of the Investment Court System be? (3)
1/ appeal mechanism 2/ roster of arbitrators 3/ prepare for Multilateral Investment Court
32
Contribution of Opinion 1/17? (4)
1/ competence void 2/ incompatibility of IA with EU law if amendment or withdrawal of legislation required bc of assessment made by a tribunal outside EU on level of protection 3/ EU cannot conclude IAs setting up bodies competent to call into question choices democratically made on, e.g., level of envtal protection 4/ but only so if body can only award monetary damages, leading to a requirement to abandon achievement level of protection
33
EP position on IIL and climate mitigation policies? (2)
1/ 2017: consent to Council decision concluding CETA 2/ 2022: resolution on future of EU int. invst policy
34
What does EP resolution on future of EU int. invst policy contain? (3)
1/ carve-out for invst in fossil fuels 2/ exhaustion domestic remedies 3/ 3rd party rights
35
Considerations on 'modernisation' of ECT? (4)
1/ ECT = multilateral trade and invst agreement in energy sector (1998) 2/ 2018: EU modernisation initiative 3/ MS and Council not in favor 4/ EP resolution: full withdrawal if EC proposes
36
What can and does the EU do with respect to MS IIAs? (3)
1/ termination of existing MS IIAs (either by EU or by MS) 2/ blocking new or renegotiated agreements 3/ conditioning authorisation
37
Recap? (2)
1/ IIL entered a period of contestation as result of use by foreign investors of ISDS against public policy measures (incl. those aimed at addressing CC) 2/ EU response has largely been to save the system by making procedural and substantive changes to new IIAs