EPT lit Flashcards
How does Weisleder 2009 define sensitivity?
The proportion of cases correctly identified by means of a diagnostic test (Percent of vital teeth that test positive to EPT or cold)
How does Weisleder 2009 define specificity?
The proportion of non-cases correctly identified by means of a diagnostic test (Percent of necrotic teeth that do not respond to EPT cold)
How does Weisleder 2009 define positive predictive value?
The proportion of positive test results that are cases (Percent of positive EPT or cold responses that are vital) Therefore, those that are positive to EPT or cold but are necrotic are false positives.
How does Weisleder 2009 define negative predictive value?
The proportion of negative test results that are non-cases (Percent of negative EPT or cold responses that are necrotic) Threfore, those that are negative to EPT or cold but are vital are false negatives.
What is a false negative according to Weisleder 2009?
When a tooth tests negative to cold or EPT, but is vital.
What is a false positive according to Weisleder 2009?
When a tooth tests positive to cold or EPT, but is necrotic.
Sensitivity of cold and EPT (according to Weisleder 2009)?
cold 76%, EPT 92% (vital teeth that test positive)
Specificity of cold and EPT (according to Weisleder 2009)?
cold 92%, EPT 75% (necrotic teeth that test negative)
PPV of cold and EPT (according to Weisleder 2009)?
cold 93%, EPT 83% (positive results that are vital)
NPV of cold and EPT (according to Weisleder 2009)?
cold 74%, EPT 87% (negative results that are necrotic)
According to Weisleder 2009, if both cold and EPT were used, PPV is?
97% (of teeth that test positive to both tests are vital)
According to Weisleder 2009, if both cold and EPT were used, NPV is?
90% (of teeth that respond negatively to both tests are necrotic)
How does Peters, Baumgartner, Lorton 1994 define a false positive?
A tooth that is non-vital or partially non-vital that responds positively to a test (cold or EPT).
How does Peters, Baumgartner, Lorton 1994 define a false negative?
A tooth that is vital and responds negatively to a test (cold or EPT).
Who did Peters, Baumgartner, Lorton 1994 study?
60 patients referred for endodontic evaluation (1488 teeth).
Who showed that false pos. response to EPT significantly higher than cold. However, found that EPT false positives can be lowered if all responses above the tissue level are considered negative (to a percent that is not significantly different from cold)?
Peters, Baumgartner, Lorton 1994
Who showed that false positives to EPT were spread evenly throughout the mouth, while false positives to cold were only in multi-rooted teeth?
Peters, Baumgartner, Lorton 1994
Who showed a high incidence of probable false negatives to cold (no response to cold, but responses to both EPT’s), all but two of which were in patients over 60 years of age.?
Peters, Baumgartner, Lorton 1994
Who showed a false negative incidence for cold in patients under 50 to be 0.2%, and 20.6% in patients over age 60?
Peters, Baumgartner, Lorton 1994
Who showed when cold is applied to occlusal and cervical area, it usually responds to both, but if it responds to just one area, it is usually cervical (13.6%) rather than occlusal (0.4%)
Peters, Baumgartner, Lorton 1994
Who said “if adult untraumatized teeth do not respond to both the electrical and cold tests, there is a high probability that the tooth is pulpless.
Peters, Baumgartner, Lorton 1994
Who said it is much rarer to have a false positive to cold than EPT?
Peters, Baumgartner, Lorton 1994
How does Petersson define accuracy?
The extent to which a test correctly classifies patients
How many teeth did Petersson test?
46 teeth with vital pulps and 29 teeth with necrotic pulps (established by direct pulpal inspection).
How does Petersson 1999 define sensitivity?
The ability of a test to identify teeth that really are diseased (diseased= teeth with necrotic pulps) TP/ (TP + FN)
This is the opposite of Weisleder and Peters.
How does Petersson 1999 define specificity?
The ability of a test to identify teeth that are not diseased (vital pulps). TN/ (TN + FP)
This is the opposite of Weisleder and Peters.