Epidemiology Flashcards

1
Q

Event rate in control group

Event rate experimental group

A

Absolute risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Occurs because screening test are more likely to find slow growing tumors rather than those that are rapidly growing. This can bias in favor of screening because more slow growing cancers with a good prognosis will be found with a screening test

A

Lead time bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Occurs because study volunteers and persons willing to undergo screening test are likely to be compliant. Compliant patients have better outcomes

A

Compliance bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Occurs when two or more factors are associated with the outcome and only the one being studied is accounted for

A

Confounding bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Occurs when subjects for the study do not represent the population. This is avoided by having large representative samples

A

Selection bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

This occurs when care provided to the experimental and the control group differ substantially other than the intervention. It is avoided by blinding. Patients and doctors tend to behave differently when they know they are being studied. Radiomized blinded trials protect against this bias

A

Performance bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

There is no consistent relationship between blood levels of morphine and analgesic effects. Thus no single right dose. You should titrate to desired effect. This is because of?

A

Tolerance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Hypothesis that a there is no significant difference between two groups being compared to each other Thus is the p value is less than 0.05 REJECT IT

A

Null hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

When error occurs because too few are tested

A

Type 2 error

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Calculate the median number

127,104,103, 81, 86, 117, 89, 97, 95

A

First rank the numbers: 81, 86,89, 95, 97, 103, 104, 117, 127 then add the total number +1 divided by 2 to identify

Median= 97

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Calculate the mean?

81,86,89,95,97,103, 104,127,127

A
N=the total  number included in data set
n=9
81+86+89+95+97+103+104+117+127= 899
=899/n = 899/9
=99.89
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Calculate mode

81, 86, 89, 95, 97, 103, 104, 117, 127

The mode of a sample of data is the observation that occurs most frequently

A

There is no unique mode since each number in data set is listed only once

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The more cases you detect , the more false negatives will be included in your sample. Thus best screening test includes both both high sensitivity and high specificity

A

As sensivity increases specificity decreases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

In study diabetic pts w no intense treatment had 10% neuropathy, diabetic pts with intense therapy had 2% neuropathy how many diabetic patients need to be treated with intense therapy to prevent neuropathy?

A

first test is for NTT

NTT= 1/ABSOLUTE RELATIVE RISK
ARR= control group event rate - experimental group event rate
ARR= 10-2%= 8%  = .08
NTT=1/.08
=12.5
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

To prevent a disease from occurring at all by removing it’s cause

A

Primary prevention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

To detect disease early so intervention can prevent progression

A

Secondary prevention

17
Q

To reduce complications and mortality due to disease after it is recognized

A

Tertiary prevention

18
Q

Study of select subjects who are categorized based on outcomes and try to find associations with certain variables. Does not follow patients over Time

A

Case control

19
Q

Cohort looks at groups from zero and follows for specific time to find association the variable is not under researcher control

A

Cohort study

20
Q

Statistical method that allows for adjustment of con founders

A

Multivariate analysis

21
Q

A systematic review that combines the results of previous studies to evaluate the magnitude or direction of an effect on a subgroup

A

Meta analysis

22
Q

How often test will pick up,disease if it is there

A

Sensitivity

23
Q

The proportion of pts who do not have the disease and who will test negative for it

A

Specificity

24
Q

The amount of times the intervention or exposure increases (decreases) the risk of the outcome
The ratio incidence of outcome among exposed persons divided by total number

A

Relative risk.

25
Q

“. Disease X Absent
Test A result positive 30 (a) TP 50 (b) FP
Test A result negative 10 (c) FN 80 (d) TN”

Excerpt From: Alfred F. Tallia, Joseph E. Scherger & Nancy Dickey. “Swanson’s Family Medicine Review.” Saunders, 2013. iBooks.
This material may be protected by copyright.

Check out this book on the iBooks Store: https://itun.es/us/jwxmI.l

A

N