English Legal System: Statutory Interpretation Flashcards

1
Q

What is Statutory Interpretation?

A

It considers the ways that judges act on statues made by Parliament.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why do we need Statutory Interpretation?

A

When the meaning of a law is unclear because of…

a broad term which may cover several possible meanings

ambiguity

a drafting error during the Parliamentary law making process.

new developments in technology so old acts may no longer cover a modern day situation

changes in the use of language where the meaning of a word changes over time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the Literal rule?

A

Where judges interpret an act according to its plain, ordinary and literal meaning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are two example case where the literal rule is used?

A

Whitely V Chappel 1868: The defendant was found innocent for impersonating deceased people to use their vote as the statute relating to voting rights required a person to be living in order to be entitled to vote.

Fisher V Bell 1961: The defendant was found not guilty for offering flick knives for sale as goods on display are not “offers”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the golden rule?

A

Where the judge interprets a word or phrase of an act to avoid an absurd conclusion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are two example cases where the golden rule was used?

A

R v Allen 1872: Defendant was found guilty of bigamy as the judge interpreted “to marry” to include the ceremony.

Re Sigsworth 1935: The defendant murdered his mother to inherit her entire estate but the use of the golden rule lead to him being entitled to nothing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the mischief rule?

A

When the judge looks back to the gap in a previous law and interprets the act to cover the gap.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are two example cases where the mischief rule was used?

A

Smith V Hughes 1960: defendants were found guilty under the Street Offences Act 1959 for loitering and soliciting in a public place for the purpose of prostitution.

Elliot V Grey 1960: The defendant was found guilty under the Road Traffic Act 1930 for using an uninsured vehicle on the road.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the advantages of the literal rule?

A

Follows the exact words enacted by Parliament.

Preserves the idea that judges apply the law enacted by parliament.

Respect Parliament supremacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the disadvantages of the literal rule?

A

Doesn’t reflect reality

the words used may have more than one meaning so it may be unclear

a literal interpretation may lead to an absurd conclusion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the advantages of the golden rule?

A

Allows judges to take a sensible approach

Preserves the words used by parliament

Helps the court put in practice what parliament really meant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the disadvantages of the golden rule?

A

Limited in its uses and not used often

Professor Zander calls it a “feeble parachute”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the advantages of the mischief rule?

A

More likely to lead to Justice

Allows judges to look for loopholes

it promotes the purpose of the law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what are the disadvantages of the mischief rule?

A

It may lead to uncertainty

There is a risk of judicial law making.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the purposive approach?

A

when a judge interprets an act to find out its purpose and what parliament intended.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are two example cases where the purposive approach was used?

A

Pepper V Hart 1992: The House of Lords departed from Davis v Johnson and took a purposive approach to interpretation holding that Hansard may be referred to only when the words of the act are ambiguous, obscure or lead to an absurdity. The teacher was not required to pay tax on the perk he received.

R v Secretary of State for Health ex parte Quintavalle 2003: The House of Lords held that the cloned embryos were covered by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990.

17
Q

What are the advantages of the purposive approach?

A

Most likely to lead to justice

Judges have more discretion in ruling

Allows for new developments that parliament could never have foreseen when creating the law for example new technology.

18
Q

What are the disadvantages of the purposive approach?

A

Finding parliament’s intentions isn’t easy

It leads to uncertainty in the law

It allows unelected judges to ‘make laws’ as they are deciding what they think the law should be.

19
Q

What are internal aids?

A

Matters within the statute itself that may help to make its meaning clearer.

20
Q

What are examples of internal aids?

A

The long title of the Act
The preamble
Definition sections in the Act
The short title

21
Q

What are external aids?

A

Matters which are outside the act that can help explain the meaning of an act.

22
Q

What are examples of external aids?

A

Dictionaries
Academic writings
Law Commission Reports
Hansard

23
Q

How did the case Pepper V Hart 1992 effect the use of Hansard?

A

Pepper V Hart 1992: The House of Lords departed from Davis v Johnson and took a purposive approach to interpretation holding that Hansard may be referred to only when the words of the act are ambiguous, obscure or lead to an absurdity. The teacher was not required to pay tax on the perk he received.