Criminal law: Capacity defences Flashcards

1
Q

What is the defence of insanity?

A

Where the defendant must prove that they were labouring under a defect of reason from a disease of the mind.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How can insanity be established ?

A

Applying the principles from
MNoghten 1843 :
> The defendant must suffer from a defect of reason
> The defect of reason must be the result of a disease of the mind
> This must cause the defendant to not know the nature and quality of their act or hat their act was wrong.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who decides whether the defendant is insane?

A

The jury listens to medical evidence and try to understand psychiatric issues.
Where a defendant is found to be insane the verdict is not guilty by reason of insanity?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is a defect of reason?

A

The defendants power of reasoning is impaired eg. in R v Clarke 1972 where it was held that defect of reason must be more than absent mindedness or confusion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is a disease of the mind?

A

A mental or physical disease that affects the mind eg. R v Kemp 1956 where it was held that Kemps understanding had been affected by his condition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

When does the defence of insanity not apply?

A

When the defendant defect of reason is due to external factor such as taking drugs.
Eg. in R v Coley 2018: defendant convicted of attempted murder despite being intoxicated from cannabis during the act.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What happens when the insanity defence is successful?

A

The judge can then impose
>A hospital order - This needs to be imposed for murder charge so the defendant can only be released with the permission of the home secretary
>A supervision order
>An absolute discharge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is automatism?

A

Defined in Bratty (1963) as an act done without control by the mind or by person who is not conscious of what they are doing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is insane automatism?

A

Where the cause of automatism is a disease of the mind (insanity).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is non insane automatism ?

A

Where the cause of a lack of control is external . Where the actus reas of a crime is involuntary due to the automatism the defendant does not have the required mens reas.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is self induced automatism?

A

Where the defendant knows that their conduct is likely to bring on an automatism state.(not available for defence)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What needs to proven for an automatism defence?

A

The act that cause the defendants automatic state was involuntary and due to a external force.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What happens when the automatism defence is successful?

A

Aquttial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is intoxication?

A

Where the defendant must prove that they were intoxicated by drink or a substance so they were unable of forming the mens reas for the offence?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Why is the law on intoxication policy-based?

A

Intoxication is a major factor is the commission of many crime.
To balance the rights of the defendant and the victim. If intoxication were always to be a defence then the victims rights would not be protected.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What does the verdict of intoxication depend on?

A
  • Whether the intoxication was voluntary or involuntary
  • Whether the offence charged is one specific or basic intent.
17
Q

What are specific intent offences?

A
  • Murder
  • S18 OAPA 1861
  • Theft / Robbery
18
Q

What are basic intent offences?

A
  • Manslaughter
  • S20 OAPA 1861
  • S47 OAPA 1861
  • Assault/ Battery
  • Criminal damage
19
Q

What is voluntary intoxicated?

A

When the defendant chooses to take an intoxicating substances they dont form the mens reas of the offence - only be a defence to a specific intent offence.

20
Q

What is involuntary intoxication?

A

When the defendant didnt know they were taking an intoxicatsing substance.

21
Q

What is an example case for voluntary toxication?

A

R v Sheeham and Moore 1995 - Prosecution was unable to prove that the defendants had the mens reas because of their drunken state.
Attorney general for Northern Ireland v Gallgher 1963 - the defendant had the intent to kill before drinking.

22
Q

What is an example case for involuntary intoxication?

A

R v KIngston 1994 - It was that the defendant formed the mens reas for an offence before becoming intoxicated.