enculturation Flashcards

1
Q

aim of martin and haverson

A

To investigate the roles of gender schema on a child’s ability to recall information that was not consistent with their gender schema

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

participants of martin and halverson

A
  • 48 children
  • 24b/24g
  • 5-6yrs
  • Enrolled in local kindergartens
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what type of study is martin and halverson

A
  • experimental
  • independent
  • cross sample
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

procedure of martin and halverson

A
  • Given a SERLI to assess gender stereotyping before the experiment
  • Presented 16 pictures 1 at a time
  • Shown images of kids in role with gender schemas (girl + doll ect) and not in line
  • identify the sex; boy girl woman or man
  • Didn’t know during the time they would have to remember the images
  • 1 week later, they were asked to recall what they had seen using a probed recall technique
  • Asked about 24 pictures, 8 unseen to check for response bias; just guessing or saying they saw it when they didn’t
  • Asked: ‘do you remember seeing a picture of something doing (playing with dolls) in the picture i showed you last week?’
  • remember boy, girl, man, woman or not sure
  • Confidence 1-4
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

results martin and halvseron

A
  • Female pics; consistent actions were remembered more
  • Men pics; inconsistent acts were remembered more
  • For inconsistent pictures; children were more likely to mess up their memory; eg if the girl was holding the hammer in the picture, they remembered it as a man
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

conclusion martin and halverson

A

Indicates that male stereotyping may be stronger
Stereotypes affect encoding and retrieval of information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

strengths martin and halverson

A
  • standardized can be replicated
  • Controlled for response bias by having fake images and the levels of confidence
    -Did not restrict them to answer boy girl they had 5 options
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

weaknesses martin and halverson

A
  • Low ecological validity due to its highly artificial nature
  • The responses found in the SERLI did not align with that of the distortion of memory of the images, therefore the operation os schema, questionable
  • cross sectional is problematic as it doesnt asess the development of schema and effect on behavior
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

aim of hillard and liben

A

How can social category and salience play a role on the development of steryotes and in group behavior for primary school children

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

participants hillard and liben

A

57 us children
3y1m - 5y6m

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

experimntal style hillard and liben

A
  • pre post test
  • experimental
  • feild experiment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

procedure of hillard and liben

A
  • Each child took a test POAT-AM to measure gender flexibility
  • Shown activities and occupations and asked which gender ‘should’ perform it
    22 boy activities
    20 girl activities
    24 neutral activities
  • The number of ‘boths’ was calculated and the lower it was indicated more gender stereotypes
  • Play was observed to see if they played with boys or girls

Schools were allocated to
- High salience; children were made aware of their gender by actions such as separating sexes i need a strong boy ect
- Low salience; no instruction to change behaviours, control group
- the study lasted 2 weeks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

results hillard and liben

A
  • In the pre test levels of boths were similar
  • After 2 weeks the high salience school has a lower number of boths
  • In the low salience group the time playing with the out group, other sex, was not altered
  • In the high salience group the time playing with the out group, other sex, decreased massivley
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

conclusion of hillard and liben

A

The use of enforcing gender differences, mentioning gender and separating gender played a role on the children’s stereotyping levels and even the treatment to other students

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

strengths of hillard and liben

A
  • High ecological validity because it was done in a natural environment, meaning it can be applied to real situations
  • A cause and effect relationship is indicated
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

weaknesses of hillard and liben

A
  • Low internal validity, all variables cannot be strictly controlled, they are less certain
  • Sampling bias the preschool was not free meaning they are middle upper
  • The school had a gender neutrality policy, implying certain standards within the parents making generalizability hard
  • Struggle to assess a child’s salience of the matter
  • Though debriefing occurred, it is dangerous to manipulate such behaviours in children