Effects Of Institutionalisation Flashcards
What are orphan studies good for?
Research into maternal deprivation as a consequence of institutionalisation
Out line Rutgers ERA study
- Followed group of 165 Romanian orphans adopted to Britain to measure what extent good care could make up for poor early experience in an institution
- Physical, cognitive and emotional development assessed betwwen 4-15 years
- British adoptees served as control
What were the cognitive findings of ERA
- When first in UK half showed delayed intellectual development
- At 11
- IQ of those adopted before 6 months was highest around 100 and those after 2 years was lowest around 77
- Differences maintained at 16
What were the attachment findings for ERA
Those adopted after 6 months showed disinhibited attachment, those before 6 months did not
What are the symptoms of disinhibited attachment
- Attention seeking
- Clinginess
- Social behaviour Directed indiscriminately towards both familiar and unfamiliar adults
Outline the procedure of the Bucharest Intervention project
Zeanah et al. (2005)
- Assessed attachment using the strange situation of 95 children aged 1-3 years who had spent most of their lives in institutional care
- Compared to a control group who had never lived in an institution
- Carers also asked about usual social behaviour (signs of disinhibited attachment)
What were the findings of the Bucharest Early intervention Project
- In strange situation control group 75% securely attached compared to 20% of institution group
- 65% disorganised attachment
- 45% disinhibited attachment, control less than 20%
What are the two main effects of institutionalisation
- Disinhibited attachment
2. Mental retardation
What is the cause of disinhibited attachment?
Rutter (2006)
Result of living with multiple caregivers during sensitive period
Describe mental retardation
- In Rutgers study most children showed signs of retardation when arrived in UK
- Those adopted before 6 months caught up by age of 4
Real life application
- Enhanced our understanding of effects of institutionalisation
- Led to improvements in child care in institutions
- Avoid having a large number of care givers and instead just one or two people play a central role, called a key worker
- Gives children a chance to develop normal attachments
Fewer extraneous variables
- Before this study’s into institutions involved children who had experienced loss or trauma before
- So hard to tell if effects due to institution as children dealing with multiple factors that could affect attachment
- Confounding participant variables
- Romain studies don’t have these so higher interval validity
Orphans not typical
- Children had really bad care when it came to forming relationships
- No intellectual stimulation
- Results may not apply to better quality institutional care or just deprivation
- Unusual situational variables means study’s lack generalisability
Ethical/ methodological issues
- ERA children not randomly assigned to conditions
- Didn’t interfere with adoption process meaning those adopted early may have been more sociable ones (confounding variable)
- Bucharest did randomly allocate to other institution or foster care
- Removes confounding variable but unethical