education Flashcards
functionalist perspective of education
macro approach
has four main functions:
value consensus(Durkheim)
linking the family and the wider world(Parsons)
correspondence principle(Schultz)
allocation function(Davis and Moore)
functionalists meritocracy
social rewards allocated by effort and talent rather than because of ascribed status-students who put in more work get higher grades
“talent+motivation+equal opportunity=qualifications and a high position in society”
education creates value consensus
Durkheim- functionalist
education links the family and the wider world(secondary socialisation)
Parsons-functionalist
correspondence principle
Schultz-functionalist
-education develops human capital to build a trained and qualified labour force
allocation function
Davis and Moore-functionalist
-prepare and allocate people for their roles in society based on meritocratic lines
critiques of functionalist view of education
-Marxists argue that the values that are passed on are not shared but are only those of the dominant class and suggest that schools reproduce the inequalities in wider society
-feminists argue that schools pass on patriarchal views
-society is not based on universalistic values-inherited wealth, class, gender, ethnicity affect access to high positions in society
-schooling does not directly lead to employment-employers often complain that schools do not produce well qualified and disciplined workforce’s–>gaps in the labour market
-education is not meritocratic-class,gender,ethnicity can be major barriers
-they exaggerate the role of education-other agents of socialisation have a profound influence
new right thinkers
argue for limiting the role of the state so that schools are run more independently like academies to allow for more parental choice and high standards with focus on exam results–>competition
education reinforces a meritocratic system-The New Right
Chubb and Moe
education is part of the Ideological State Apparatus which passes on ideology which justifies capatalism
Althusser-neo marxist
culture of education is the culture of the dominant class
Bourdieu-marxist
school prepares people for work through the hidden curriculum
Bowles and Gintis-marxist
critiques of Marxism
-they incorrectly assume people are passive victims-exaggerates the extent to which the working class are socialised into obedience
-pupils can always rebel-not the passive conformists that Marxists say they are eg Willis
-exaggerate the role of education-other agents of socialisation have a big impact
parents socialise children which contributes to gendered subject choices
Oakley-feminist
girls who participated it sport were negatively labelled as lesbians and subject and career counselling tended to recommend gendered careers
Dewar-feminist
gendered subject bias has been seen to impact literacy and reading as well
Elwood-feminist
gendered subject choices
Skelton-feminist
critiques of vocational education
-lower quality
-boring and repetitive with poor skill development
-qualifications held in less esteem-little practical value in securing employment
-vocational workers used as cheap labour
-they often fail in their objective of preparing young people for the working world
school ethos and hidden curriculum
(factors effecting educational achievement)
the school ethos is the things that make up the particular character of the school and is often reflected in the hidden curriculum
the halo effect
stereotypes held by teachers can lead to this-assumes that good behaviour =higher ability, and bad behaviour =lower ability
ideal pupil and pivotal identity and labelling
Becker and Waterhouse
the ideal pupil identity is known by students who share a similar stereotype for what the “ideal learner” is
Hempel-Jorgenson
students were given labels based on ethnicity
(outcomes of labelling)
Gillborn and Youdell-certain ethnicities garnered lower expectations from teachers. Black pupils were more severely punished- they internalised the negative label which effected their behaviour.
investigated the effect of self fulfilling prophecies
(outcomes of labelling)
Rosenthal and Jacobson-they found that pupils bring their self and behaviour into line with teacher stereotypes and expectations. Working class and black boys most negatively effected. Most positive effect on middle-class and girls(especially Indian Asian girls)