Ecological Impacts Part 2 Flashcards
Direct Killing and Injuring:
- There are ____ and other ____ issues regarding the morality of killing animals. What are the points that follow with this statement?(5)
- ethical
- philosophical
1. Animals often not killed immediately
2. What if they have young?
3. Do fish feel pain?
Direct Killing and Injuring:
- Does it effect the enjoyment of other wildlife tourists? How? (3)
- Yes
1. Changes the population structure
2. Taking big trophy animals
3. Non-target species killed
Direct Killing and Injuring:
- What are some OTHER issues given in lecture?
- uncontrolled shell collecting: effects are unknown…we are all probably guilty!
- trampling by tourists : corals, plover chicks (lay in the sand)
- Killing for safety reasons (snakes)
- Insecticide use ( spraying for tourists)
Habitat Alteration:
-What causes vegetation changes?
- clearing
- modification (different trees and shrubs): As a result, can reduce prey for many animals such as birds, frogs and small mammals. ***plants placed there for decoration etc i.e. not normally in that habitat
- Soil compactions and taking of firewood.
- off road vehicle damage (trail bikes and four wheelers)
- human feet also
- horse back riding
- clearing for road construction
* *first road opened up can cause a ripple effect for my to be built.
Habitat Alteration:
- What are some other key points?
- feeding by tourists
- stealing of food by animals
- manipulation of habitat to provide food to tourists
- garbage (generated by tourists)
L> ex: garbage dump that bears go in and scavenge !
Habitat Alteration:
- What are the issues with feeding? (6)
- feeding of inappropriate food (loss of nutrients that they would normally get in their natural diet)
- Habituation
- Health issues
- Attraction of dangerous animals (dangerous predators that are curious)
- Unbalance ecosystems
L> cumulation of a certain species etc displacing other species - Accidents to animals (such as dolphins and boats)
Habitat Alteration:
- Why do people feed wildlife?(2)
L> what question does this pose onto tourists?
- Desire of the tourists to have contact with or close up viewing of the animal (photographers are the WORST for this)
- For predictable viewing of wildlife
- non-consumptive use of wildlife requires a predictable occurrence within a small spatial area.
- Would most tourists rather see wild animals behaving naturally or half domesticated animals gathering for a handout?
Habitat Alteration:
- Feeding:
L> We need to ask what? (5)
- What are the major concerns for those who oppose?
- Are there situations in which feeding is beneficial?
- What information exists to establish concerns are valid?
- Would it ever be possible to educate the majority of people to refrain from feeding?
- Can the majority be educated that in some situations it is okay, in others it is not?
Habitat Alteration:
- Feeding:
L> What are the consequences if we stop?
- not stocking up on food for later use L> for hibernation etc - forget how to hunt - forget to migrate - forget to mate - change hours of foraging? L> think stingray city
Habitat Alteration:
- Feeding:
L> Give a summary for the argument people provide for pro feeding wildlife! (8)
- may help in lean times
- lessen mortality
- teaches positive attitude —domestication
- easier to educate people
- deep seated need
- photographic opportunities
- animals are unpredictable (habituation causes them to become more predictable)
- Missed opportunities (ensures you will see them)
Habitat Alteration:
- Feeding:
L> Give a summary for the argument people provide for being against feeding wildlife! (7)
- Population may decrease
- population may increase : may increase a different species
- population may do either! : may keep the population even which = death
- habituate
- undesirable behaviour
- undesirable behaviour towards tourists
- no longer ‘wild’