EBM Flashcards
Systematic revue
overview of particular clinical research question
Meta-analysis (3 points)
Uses statistical method to summarise studies, often included in a systematic review, produces single quantitative result
Single quantitative result
pooled treatment result / overall effect estimate
Forest plot
graphical result of meta-analysis
Point effect estimate (forest plot)
vertical midpoint of each square, mean treatment effect for that study
forest plot vertical line
line of no effect
horizontal line (each) on forest plot
confidence interval
if horizontal line (confidence interval) crosses vertical line (line of no effect) then..
No significant difference between two treatments
width of diamond at bottom of forest plot
certainty of overall affect estimate - 95% confidence interval
confidence interval
range of values within which the true mean of whole population is expected to lie
95% confidence interval
95% confident that true mean lies somewhere between two limits of interval
larger sample sizes lead to CIs which are
narrower
less variability leads to CIs which are
narrower
a larger confidence level results in CIs which are
broader
outcome variable
dependent variable
outcome variable of meta analysis
often odds ratio (NOT ALWAYS)
in a meta analysis where the mean difference is zero
no difference between groups
negative mean difference in meta analysis
favours treatment
positive mean difference in meta analysis
favours control (treatment harmful compared to no treatment)
relative frequency
percentage of total number in sample