Diversification Flashcards

1
Q

Why Diversify (be in many different businesses)?

A
  1. Economies of Scale And Scope
  2. Market Power
  3. Superior internal Financial Structures
  4. Risk Reduction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Economies of Scale and Scope from diversification

A

due to shared activities and competencies, it creates synergies by eliminating duplicate resources and shares information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Example of Economies of Scale and Scope

A

Disney: the businesses rely on product extensions, synergies in the brand, and synergies in management and leadership

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why should an animation company own an amusement park?

A

This levels out the revenue streams - movies don’t always work out but then can create rides off of them and keep the brand alive and have a retail branch

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Market Power from diversification

A

This strengthens bargaining power, leverages strengths, and reduces rivalry

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

risk reduction from diversification

A

(Kay, 1997)
unrelatedness of a conglomerate is an advantage in dealing with unforeseeable risks and can reduce risks for employees and managers .. but this does nothing for value creation for investors - they diversify by investing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

example of risk reduction through diversification

A

diversification can stabilize cashflows and avoid cyclical fluctuations as was the case with Rossignol: as a ski brand, Rossignol bought Time a french bike brand in 2016 and Felt Bike, a US Firm in 2017 for seasonal balance off piste as climate change brought challenges to their 2014/15 ski seasons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Issues

A

Bureaucracy, managerial Influence, cross-subsidization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Issue Bureacracy

A

size requires standardization, but may neutralize synergies (Porter 1985) which can be a central advantage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

issue of managerial influence

A

management might be spending time on politics rather than management
and skills are not always perfectly transferable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

cross-subsidization issue

A

loss making areas can drain from profit-making areas which is the opposite of the point of diversification, which is to capitalize on synergies and complementary resources

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Potential consequence: trading at a discount

A

(Berger& Ofek, 1995) diversified firms trade at a discount compared to undiversified firms at an estimated amount of 13-15% probably due to cross-subsidization and overinvestment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Issues with studying it

A

Endogeneity (whether a firm diversifies is not independent of past performance)
under sampling of failure & causality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Dominant Logic Approach

A

Prahalad & Beltis 1986
Pick a diversification strategy that fits with the firm’s dominant strategy
(strategically similar businesses need a single dominant logic, while diversification with strategic variety requires multiple dominant logic)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Related v unrelated diversification

A

related is better (Rumelt) because it is harder to maximize value without synergies or market power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Synergies through diversification

A

porter (1985) they satisfy the better off test

Gold & Lusch 1993 say to diversify if there is a resource fit meaning they are either related or complementary

17
Q

Support for Related Diversification

A

this is the modern thinking .. Markides (1992) showed that firms react positively when unrelated business are trimmed and there is a focus on synergies

18
Q

1960s/70s thinking

A

Gold & Lusch 1993
firms viewed diversification as portfolio planning and 45% of fortune 500 companies used frameworks to manage diversified businesses but they were too complex to handle

19
Q

1980s frameworks

A

return to rationalization: mintzberg began criticizing and emphasizing building resource based competitive advantages
nokia went from paper, tires forestry, and telecom to focusing on telecom

20
Q

modern focus on core competencies

A

building invisible assets
LMVH: distinct capability is managing luxury brands (more than 40) - market analysis, promotion, retail management and quality assurance