disabled identities Flashcards
medical model of disability
this view sees disability as a personal tragedy and the disabled deserve our pity
disabled are dependent on able-bodies and are unable to function without them
labels disabled people as ‘inferior’ as it is deemed abnormal to be disabled and normalisation will only occur through a cure
medical model - best
traditionally disability was seen in terms of a person’s ability to fully participate in activities that the rest take for granted eg washing ourselves, cleaning a floor, walking, driving
social model of disability
since 1980s - medical model began to change with the rise of the social model
this view was developed by disabled people themselves and argued that biological disability was less important than social disability
oliver - social model of disability
it is society which disables physically impaired people
this is because the disabled are excluded from full participation in society through stereotypical attitudes held by able-bodies people
best - social model
society generates forms of discrimination and exclusion that disabled have to cope with
the problem is to be found in social constructions of prejudice that surrounds disability and not in the bodies of disabled people
marxist views on disability
it is difficult for disabled people to construct positive identities because they are often unable to work - particularly in high-status jobs, and so are not valued as highly in a capitalist society that values people entirely in terms of their wealth and employment
feminist views on disability
it is difficult for disabled women to construct positive identities because they are not viewed as sexually attractive and are often unable to become mothers, the two main routes to status for women in a patriarchal society
feminist view evaluation
interactionists argue that marxists and feminists view the disabled as passive
for instance, Goffman’s third strategy of becoming involved in identity politics suggests that disabled people are able to construct resistant identities
interactionists views
disability is a social construct - it is a label applied to a group of people who are defined by society in a particular way
stigma is internalised as disabled people come to see themselves as others see them
what does goffman argue - interactionist
disability is a stigmatised identity
it happens through a number of mechanisms
- derogatory names
- media images
- differential medical treatment
- barriers in employment
- constructed depedency
what does Scott argue - interactionist
study into blind people in the US found that they internalise the experts’ view of themselves and so develop a ‘blind personality’
as part of this they developed learned helplessness
how do interactionists argue about managing stigmatised identities
try to hide the stigma (easier with less visible impairments)
admit the stigma and try to relieve the tension that arises in interactions
protests against the stigma (identity politics)
postmodernist view
disabled people are free to express themselves in many more ways than in the past due to new technology eg able-bodies avatar of woman with MS on Second Life
postmodernist view criticism
structural theorists would argue that postmodernists fail to acknowledge the significant impact of structural inequalities on the identities of disabled people, for which new technology is unable to compensate
disability as a social construct
most of the uk population have some form of impairment, such as wearing glasses
however, people with these are not labelled as ‘disabled’ because society does not define these as a problem and therefore does not produce a social environment in which people who wear glasses are handicapped
people who use wheelchairs are handicapped by society’s failure to provide a social environment in which they can be as mobile as able-bodies people
concept of independence
being an aspect of normality is seen critically by sociologists in the disability movement
the reason for this is that the negative social reaction of disabled people is because they are dependent and constantly in need of help
what does marsh and keating argue
no one is independent
“in modern societies, we are, of course, interdependent: we cannot manage to feed and clothe ourselves without relying on a vast network of other people and organisations
marxism - pre-industrial society
the view that able-bodies and disabled people should be segregated and treated differently did not exist
marxism - finkelstein
our negative cultural attitudes towards the disabled may be the product of capitalism’s emphasis on work as a source of identity, status and power
marxism - industrialisation
industrialisation was responsible for a dramatic shift in cultural attitudes because capitalist society requires a fit and healthy workforce to generate profits for the capitalist class
disabled people become an economic burden for society and are defined as abnormal and as a social problem
watson - learned helplessness
our stereotypical perceptions of disabled people about dependency and helplessness can affect how disabled people actually perceives themselves and their abilities
this is known as the ‘self-fulfilling prophecy’ whereby disabled people begin to believe that they are helpless which then leads to low self-esteem and worth
scott - self-fulfilling prophecy
looked at interactions between medical professionals and blind people in USA
argued that the blind developed a ‘blind personality’ because they internalised the experts’ view that they should be experiencing psychological problems in adjusting to their loss of sight
- learned helplessness
longmore
disabled people are represented on TV as monsters, dependent on others, objects of pity
if the disabled are portrayed as courageous, it is often because it is contrasted with the tragedy of their situation
these stereotypes reinforce cultural stereotypes and consequently prejudice and discrimination
cumberbatch and negrine
media representations of disabled rarely present them as a person, an individual who happens to also have a disability
they tend to focus on disability rather than representing them as individuals who happen to have a disability