Differential 3.2 and 3.3 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are Turkheimer’s (2000) ‘Three laws of behaviour genetics’?

A
  • All human behavioural traits are heritable
  • Shared environmental influences tend to be
    weaker than genetic influences
  • Neither accounts for all the variance
    (Non-shared environmental influences matter too, Psychology measures always contain error)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are five implications of Turkheimer’s (2000) ‘Three laws of behaviour genetics’?

A
  • Can’t assume correlations between
    life circumstances and later outcomes are
    causal
  • Family environments make us different as much as similar
  • Environmental influences are idiosyncratic
    (They transact with our genes in individual ways + there are very few direct main effects out there)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What three types of Mendelian medical conditions has genome technology caused spectacular breakthroughs for?

A

Huntington’s Disease
Phenylketonuria
Specific Intellectual disabilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the fourth ‘law’ of behavioural genetics (Chabris et al., 2015)?

A

Typical human trait is associated with very many genetic variants, each accounting for miniscule amounts of variance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the definition of intelligence?

A

An individual’s mental ability to act purposefully, think rationally, and deal effectively with the environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How is intelligence measured? (10 points)

A
  • Vocabulary
  • Relations among words
  • Identifying sequences
  • Short-term and working memory (lists, keeping track of one thing while doing another)
  • Speed of simple processing (identifying symbols, reaction times)
  • Ability to visualise transformation of shapes
  • IQ
  • Brain volume
  • Speed of neural transmission
  • Working memory capacity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the problems with methods of measurement for intelligence?

A
  • Intimidating situations - questions posed by trained assessors, paper-pencil presentations, computer presentations
  • Those with less confidence likely to be more intimidated - too much stress hinders performance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the benefits of measurements of intelligence?

A

They predict:
– Educational achievement and attainment
– Job performance
– Attained social class and socioeconomic status
– Income and financial resources
– Health
– Unemployment, divorce, out-of-wedlock birth,
incarceration, public benefit receipt, school dropout

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the ‘drop in from the sky’ (Hunt, 2011) method of measuring intelligence? (1 sentence)

A

An examiner poses a set of questions to the examinee, out of context of the examinee’s normal life, and in a limited time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the drawbacks of the ‘drop in from the sky’ method of measuring intelligence? (3 points)

A
  • No time for participant to evaluate, ponder
  • Artifical, limited context
  • Inevitably dependent on prior experience with related material (school, culture, social class)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What behaviours do ‘drop in from the sky’ tests fail to measure? (7 behaviours)

A
  • Ability to understand others’ perspectives
  • Creativity
  • Ability to carry out practical tasks
  • Self insight
  • Decision-making quality
  • Wisdom
  • Depth of understanding
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was Raymond Cattell’s (1971)investment theory about? (2 points)

A
  • humans have biologically fixed but ‘fluid’ cognitive capacities that can be applied in any direction
  • investing capacity in acquiring knowledge and skills become fixed: ‘crystallized’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is ‘fluid intelligence’ and how is it measured? (1 sentence each)

A

The biologically limited capacity for processing information
Figural tests

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is ‘crystallized intelligence’ and how is it measured? (1 sentence each)

A

The accuracy and amount of information available for processing perceptions
Verbal tests

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the definition of personality? (1 sentence)

A

An individual’s characteristic style of behaving, thinking, and feeling affected by the development of an individual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How is personality measured? (2 points)

A

Personality inventories
- self-reports/reports of close others of how well presented statements/adjectives apply

Projective techniques
- free-form reactions/responses to stimuli/situations to reveal emotions/internal conflicts

17
Q

How good are measures of personality such as self-reports and responses to stimuli? (few points for inventory, 1 for projective-test)

A

Inventory:
- many items implicitly reflect social desirability
- people can fake good
- lack of self-insight
- subjective interpretation of questions
- close others cannot see targets in all situations

Projective test responses:
- interpretations are highly subjective, speculative

18
Q

What do personality scale scores tell us? (2 points)

A
  • reflect personality ‘traits’ (tendencies to behave consistently in biologically coherent ways)
  • generate descriptions of behavioural generalities, motivations vary
    (varies with situations and circumstances)
19
Q

What were the 5 stages of studies starting in 1936 that led to the Five-Factor Model in 1985?

A
  • Allport and Odbert (1936) started ‘lexical hypothesis’ dynasty: selected 4,504 adjectives describing people
  • Cattell whittled down to 171, factor-analysed to 16
  • Tubes and Christal (1961) claimed only 5 were relevant
  • Goldberg, Digman et al (1980) reviewed models, concluded Tubes and Christal model = best
  • Costa and McCrae (1985) based Five-Factor NEO on Tubes and Christal model
20
Q

What are the Five Factor Model (Costa and McCrae, 1985) Traits OCEAN and what do they show overall?

A

Behavioural descriptions / not adjectives
Articulated personality theory

  • Openness to experience (art, culture, curiosity, imagination)
  • Conscientiousness (self-discipline, impulses, orderliness, responsibility)
  • Extraversion (breadth of activities, engagement with world, socialising, enthusiasm, assertiveness)
  • Agreeableness (social harmony, optimism, considerate, kind, generous)
  • Neuroticism (tendency to anger, worry, emotionally reactive, vulnerable to stress)
21
Q

What is the Five-Factor Theory (Costa and McCrae, 1985)? (5 points)

A
  • Five independent traits
  • Biological contributions are stable after age 30
  • Traits exert causal influences on behaviour / environment causes short-term variance
  • Seeds of traits present from birth
  • Model can incorporate all aspects of personality if we construct hierarchy of measurement detail
22
Q

What is missing from the Five-Factory Model? (6 points)

A
  • Anti-social behaviours e.g aggression, manipulation, cruelty, greed
  • Social dominance, competitiveness, ambition (risk-taking, thrill-seeking)
  • Morality, spirituality, religosity
  • Enjoyment of solitude
  • Distinction between positive / negative emotion
  • Psychopathology
23
Q

What ‘grounds’ can we accept the Five Factor Model on? (3 points)

A
  • Factor analysis supports five = right number
  • ## Similar statistics in samples with wide ranges of ages, cultures languages
24
Q

What are the main issues with the Five Factor Model? (4 points)

A

Derived without underlying theory
Derived using subjective methods
Saturated with social desirability
Has broad trait definitions = lack of consensus

25
Q

What has the Five Factor Model predicted in outcomes? (4 points) And how does it compare to intelligence? (1 point)

A
  • High Neuroticism + low Agreeableness = psychopathology
  • High Conscientiousness, Openness and low Neuroticism = educational achievement + attainment + work performance
  • Low Agreeableness = higher income
  • High Conscientiousness = health

BUT correlations are lower than those with
intelligence