Democracy and Participation Flashcards
In 1974 what was Winston Churchill famous quote about democracy
“Democracy is the worst form of government except for those other forms”
What does this quote tell us about Churchill
that he understands that the way deocracy roots power in the people makes it the best form of government available because the people hold their government to account for what it does on their behalf and so choose the politician they want to represent them
Why is it a democratic government can claim legitamacy
because they govern with the consent of the people
What wider obligation does this place on the public
to obey the law because it reflects the wishes of society
What is an autocratic government
power is permanently given to one person or group and they have ultimate power
How does an autocratic government rule
by force not consent and therefore can not claim legitamacy
UK has a good claim to having longest history of democracy when was the start of the move towards full democracy
1215 Magna Carta but may go back to Anglo Saxon times
Name 2 types of democracy in UK
1 representative democracy
2 direct democracy
What happens in a representitive democracy
1 voters elect politicians to make decisions on their behalf
2 politicians are made accountable to public in regular elections
3 elected politicians represent the interest of their constituencies - listening to the concerns of the people in the meetings and surgeries
What is the job of a politician
to gain political understanding and make informed decisions in the interest of the nation - there are so many decisions to make that the public just doesn’t have the time to vote on all of them
What is not the job of the politician
to carry out the will of others but according to their best judgement not just voters witches
How are the governments of the Uk made up
Westminster Parliament has 650 MPs accountable to their constituents in regular elections
Scotland Wales and Northern Ireland have their own devolved governments who legislate on domestic affairs
Elected mayors and local councils also represent the public
Who do lobbyists represent
the interests of a particular group or cause and they try to influence politicians
What are the advantages of representative democracy
1 government is carried out by professional politicians who are required to be well informed about political issue
2 politicians are more likely to make dedicated decisions than most members of the public who maybe influenced by emotion and who may not understand the complexities
3 elected politicians balance conflicts of interest - this protects the rights of all especially minorities
4 there are regular elections for voters to decide to reflect their representative or nit
what are the disadvantages if a representitive democracy
1 mps represent the elite and the more traditional values of the population, they are disengaged and do not adequately represent their interests
2 MPs can have outside interests including second jobs which can create conflict of interest
3claimed that parliament is unrepresentative because it is elected first past the post FPTP San as a result conserviative and labour parties dominate the House of Commons and smaller parties lib dem and green struggle
4 House of Lords is unelected and not accountable to the public so further unrepresentative. Social makeup of parilianebt is mainly white, middle class males
Describe direct democracy in the UK
Decisions are directly made by the public,
Name and describe examples of direct democracy state advantages and disadvantage
1 referendums- enable public to express views on single issue 2014 Scottish Parliament referendum
Advantages
1 gives public a direct choice
2 helps to settle controversial issues
3 because it is a public vote result can claim legitimacy
Disadvantages
critics say public do not have a detailed understanding of the issues
2 they do resolve issues
2 Electronic Petitions - if petitions on a government website reaches over 100,000 signatures it will be considered for debate in either Westminster or Commons
Advantages
1 they engage with issues public feel strongly about but doesn’t mean legislation will follow
2 famous people can generate interest eg Marcus Rashford
Disadvantages
1 can raise false expectations and waste parliament time is it is an issue can’t legislate on eg revoke Tony Blairs knighthood
3Consultative exercises- set up when governing bodies want to gauge a reaction to proposed policy eg expansion of HS2
Advantages - a way to engage public on issues that effect them
Disadvantage s -
1 only a consultation and not binding
2 socially disadvantaged do not engage so outcomes are up representative
4 open Primaries - public decide who the candidate should be
Advantage
1 public influence eho candidates for office can be
Disadvantage
1 people not closely affiliated to with a political party are likely to enter politics
5 Election of the leadership of political parties - all parties allow their members to decide who the leader of the party will be
Advantages
1 makes the leadership accountable to the whole party
Disadvantages
1 it gives to much power to party activists who are usually more radical than the electorate
6 Recall of MPs Act - if an MP has been imprisoned or suspended form the commons recall petition sighted by 10% of their constituents can trigger a by election
Advantages
Power of recall makes MPs accountable to constituents for their misconduct
Disadvantages
The circumstances in which it can be activated are so extreme it’s impact is very little
List the advantages of direct democracy
1 engages the public and makes
politicians more responsive to what people think so creates a closer connection between public and political decisions
2 giving the public opportunities to make decisions creates engagement in political process encourages a more politically educated citizens
3 our representitive s are kept informed about developing public attitudes
List the disadvantages of direct democracy
1 referendums simplify questions to yes and no when issues are more complex eg EU referendum
2 can challenge the Burkean principle that representatives should act according to their conscience not constituency wishes eg T May supported remain but led a party committed to leaving
3 doesn’t balance conflicting interests of balance the rights of minorities
4 encourages the public to vote on issues they have little knowledge on
Why is the belief that a failure to engage in politics means that the public are so content with politics that they do not see a need to engage
because this argument suggest that politicians should try to encourage no public engagement in politics and this would be the end of participatory democracy
Identify 2 occasions when behaviour of MPs has resulted in loss of public trust
2009 allegations MPs were overclaiming expenses
2010 former labour minister Stephen Byers was secretly filmed telling a consultancy firm
“He was like a cab for hire”
What is the impact of this loss of trust
Damages Westminster’s reputation
2 fuels voter disengagement
2021 poll 80% believed there was significant corruption in uk politics
Voter turnout decreases especially from marginalized social groups
Why does uk democracy need reform
To reinspire enthusiasm for the democratic process
Needs to be made more relevant to the public
Due to low voting trends legitamacy of elected politicians is reduced
What does legitamacy mean
Power has been legally acquired and exercised according to the rule of law
Name and describe ways in which participation could be increased
1 public referendums - currently called by the government when they feel people need to legitamise an important decision. In Republic of Ireland any proposed constitutional change has to go through public referendum eg legalization of abortion and same sex marriage
Model can lead to democratic overload
2 electronic petitions- enables public to raise issues they believe need resolving. Some believe they should automatically trigger a paliamentary vote. But this will bog parliament down and stop debate of other issues
3 Power to recall - enabling voters to trigger a bi election
Critics say it could be used by opposition for political advantage and Parliament could be deprived of independent thinking MPs and replaced by mouthpieces of their constituents . Undermining the reputation and authority of Parliament
4Further devolution - more power devolved from Westminster giving greater self determination. Scottish and welsh parliaments and elected mayors show how decision making can be brought closer to the public - but turnout for these elections shows they are not effective in energising political involvement
5 House of Lords reforms
Members currently unelected and unaccountable, claims that it encourages politely cronyism
Making it an elected chamber would make Westminster fully democratically accountable but there is potential of creating rivalry with commons and creating constitutional gridlock - difficult to see how as turnout is currently low by introducing another elected chamber will increase it.
6 Digital democracy
Supports believe its introduction would facilitate voting but
A voting on your mobile would encourage more voting but also voting would not be carried out in sector and voting manipulation would increase
B Allegations of cyber interference by Russia suggests electronic voting is more open to fraud
C The way political activists use social media can encourage sloganeering and not informed political discussion
D standard of debate on social media indicates activists and politicians can use this to bully and engage considered debate
E Banning of Trump from twitter in 21 raises the question should media companies be allowed to decide who is allowed on their social media platforms
7 Reform of Westminster electoral system, claimed that FPTP discourages voting because it limits voter choice by over rewarding conservative and labour parties making it more difficult for other parties to gain representation
Replacing FPTP with a proportional form of election would create a fairer connection between votes a party receives and its representation - wasted votes and safe seats would be eliminated and votes would carry more weight and voters would have a greater inventive to vote
8 Compulsory voting
To improve government legitimacy 16 nations enforce compulsory voting ( 1 is NK and only 1 name on the ballot)
Supporters argue it would address decreasing turnout in UK - it would force voters to engage with their civic responsibility and encourage a more politically educated population
But critics say it gives the state to much power to coerce citizens - that the decision not to engage in voting is a powerful political statement of disapproval.
Forcing people to vote does not address reasons why people do not vote and although more people will vote doesn’t mean they will be well informed. May even reduce population enthusiasm as seen as oppressive.
Should voting be made compulsory
Yes
1 it is a civic responsibility like jury service
2 Limited numbers of voting can undermine legitimacy of results
3 Those not voting are often from poorest groups and the young so decisions favour wealthy and older. It would ensure politics responded to the opinions of all
4 It doesn’t force people to chose they can spoil their paper if no candidate appeals
5 can have an educative role as people may be more likely to inform themselves of the choices open to them
No
1 public have the right to chose whether or not to vote. It is the job of the politicians to generate enthusiasm and compulsory voting may remove the incentive for politicians to engage with the public
2 votes of politically disengaged will carry less weight than the votes of those who take civil responsibilities seriously
3 compulsory voting is based on coercion which is alien to British politics. Voting is a civic right not a duty
4 the states extension of power over individuals should be resisted as it limits our power to act in the way we want
5 not voting can be a positive decision to show dissatisfaction with the candidate or process