David Hume Flashcards
David Hume basics
Scottish (1711-1776)
- A treatise of human nature (-> psych as a basis of all other sciences)
- wanted to experiment into philosophy
- limits of human knowledge
David Hume, perceptions
- Impressions = perceptions (ideas are less vivid copies of perceptions)
- ideas: structured like impressions
- simple and complex perceptions, simple engage with each other
- everything builds on perception
- impressions are more important cuz they build on reality
- complex perception-> broken down (ATOMISTIC)
- POSITIVIST: all meaningful thoughts-> broken down to observable
3 types, David Hume
Similarity, space and time contingency, causal connection
- association: newton gravity
- generalization: inductive connection of experience
- causality perception of co-occurance. HABITUATION instead of apprehension
Where do we end up if we are consistently empirical (Hume)
- never experience causality
- science needs to handle causal relationships
- assuming causality makes no sense, even though it works
- we don’t experience shape consistency, only jumbled impressions
- Less rational beings than we thought (HUME)
- ability of generalization is innate and more useful than thinking (HUME)
- fundament of knowledge is habit (HUME€
Humes fork
Two categories for knowdlege: relations of ideas (logical truths, maths) and matters of fact (empirical truths)
-> Darwin’s and Einsteins empiricism came from Hume
Induction, deduction, abduction
Induction (bottom-up reasoning)
- all known life forms need water to survive-> all life forms need water to survive
Deduction (top-down reasoning)
- all humans are mortal
- Socrates is a human
- => Socrates is mortal
Abduction
- when it rains grass is wet, when the grass is wet it’s plausible that it rained
-> science doesn’t use induction explicitly, based on it only.
Hume: problem of indiction
- no reason to believe induction (= general reasoning [sun will come up cuz it did every day before] is only a habit, no logical necessity)
- We generalize from observing
- Recurring events will happen like they did in the past-> the principle of infirmity of nature (will only be SIMILAR)
Problems: we can’t really predict anything
- induction is a psych tendency, we would live without it too
Anti-induction
- I have lost 10 times so I must win this time.
But: I have always burnt my hand in a fire, so they won’t burn next time?
Bernard Russel’s chicken
- sun comes up every day, farmer brings breakfast every morning => chicken thinks the farmer is a nice person due to breakfast every morning. How sure can it be?
Responses to Hume
- metaphysicians: even that disproves empiricism since it proves knowledge can be acquired through other means than experience
- Karl popper: Hume is right but it doesn’t matter