Cupboard Love (Attachment) Flashcards

1
Q

Dollard and Miller 1950

A

caregiver as a provider of food. Do we learn to love whoever feeds us?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Attachment and classical conditioning

A

According to learning theory, the baby has to learn to form an attachment with his/her primary caregiver

By the process of classical conditioning, the baby forms an association between the primary caregiver (a neutral stimulus) and the feeling of pleasure that comes from being fed (an innate, unconditioned response).

At first, the baby simply feels comforted by food. However, each time he/she is fed, the primary caregiver is there too. He/she quickly associates the primary caregiver with the pleasure of being fed.

Before long, the primary caregiver stimulates a feeling of pleasure on her own, even without food.

This means the baby feels [happier] when the primary caregiver is near. It is the beginning of [attachment]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Operant conditioning for infants

A

Babies cry for comfort, this builds attachment because it leads to a response from the caregiver. If the correct response is given, crying is reinforced. The caregiver response is comforting the ‘social supressor’ behaviour. It is a two-way process, the baby is reinforced and the caregiver receives negative reinforcement because the baby stops crying.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The drive reduction theory

A

suggests that hunger (drive) makes the infant feel uncomfortable, and prompts a behaviour (crying) to reduce the discomfort.

Food reduces the discomfort and is therefore rewarding via negative reinforcement.

This ‘stamps in’ the feeding behaviour, food is the primary reinforcer because it supplies rewards.

The person who supplies the food becomes associated (secondary reinforcer) resulting in the infant becoming attached to the person as they become a source of reward in his/her own right.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

(Evaluation of Cupboard Love) Counter evidence from animal research

A

Lorenz’s geese imprinted before they were fed and maintained this attachment despite who fed them.
Harlow’s monkeys preferred the cloth mother over the wire mother with food.
In humans, food does not create the attachment bond. We also attach for physical comfort, safety and warmth.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

(Evaluation of Cupboard Love) Counter evidence from human research

A

Schaffer and Emerson 1964, many of the babies developed a primary attachment to their biological mother even though other care givers fed them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

(Evaluation of Cupboard Love) Learning theory ignores other factors

A

reciprocity and interactional synchrony is ignored by the learning theory. Good quality attachment was shown when infants’ were responded to and signals were picked up.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

(Evaluation of Cupboard Love) Some elements of conditioning could be involved, despite other evidence

A

Many areas of human development are affected by conditioning. The attachment is not necessarily about food, but the reinforcement between primary caregiver and provision of comfort and social interaction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

(Evaluation of Cupboard Love) A newer learning theory explanation

A

Hay and Vespo 1988- social learning theory. The theory suggests that parents teach children to love them through modelling and imitation of behaviour. For example, hugging or interactions such as ‘that’s a lovely smile/hug’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Evolution

A

the process whereby useful features are introduced into a species. Features are useful if they help the animals to survive long enough to successfully reproduce. To survive and reproduce, animals need to be well adapted to their environment.
Useful features are called adaptive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Bowlby’s Monotropic Attachment Theory

A

According to Bowlby, attachment is a behaviour that has evolved because of its survival value
An evolutionary trait is always genetically transmitted so children are born with a drive to become attached to a care giver. It is innate.

It has a number of parts which can be broken down into the following:
-adaptivity
-monotropy
-sensitive period
-social releasers
-internal working model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Adaptive

A

attachments give our species an adaptive advantage, making us more likely to survive. This is because if an infant has an attachment to a caregiver, they are kept safe, give food and kept warm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Monotropy (includes law of continuity+Law of accumulated separation)

A

generally the attachment to the mother. This is special and intense, mono meaning one. If the mother isn’t available, the infant could bond with another ever-present adult, mother-substitute.
-the law of continuity stated that the more constant and predictable a child’s care, the better the quality of their attachment.
-the law of accumulated separation stated that the effects of every separation from the mother ass up ‘and the safest does is therefore a zero dose’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Sensitive period

A

(3-6 months) babies should develop attachment with their caregiver during this time. As the months pass it becomes increasingly difficult to form attachments between the caregiver and the infant.

The infant has a critical period (2-2.5years) when the infant attachment system is active. If the child fails to form an attachment this critical period they could be damaged for life- socially, emotionally, intellectually and physically.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Social releasers

A

these unlock the innate tendency of adults to care for them. It provides protection and enhances survival. These are both: physical (baby face features and body proporions) and behavioural (crying and cooing). A parent satisfying the needs of a baby with the intention of stopping them from crying is negative reinforcement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Internal working model

A

internal working model: with monotropic attachment the infant would form an internal working model. This is a special model for relationships and has several consequences.
-Short term: child given insight into the caregiver’s behaviour and enables the child to influence the caregiver’s behaviour, so that a partnership can be formed.
-Long term: it acts as a template for all future relationships because it generates expectations about what an intimate, loving friendships are like.
IWM affects the child’s ability as a parent later.

17
Q

(IWM)The continuity hypothesis

A

The continuity hypothesis proposes that infants who are strongly attached will continue to be socially and emotionally competent in their adult relationships. Whereas infants who aren’t strongly attached have more social and emotional difficulties in future adult relationships.

18
Q

(Evaluations for monotropy) Schaffer and Emerson 1964

A

-monotropy doesn’t happen in all infants
-Schaffer and Emerson found that a significant minority of infants formed multiple attachments at the same time.
-Suess et al 1992 have shown that attachment to the mother is more important in predicting later behaviour.

19
Q

(Evaluations for monotropy) Support for social releasers

A

Brazleton et al 1975 observed mothers and babies during their interactions, reporting the existence of interactional synchrony
-they extended their study to an experiment, primary attachment figures were instructed to ignore babies’ social releasers
-the babies initially showed distress and then some responded by curling and lying motionless
-this showed the significance of infant social behaviour in eliciting the caregiver

20
Q

(Evaluations for monotropy)
Monotropy is socially sensitive

A

Q.Bowlby’s theory is controversial because it has major implications for women. The law of accumulated separation states that having substantial time apart fro a primary attachment figure risks a poor quality attachment that will disadvantage the child in a range of ways later
Burman 1994 places a terrible burden on mothers, setting them up to take the blame

21
Q

(Evaluations for monotropy) Support for IWM

A

Bailey et al 2007: 99 mothers and 1 year olds. Poor attachments of mothers to their parents were more likely to have children classified as poor according to the observations.

22
Q

(Evaluations for montropy) Temperamental hypothesis

A

An infant’s temperament which is a result of their genetic makeup will determine their later social behaviour
Kagan 1982, some babies are more anxious and some are more sociable. These temperaments are innate and not influenced by early experiences.

23
Q

Bowlby’s Maternal Deprivation Theory

A

The emotional and intellectual consequences of separation between a child and his/her mother or mother substitute:

Separation
-Distress when separated for a relatively short period of time from primary caregiver to whom an attachment has been formed

+

Deprivation
-Occurs when a bond that has been formed is broken

=

Bond disruption

24
Q

Effects of Deprivation on Development

A

Intellectual
-Bowlby believed that infants who were deprived of maternal are for too long during the critical period would have delayed intellectual development- abnormally low IQ.

-Goldfarb 1947 found lower IQ in children who remained in institutions as opposed to those who were fostered and those who had a higher standard of emotional care.

Emotional
-Bowlby identified affectionless psychopathy as the inability to experience guilt or strong emotion for others
-This prevents the person developing normal relationships and is associated with criminality
-Lack remorse for their crimes as they cannot appreciate the feelings of the victims

25
Q

(Bowlby 1944 the 44 juvenile thieves) Method

A

Case studies were completed on the backgrounds of 44 adolescents who had been referred to the clinic where Bowlby worked because they had been stealing.

There was a control group of 44 ‘emotionally disturbed’ adolescents who didn’t steal

26
Q

(Bowlby 1944 the 44 juvenile thieves) Results

A

17 of the thieves had experienced frequent separations from their mothers before the age of two, compared with 2 in the control group.

14 of the thieves were diagnosed as ‘affectionless psychopaths’ (they didn’t care about how their actions affected others). 12 of these 14 had experienced separation from their mothers

27
Q

(Bowlby 1944 the 44 juvenile thieves) Conclusion

A

Deprivation of the child from its main carer early in life can have very harmful long-term consequences.

28
Q

(Bowlby 1944 the 44 juvenile thieves) Evaluation

A

Indicates a correlation between deprivation and criminal behaviour, although a causal relationship cannot be established.

There may be other factors such as poverty that caused the behaviour.

Although case studies provide a lot of detailed information, the study relied on retrospective data, which may be unreliable.

The data came before the theory, while the theory is usually made before hand.

29
Q

(Evaluation of Bowlby’s Maternal Deprivation Theory) Evidence may be poor

A

-evidence for the MD theory has come from a number of studies including studies of children orphaned during WW2, those growing ip in poor quality orphanages and the 44 thieves study
-war-orphans were traumatised and often had poor after-care, potentially causing development issues
-children in orphanages were deprived of many aspects of care, not just maternal
-bias, Bowlby conducted his own research

30
Q

(Evaluation of Bowlby’s Maternal Deprivation Theory) Counter-Evidence

A

-Lewis 1954 partially replicated the 44 thieves on a larger scale (500 people)
-a history of early prolonged separation from the mother did not predict criminality or difficulty forming close relationships

31
Q

(Evaluation of Bowlby’s Maternal Deprivation Theory) Critical period is actually more of a sensitive period

A

-Later research has shown that the inevitable damage caused by prolonged separation during Bowlby’s ‘critical period’, is not inevitable
-Some cases of severe deprivation have had good outcomes provided that child has some social interaction and good aftercare

32
Q

(Evaluation of Bowlby’s Maternal Deprivation Theory) Koluchová

A

-Koluchová 1976 reported the case of twin boys from Czechoslovakia who were isolated from the age of 18 months until 7 years
-After they were looked after by two loving adults and appeared to fully recover

33
Q

(Evaluation of Bowlby’s Maternal Deprivation Theory) What did Bowlby mean by Deprivation?

A

-Rutter 1981 claimed that when Bowlby talked of deprivation he was muddling to concepts:
—deprivation is the loss of the primary attachment figure after attachment has developed
—privation is the failure to form any attachment in the first place