Cultural Variations In Attachment Content Flashcards
What is the main study for this topic?
Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988)
What was the procedure of Kroonenberg (1988)?
. 32 studies of attachment where Strange situation had been used were meta-analaysed
. These 32 studies were conducted across 8 countries (15 of them were in USA)
. The 32 studies yielded results for 1990 children
. In the meta-analysis, the results were combined and weighted for sample size
What were the general findings of Kroonenberg (1988)?
. Wide variations in the proportions of attachment types in different studies
. Secure attachment most common across all countries
. Insecure-resistant was the least common attachment type
. Insecure-avoidant attachments observed most commonly in Germany and least commonly in Japan
. Variations between results of studies within the same country were 150% greater than those between countries
What was the aim of the Kroonenberg study?
Investigate whether there were inter-cultural differences (between different countries/cultures) or intra-cultural differences (within same culture) into attachment
What is an individualist culture?
One that emphasises personal independence and achievement at the expensive of group goals
E.g Germany as they value independence, giving way to more insecure avoidant infants
What is a collectivist culture?
One that emphasises family and work goals above individual needs and desires. There is a high degree of interdependence (working together) between people
E.g in Japanese culture where the emphasis is on togetherness. This gives way to insecure resistant infants
What was the range of secure attachment in Kroonenberg study?
Highest: 75% in Britain
Lowest: 50% in China
What was the range of insecure-resistant attachment in Kroonenberg study?
Lowest: 3% in Britain
Highest: 30% in Israel
What was the range of insecure-avoidant attachment in Kroonenberg study?
Highest: Germany
Lowest: Japan
What evidence is there that cultural variation is greater in intracultural difference?
In USA, one study found 46% securely attached compared to another sample as high as 90%, also in the USA
This shows there are intracultural differences as subcultures within a country have different cultural practices that can affect the dominant attachment type
What view does the cultural similarities found in the Kroonenberg study support?
The idea that attachment is an innate and biological process, rather than different child rearing methods used in different countries
What other evidence is there that attachment is culturally similar, not different depending on various child rearing practices?
Tronick et al (1972):
. Studied an African tribe, the Efe, who lived in extended family groups
. The infants were looked after and breastfed by different women but still showed primary attachment towards mother
This supports the idea that attachment is innate and therefore secure attachment is the optimal form of attachment for all humans across all cultures
Which two studies show cultural differences and what does this suggest?
Grossmann and Grossmann (1991)
Takahashi (1990)
These cultural differences are most likely caused by different child rearing practice, which contradicts the idea of innate attachment with the cultural similarities. This shows the inconsistencies of findings on cultural variation as culture is a complex topic.
What were the findings of Grossmann and Grossmann (1991) and why?
. Higher levels of insecure attachment among German infants than other cultures
Due to different child rearing practices: German culture involves keeping some interpersonal distance between parents and children as it is an individualist culture, so infants don’t engage in proximity-seeking behaviours in Strange situation and appear to be insecurely attached
What was the procedure of Takahashi (1990)?
. Used strange situation to study 60 middle-class Japanese infants and their mothers