Cultural Variation in Attachment Flashcards
Culture
norms and values existing within a group of people
Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg procedure
meta-analysis of 32 studies which used SS in 8 different countries –> attachment types between and within countries studied
how many babies were studied in Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg
1990
findings of Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg
difference within culture was 1.5x greater than between cultures
individualistic cultures had similar proportions to Ainsworth –> collectivist had greater insecure attachment
conclusions from Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg
secure attachment is the norm in many cultures, supporting Bowlby’s idea that attachment is innate and secure attachment is the universal norm
research shows cultural practices influence attachment type
cultural variations evaluation
Koreans sample american biased anxiety
Mi Kyoung Ji et al.
Korean study of 87 babies S.S
most of those who were insecure were resistant which is a similar distribution to Japan in og S.S
backs up cultural differences
what did Kagan et al. say about the SS
may measure anxiety rather than attachment and attachment type may be more related to temperament than relationship (shy = resistant, confident = avoidant)