Cultural Evolution: Lectures Flashcards
what anthropological roots are associated with cultural and evolutionary psychology?
cultural psychology is nested within cultural anthropology and cultural evolution is nested within biological anthropoolgy.
biological:
favours quantitative methods, views humans as being a cultural species, argues culture is biological therefore, we should use the terms genetic and cultural (inheritance and transmission)
cultural:
believes in the reciprocity and mutual embeddedness of culture and psyche, the focus within cultural psychology is on the “way of life” (not universals), favours qualitative methods.
single-level vs multi-level theory:
single:
genetics is the only mechanism for evolution (i.e., selfish genes).
Multi-level:
theories of evolution focus on the transmission of inheritable variations in both culture and genes.
(3) caveats in evolutionary psychology?
- naturalistic fallacy
- adaptionism
- just-so stories
what is the naturalistic fallacy?
i.e. caveat
The tendency for people to claim that something is good/acceptable/necessary merely because it is “natural” or evolved.
For example in advertising where potato chips are described as being “natural” to imply that they are better for you and healthier.
what is the adapitonism view?
i.e. caveat
2 ways to search for an adaption
o Is an approach towards evolution that believes that natural selection among individuals within a population is the only important cause of evolution.
o Adaptationists believe that species do not work towards a certain goal but that their adaptions accumulate overtime to produce evolutionary change within a species.
o Therefore, adaptationists only search for adaptions in one of two ways:
In the forward form, the scientist postulates an environmental problem, then searches for the solution to the problem in the organism’s phenotype.
In the backward form, the scientist starts with a known phenotypic solution, then searches for the environmental problem that could have produced it.
- E.g., we know birds have wings so we seek for answers in their environment that could have produced this adaption such as heat regulation. Wings allow for birds to capture and release heat meaning they are able to survive in both hot and cold climates.
- E.g., humans’ babies smile, cry and cling in order to maintain proximity with their caregiver. The evolutionary source of this adaption would be to protect offspring from predators.
(4) Problems with adaptationist approach:
Within a single factor theories description
Problems with description; descriptions made by theorists of evolutionary concepts or relevant behaviours may not exist in the world of organisms. This occurs in one of (4) ways:
• Arbitrary Agglomeration is a problem when you describe a concept as a single unit of analysis but it may be better understood in terms of a process between consistent parts.
• Reification occurs when researchers describe mental constructs as being a part of natural selection when they are not real objects.
• Anthropomorphism when innately human social relationships such as rape are applied onto non-human animals. In doing so, the term loses its inherent cultural meaning. When similar behaviours in humans are found in animals the two terms are often conflated as being the same thing when a relationship is not present.
• Reductionism is the tendency for researchers to simplify complex social organisations or events (i.e., war) is due to individual characteristics that are derived from their individual genetic predisposition for that trait. Single-level belief of transmission of genes cannot account for complex events like social revolutions that occur at too fast of a rate to be due to genetics alone.
what are Just so Theories?
i.e. caveat
o An analogy that reflects just so theories are folk stories within culture that are used to explain why animals that we see today have evolved the way they have.
o E.g., how the camel got his hump.
o Reflects the tendency for researchers to take findings about people’s phenology and derive their own explanations for why that trait was favored by evolution but does not support their claim with valid and reliable data.
o It is important to remember we do not know the histories of the species we see today so claims about their evolution must be backed up by data about the original conditions of which the trait occurred in.
o Remove researcher assumptions and biases and create work grounded in the data.
What is an alternative stance to adaptionism?
Pluralism:
o Because we do not have access to the species history of conditions, we cannot determine why it happened, but we are able to answer how it happened.
o Where researchers studying human evolution seek to find multiple causes and pathways to the evolutionary trait being examined.
o Tends to prefer multi-level theories rather than single level.
o Tends to look at complex interactions between multiple pathways that lead to evolutionary change.
(3) Problems with pluralism?
o There is controversy on “group level selection” and whether or not it is capable of producing evolutionary change (i.e., genetic transmission is poor but sufficient for cultural transmission).
o Lacks Parsimony (i.e., clarity and coherency) having multiple pathways to evolutionary change can lead to issues of epicycles (i.e., not knowing whether the sun goes around the earth or the earth goes around the sun).
o Lacks the rigorous focus in adaptationists on selfish gene-centered transmission.
what is the recipe for evolution (i.e., the three key ingredients).
- Variation within the population (i.e., differences).
- Differences within the population must be inheritable.
- Selection pressure must be present (i.e., pressure for species survival to adapt and favor traits that boost the reproductive success of a species).
* These three components must be present and interact overtime.
what is genetic evolution?
Genetic evolution is the change in allele (i.e., object of interests) frequency within a population (i.e., variation).
For example, chromosomes exist within alleles which make up people’s DNA that can hold variations within a population.
how do we identify “why” variations in alleles occur within a population?
By looking back at the (3) factor recipe for evolutionary change (i.e., variation, inheritance and selection pressures over time).
i.e., what were the selection pressures, how was it inherited, what was its frequency within the population.
what is the key thing to remember when talking about variation?
why?
That evolution happens on populations, not individuals!
Research on the evolution of the human’s species requires us to think at the population level rather than remain individualistic.
Why?
Because humans did not evolve from chimps. Humans and chimps both share a common ancestor through which we independently and accumulate gradually over time.
Can evolution occur without variation?
No.
Inheritance:
a single factor gene perspective states…
This is an example of a single factor theory that believes that genes are the primary and only important mechanism for evolution.
This perspective believes that evolution occurs through the differential survival of competing alleles within a population.
Furthermore, selfish genes (i.e., genes that produce a better outcome for survival at the expense of other gene expressions) are the genes that are most likely to be selected for and transmitted from one generation to the next because they aid reproductive success.
Helps us understand phenomena like altruism, cooperation and intragenomic conflict that we cannot understand with an organic perspective.