Critical Numbers Flashcards

1
Q

Sampling

A

We take a representative sample from the population of interst

We describe our sample using descriptive statistics

We make inference about our population using inferential statistics

Samples may be randomly or non-randomly selected

There are different methods of random and non-random sampling

Important thing is sample must represent population of interest
This helps make our results generalisable

When certain subgroups from the target population are over/under-represented the sample may be biased
e.g. GP survey which excludes centres in lower socioeconomic status areas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Bias

A

Bias’ arises when imperfections in the research process cause our findings to deviate from the truth

Bias can occur in all studies

It can occur intentionally or unintentionally

It impacts upon the validity and reliability of study findings
Put simply, it can distort results

It is our responsibility to minimise bias in our research
and consider it when critically evaluating the research of others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Types of bias

A

Sampling bias

Recall bias

Information bias

The ‘Hawthorne’ effect

Attrition bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Sampling bias

A

sample does not represent population of interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Recall bias

A

inaccurate recall of past events/exposures/behaviours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Information bias

A

incorrect measurement e.g. miscalibrated machine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

The ‘Hawthorne’ effect

A

participants change their behaviour when they know they are being observed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Attrition bias

A

differential dropout from studies e.g. sicker participants drop out so our outcome is only measured on healthier participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Cofounding

A

Confounding, if unaccounted for, is a form of bias

Confounding variables obscure the real effect of an exposure on an outcome

They may suggest that there is a relationship between two factors when there isn’t actually, or vice versa

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is a cofounder?

A

A cofounder is related to both exposure and outcome

But is not on the casual pathway

E.g a high salt diet can cause high blood pressure which can lead to stroke. So blood pressure is NOT a cofounding factor in the relationship between deit and stroke, rather than a mechanism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Correlation does not imply causation

A

Potential cofounders must be considered in the design, analysis and interpretation of studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Studies can be classified according to whether they are:

A

Experimental – the researchers have intervened in some way

Observational – the researchers have not intervened, merely observed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Observational studies can be:

A

Retrospective – looking back into the past

Cross-sectional – a single snapshot in time

Prospective – following up over time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Randomised controlled trials

A

Randomly allocate participants to different interventions and follow up

Experimental

Prospective

Slide 23

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

There are variations on the standard RCT design

A

Cluster randomised trails

Crossover trials

Multi-arm and factorial trials

Adaptive design trials

Regardless of design, all clinical trials are monitored throughout to ensure participant safety and integrity of results.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Cluster randomised trials

A

participants randomised in groups (e.g. by GP centre or therapist) rather than at the individual level

17
Q

Crossover trails

A

participants receive both interventions in a randomised order

Putting people on drug A and swithcing them onto drug B half way through but if drug A has already cured means trial can not continue so we use this on people with chronic illnesses

18
Q

Multi arm and factorial trials

A

accruing information is used to inform planned design adaptations

19
Q

Pros of RCT

A

Gold standard’

Randomisation reduces potential for confounding

Can reduce bias via control and blinding

Can determine causal effects

20
Q

Cons of RCT

A

Randomisation can be unfeasible or unethical (can you think of any examples?)

Require expert management and oversight, particularly for ‘high risk’ interventions

Expensive

21
Q

Co-hort studies

A

Non-randomised

Observational

Typically prospective

22
Q

Pros of cohort studies

A

Useful when random allocation not possible

Can work for rare exposures – select participants on the basis of exposure

Can examine multiple outcomes

23
Q

Cons of cohort studies

A

May require long follow-up

Can be expensive

Not ideal for rare outcomes

24
Q

Case- control studies

A

Non-randomised

Observational

Retrospective

25
Q

Pros of case

A

Faster - use past data so do not require long follow-up

Useful for rare outcomes – select participants on the basis of outcome

Cheaper

26
Q

Cons of case-control studies

A

More prone to bias or poor quality data

Harder to show causal relationship

Not ideal for rare exposures

27
Q

Cross sectional studies

A

Non-randomised

Observational

Single time point

28
Q

Pros of cross-secctional studies

A

Relatively quick

Cheap

Can assess multiple exposures/outcomes

29
Q

Cons of cross sectional studies

A

Susceptible to bias

Cannot prove causality

Not ideal for rare exposures/outcomes

30
Q

Ecological studies

A

The unit of observation is group (aggregate) rather than individual
e.g. Electoral ward, country

E.g. Higher intake of fatty foods and higher rates on breast cancer in one country relative to another. This does not mean that those poeple who eat more fatty foods are the ones with cancer

31
Q

Pros of ecological studies

A

Large-scale comparisons

Can quantify geographical or temporal trends

32
Q

Cons of ecological studies

A

Ecological fallacy

Cannot make inference at the individual level

33
Q

The heirachy of evidence

A

Slide 34

34
Q

PICO

A

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

used to formulate a research question