Criminal Procedure Flashcards
What are the four steps for search and seizure analysis?
1) Is the search and seizure governed by 4th Am? 2) Is search or seizure conducted w/ a warrant that satisfies 4th Am? 3) Is search or seizure conducted w/o warrant satisfying 4th Am requirements? 4) Is evidence obtained through a search and seizure that violates 4th Am nonetheless admissible in court?
What is the analysis for whether the search or seizure is governed by the 4th Am?
First, was the search or seizure executed by a government agent? Second, was there a reasonable expectation of privacy in the area searched or items seized?
What are the two important categories of government agents for bar purposes?
Publicly paid police, on or off duty, AND private citizens if and only if they are acting at the direction of the police. (Private security is not govt agent unless deputized.)
What are the protected areas in which people have reasonable expectations of privacy?
4th Am protects unreasonable searches and seizures of their 1) persons, 2) houses (incl. hotel rooms), 3) papers (personal correspondence), and 4) effects (purses, backpacks). Home based privacy includes the “area of domestic use” immediately surrounding the house called the curtilage.
What is important about SCOTUS’s GPS case?
US v. Jones: case governed by trespass because tracker attached to a vehicle. This is a CL understanding of 4th Am. Trespass = search.
What are the certain categories of items that are sufficiently public in nature that they carry no reasonable expectation of privacy even if they are searched or seized?
Patty Achieved A Glorious Victory Over Her Opponents. Paint scrapings on outside of your car; Account records held by a bank; Airspace; Garbage left at curb for collection; Voice exemplars; Odor (even those emanating from car or luggage); Hand writing; Open fields and what you can see across it.
What do all of the unprotected items have in common?
Knowing exposure to 3d parties.
Who has standing to challenge the search or seizure?
An individual whose personal privacy rights have been invaded.
Does V have standing if she owns the premises searched?
Yes. Always.
Does V who does not own the premises searched but who resides there have standing?
Always.
If V neither owns nor resides in the premises searched but is an overnight guest there, does V have standing?
V always has standing as to areas overnight guests can be expected to have access to.
If V neither owns, nor resides, nor are staying overnight but are merely using someone else’s home solely for business purposes, does she have standing?
No. Never.
If V owns the property seized in the search, does she have standing?
Only if reasonable expectation of privacy in the area from which property is seized.
Do passengers in cars have standing to sue?
Only if they have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the item or area searched or seized. Passenger can always challenge the stop.
What is never sufficient to provide the authority to challenge the search and seizure in court?
The fact that incriminating evidence may be introduced against an individual in court.
What is the three part test for whether the search warrant under which criminal evidence was gathered satisfies 4th Am requirements?
Ask: 1) is the warrant supported by probable cause and particularity (and issued by a neutral magistrate)? 2) If not, did police officers rely on a defective warrant in good faith? 3) Was the warrant properly executed by the police?
What is probable cause?
Requires proof of a fair probability that contraband or evidence of crime will be found in the area searched.
What is admissible in making the probable cause determination?
Hearsay and info obtained thru informant’s tips, even if info is anonymous. Sufficiency of the tip rests on corroboration by the police of enough of the tipster’s info to allow the magistrate to make a “common sense practical determination” that PC exists based on the totality of the circumstances.
What if you get a PC question on the VA essay exam?
Follow SCOTUS 4th Am law. Case-by-case facto oriented analysis determined from perspective of a reasonable law enforcement officer (obj. standard). Note PC may be established as to one person or one place but not as to another. No PC if see hand rolled cigs; Yes PC if dog sniff alerts.
What is particularity?
Search warrant must specify the place to be searched and the item to be seized. Cannot have a general warrant that authorizes a fishing expedition.
What is the magistrate requirement for the search warrant?
Warrant must be issued by a neutral and detached magistrate.
When does an officer’s good faith fail to save a defective search warrant?
Four categorical exceptions: (1) Affidavit supporting the warrant application is so egregiously lacking in PC no reasonable officer would have relied; (2) So facially deficient in particularity that officers couldn’t reasonably presume it to be valid; (3) Affidavit contains knowing or reckless falsehoods that are necessary to PC finding; (4) Magistrate who issued the warrant is biased in favor of prosecution.
If warrant was valid or relied on in GF, how do you know if warrant was properly executed by the police?
(1) Did officers executing the warrant stay w/in terms and limits (i.e. stay w/in scope)? (2) Did officers executing the warrant comply with “knock and announce”?
What does it mean to comply with the warrant’s terms and limitations?
In executing the warrant, officers are allowed to search only those areas and items authorized by the language of the warrant.